18-Year Old Nadia Kajouji's Suicide COULD Have Been Prevented

by Michelle Says So | April 29, 2008 at 10:39 am
1446 views | 17 Recommendations | 4 comments

Photos

18-Year Old Nadia Kajouji's Suicide COULD Have Been Prevented

18-Year Old Nadia Kajouji's Suicide COULD Have Been Prevented

see larger image

uploaded by Michelle Says So


Since I am American, I do not know the health privacy laws of Canada. However, I do know that once a person turns 18, there is no legal obligation for a doctor to reveal or release one's medical records, or even to inform parents or family that their patient has a serious health problem and needs support and additional treatment. Yet, according to Canadian law, and Ann Cavoukian, Ontario's privacy commissioner, a University CAN disclose health information to parents. 

BUT WHAT WAS DONE? NOTHING...

Here's an example: The Virginia Tech massacre. Seung-Hui Cho, who killed 32 people, not including himself, and who seriously injured dozens of others was clinically depressed and was seeking treatment; yet due to the HIPAA laws in the United States ("Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act"), no one was informed of his condition.

Look how that ended up. Thirty-three dead and an entire university and community in shambles. What could have been prevented? Why did no one speak out? Even an insurance company has the rights to one's medical records!

These laws are to protect that person's privacy, but there has to be a line drawn in this case and exceptions must be made. These conditions are a matter of life and death. It's not as if Nadia was getting an abortion, or in a drug rehabilitation program, where that is kept strictly confidential. But in cases like this, when one is threatening or thinking of suicide, someone must be held accountable for keeping silent.

In my opinion, the University and the lack of their actions are responsible for the death of Nadia. If her doctor would have come out and told her parents that she needed more psychiatric care than what she was receiving, she might still be here. If the University took a moment out of their "busy schedule" to talk to Nadia's family, she might still be here.

This specific Canadian law was put in place to protect people. Not to hide and end up with the grizzly consequence of one's death, or the death of many.

It's time that our society (not just Canada, but the U.S., and the international population as a whole) wakes up, re-evaluates our understanding and education regarding mental health and address it instead of ignoring it by sweeping it under the rug, like so many did in the 1950's-1960's.  This disease takes the lives of 1,000,000 worldwide per year.

I feel angry and empathize with Nadia's family. Something should have been done. Sometimes one has to "screw the rules". Sometimes rules are meant to be broken. In this situation, it should have been broken...out of the conscience of her doctors or therapists.

She was in dire need of help, but did not receive adequate treatment. For crying out loud, she was corresponding over the internet with a perfect stranger for help! What does that say? How does that reflect our attitudes and priorities? It only shows ignorance, a continuing stigma, and the fact that society, the law, physicians, and health insurance companies DO NOT CARE about those afflicted with depression or other mental illnesses.

If you are reading this and have or are currently suffering from depression or any other mental illness such as bipolar disorder, I'm sure you've heard this many times: "Snap out of it!" "Pull yourself up with your boot straps and get on!" "Go exercise!" The list goes on and on.

I am angry with the "system" and the "powers that be". It's disgusting and against all decent human rights. When people need help in situations such as this, hiding or ignoring the problem will only make situations worse and more people will die as a result. 

(my opinion provided by Michelle Says So)

 

ACTUAL STORY

The parents of a university student found dead last week after missing could legally have been informed by the university that their daughter was being treated for depression, says Ann Cavoukian, Ontario's privacy commissioner.

Carleton University officials said privacy laws did not allow them to disclose that information to her family, but that isn't true, Cavoukian told CBC News.

"That is fiction," she said. "I'm so upset about this that I've just written a letter to the presidents of the universities and colleges in Ontario advising them of the fact sheet that we issued in 2005 advising them of my repeated attempts to set the record straight."

She said it's not easy for a university to decide to disclose such information to a parent, but the law does allow you to do it.

recommend Add a comment
moonwolf
moonwolf
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 11:45 on April 29th, 2008

Michelle Says So, I like this story.

urbano411
urbano411
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 14:48 on April 29th, 2008

Michelle Says So, I like this story. It's good stuff. Too often we protect things in a way that cause us to lose the very things we most want to protect. Thanks for your insight Michelle.

0
jayr_patron

very well said!

jayr_patron
jayr_patron
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 19:59 on April 29th, 2008

Michelle Says So, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from