Fertility treatments linked to certain birth defects

by reno_fog | November 19, 2008 at 05:55 am
128 views | 25 Recommendations | 6 comments

Photos

IVF Photograph

IVF Photograph

see larger image

uploaded by LotusFlower

Many babies are created in this way.  As the number goes up, birth defects will increase... More caution must be employed to prevent this from happening.

ATLANTA, Georgia (CNN) -- A new study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has found that infants born as a result of assisted reproductive technology, or ART -- such as in vitro fertilization and the use of donor eggs -- are two to four times more likely to be born with certain types of birth defects than infants conceived naturally. But, the study's lead author says, the overall risk is still relatively low.

With any pregnancy, there is a 3 percent risk of having a baby with a birth defect.

"The most important findings were that for infants conceived using ART, we see an increased risk for certain birth defects," said Jennita Reefhuis, Ph.D., an epidemiologist at the CDC's National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities. She says that children conceived using ART were found to have twice the risk of septal heart defects (a "hole" in the heart), more than twice the risk of cleft lip with or without cleft palate, and four times the risk of two gastrointestinal defects.

The study findings pertain only to single births; the researchers did not find a link between ART and birth defects among multiple births. ART increases the chances of having a multiple birth, and infants born as part of a multiple birth are more likely to have birth defects regardless of the method of conception.

"It is important for parents to realize that the individual risk for these birth defects remain low," Reefhuis said. "It sounds like a lot to say 'a two- to fourfold increased risk,' but you have to keep in mind that the starting risk for these individual defects is actually pretty low."


Elizabeth Ginsburg, M.D., president of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies and the medical director of in vitro fertilization at Brigham and Women's hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, says the study adds to a growing body of evidence. Ginsburg is not connected to the CDC study.

"I think the take-home message is that if you have infertility and you are going to get help to try to conceive, there is some evidence that you might be at increased risk of having a baby with problems," Ginsburg said.


ART, which has been used in the United States since 1981, is defined as any procedure that involves surgically removing eggs from a woman's ovaries, combining them with sperm in the laboratory, and returning them to the woman's body or donating them to another woman. It does not include intrauterine -- or artificial -- insemination or egg-stimulating drugs such as Clomid.

It is estimated that more than 1 percent of babies born in the United States are conceived using ART, and that number has been steadily rising, with the rate doubling between 1996 and 2004. In 2005, 134,000 ART procedures were performed, resulting in approximately 52,000 births. Almost 12 percent of women ages 15 to 44 report having used some kind of infertility treatment, according to a 2002 national survey.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Paschen

That could lush a lot of panic and more.

0
Amy Judd

I am glad to see the risk is still low - many people are turning to this method to help them conceive.

0
Barbara McPherson

I'm surprised that 12% of women needed to use ART to get pregnant.  ART must be a huge industry.

0
reno_fog

It is here in Reno, Nevada

0
Minh N. Ho, M.D.

"In the US, 1 in every 950 babies is born with a cleft lip with or without cleft palate. The study showed that using ART doubled this risk to around 1 in every 425."

As a Fertility Specialist, I always keep patients informed about the facts. Patients should weigh between the risks and the benefits before decide to proceed with any procedure.

However, read between the lines. Statistic data tend to fool the audience by using multiple or percentage.

Take example of the statement above, from the original report,  in raw data, how many more baby (ies) has birth defect in a population of 1000 as compared to the control?

Studies also showed that, some of these birth defects probably has something to do with the original causes of infertility ( age, familial trait etc..)
Minh N. Ho, MD
Board Certified in REI

http://www.ivfdoc.com

XPert Fertility Care of California


0
reno_fog

Thanks for the comment

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Rhonda J Mangus
First Flagged at 6:04 AM, Nov 19, 2008 by Rhonda J Mangus
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Health

Recommendations (25)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from