NP Rank:
Green Machine: Why cities need parks to be liveable
It's not easy being green, especially if you're an urban monstrosity in the 21st century. But new studies are showing that urban planning movements from 150 years ago may have possessed more foresight than originally thought. Think about it: as city dwellers we long for a little patch of green to make our own (even temporarily) that will allow us to move through miles upon miles of concrete without losing our collective minds. Hence the park movement of the 1800s, a notion that still proves valuable today.
One of the ideas associated with the parks movement is still visible in cities such as New York, Toronto and Chicago: Build one large park, plus lots of smaller, connecting spaces throughout the city.Urban activist Jane Jacobs lobbied for such planning. She thought urban life would be improved if cities had large parks accessible by transit and smaller ones in neighbourhoods that were open gathering places, rather than fenced-in areas with monuments.
Vancouver does pretty well, too, according to this recent study:
In Canada, Vancouver has a high percentage of parks compared to other urban centres. The city's 200 green spaces cover a total of 1,300 hectares — 11 per cent of the total land mass. Stanley Park alone covers about 400 hectares, including hiking trails, beaches and an 8.8 km seawall.
Crowd Power
-
mtippett
Vancouver, Canada -
LarimdaME
Brooklyn, New York, United States -
Eric Flexyourhead
Vancouver (NE Downtown / Harbour Centre / Gastown / Yaletown), British Columbia, Canada -
infomatique
Dublin, Ireland -
CHARLES BRAY
Toronto, Ontario, Canada -
nsaldivar
Pasadena, Texas, United States -
pjmorgan
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States -
TripleA
Toronto, Canada -
ash2276
Canada












Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (10)
at 12:17 on July 10th, 2007
Yes, Green space in cities make them more livable. The wonderful thing about Chicago is that it is peppered with dozens of parks with green space, from the very large parks such as Humboldt, Jackson, Douglas, and Garfield to smaller parks such Welles, Mather,or Portage, just to name a few. And I haven't even talked about the Green Space (24 miles of public park land!) along the Chicago Lakefront, "forever open, clear, and free." Having the parks throughout the city means that green space does not belong to one ethnic group or social class; everyone has access to the "lungs of the city." Many of these parks also boast architectural gems. Having green space througout the city of Chicago makes the city "greener" in another sense; you don't have to drive for miles to get to green space. Many of these spaces are walkable or accessible by public transit.
http://www.chicagoparkdistrict.com/
at 13:59 on July 10th, 2007
Thanks for commenting, Pam!
You're right too, about the class/ethnic side of park planning. That was a function of the original park plan for cities in the 1800s--to create a space that was open for all, regardless of class or ethnicity. I love that, unlike many things, that original plan has not been corrupted.
The only other place I can think of where that is still true is libraries--and I'm a huge fan of libraries as well. :)
at 18:49 on July 10th, 2007
Funny you should mention that about libraries, since that is also a goal of the Chicago Public Library, to have a public library in as many communities as possible. 75 plus branches in the city of Chicago. Spent the last 10 years working for CPL...
at 12:35 on July 10th, 2007
Hi Kaitlin,
I live in Dublin and we are fortunate to have a large selection of
really good parks including Phoenix Park which measures 712 hectares
(1752 acres), with a walled circumference of 16 km that contains large
areas of grassland and tree-lined avenues. The park is home to a herd
of wild Fallow deer. I really do like these parks and have thousands of
photographs but there is always the fear that some of the lesser parks may be sold for development.
Good stuff.
at 23:46 on July 10th, 2007
Kaitlin, I like this story. It's good stuff.
See also my report:
http://www.nowpublic.com/cutting_back_topiary_heaton_park_manchester
at 06:53 on July 11th, 2007
I think that access to green space is a necessity when living in a city like Toronto. Like any urban centre that experiences extreme seasonal shifts in temperature, Toronto literally comes alive in the spring and summer and the green spaces become filled with people trying to get in touch with nature and escape the city around them.
The great thing about a space like High Park is that it's size allows you to completely escape any indication that there is a sprawling city wrapped around you. Its a real shame that there isn't an easier way to get into the green space on the Toronto Islands; the largest amount of grass and trees downtown. Reclaiming space and turning it green is the new challenge for our generation, as many areas of the city decay and stand derelict.
A great example of this movement is the West Toronto Railpath , which not only proposes to reclaim unused land as green space, but also helps solve the growing traffic problem in the downtown core by creating a "linear park and a sustainable transportation corridor". As a resident of one of the neighborhoods that the proposed path would cut through, and an avid bike commuter, I can't tell you how great this would be for me, our community and the city in general. Lets hope other's agree and figure it out.
at 07:15 on July 11th, 2007
Thanks, TripleA, for posting this comment...escape is a key factor here, I think.
at 07:17 on July 11th, 2007
Parks, libraries, public buildings for art and performance are all essential components of vibrant urban environments. Without all of these, a city is destined to be little more than a business district to which suburban residents commute to and from work. They also present funding challenges for city government. Therefore, with respect to parks, not all parks are created equal. While it may be true that parks are present for all residents - despite economic advantage and/or ethnicity - not all of these parks are welcome spaces for the residents. In poorer areas, parks are neglegted and in disrepair; often they are a place where illicit goods are bought and sold (i.e. drugs, guns, etc.) In short, when considering the park systems in urban environments, it is not enough to consider the gems, one must also consider the wasted opportunities. Urban residents need to get involved with the city park district, and make sure that all the parks are maintained and accessible for all.
at 01:03 on July 15th, 2007
I live in Edinburgh which is lucky to have both public and private gardens throughout the city centre, including the Princes Street Gardens which commercially would be worth millions, but would detract from the exceptional beauty of the city if ever developed.
at 17:08 on July 21st, 2007
I don't know how long I'd survive in Chicago without all its parks. My dorm at the University of Chicago was right on the Midway Plaissance, a one block wide, ten blocks long strip of park connecting two of the largest parks in the city, Washington and Jackson. Then, as Pam M. mentioned above, there are the lakefront green spaces with bike trails and incredible views of the city skyline. I can hardly think of a day when I didn't go for a walk with friends or alone, bike, picnic, take photos, or any combination of those. I think the parks are Chicago's most valuable possessions, after all, the city's motto is Urbs in Horto, "City in a Garden."
Thanks for the story, Kaitlin!
-Ellis