Four out of five sunscreen brands don't live up to their promises

by rpshen | July 1, 2008 at 08:42 am
2317 views | 14 Recommendations | 4 comments

Photos

Household Objects w/ LightScoop

Household Objects w/ LightScoop

see larger image

uploaded by cstein96

Videos

SunSure® Technology___a Breakthrough in Suncare!

see larger video

sourced by rpshen

SunSure® Technology___a Breakthrough in Suncare!
As summer heats up, we're all busy slathering on our sunscreen before heading out to the beach. But did you know that 4 out of 5 consumer brands of sunscreen don't live up to their claims? In fact, leading brands such as Coppertone, Neutrogena and Banana Boat, are among the worst at protecting our skin from the sun.

The Environmental Working Group, a Washington-based nonprofit, has released an investigation of nearly 1,000 brand-name sunscreens that says four out of five don't adequately protect consumers and may contain harmful chemicals.

The group says some of the products of the nation's leading brands -- including Coppertone, Neutrogena and Banana Boat -- are the poorest performers.

Both Coppertone and Neutrogena defend the rigorous testing done for their products while Banana Boat refuses to comment on the issue.

Coppertone was named by the Environmental Working Group as having 41 products that failed to meet the group's criteria for issues ranging from failing to protect adequately to containing potentially harmful ingredients to making unsubstantiated claims. But in a statement to CNN, the company says it "rigorously tests all its products in the lab and in the real world," to ensure they're safe and effective.

Neutrogena says its sunscreen products have been "embraced by dermatologists and consumers for their efficacy," and says its new Helioplex technology provides broad-spectrum UV defense against sun damage.

Now that we've tossed our beloved bottle of (insert your favorite sunscreen brand here) in the trash can, what exactly should we be looking for in our next purchase? According to EWG, it's not just our trusted SPF. In fact, our national brands, high in SPF, are quite good at protecting us from sunburns and UVB rays, but they fail to protect us from UVA rays, which tan the skin. Since FDA currently does not have any regulations on UVA protection, top brands can simply dismiss them.

The science of sunscreens is simple: Active ingredients are compounds that absorb, reflect or block ultraviolet light. Sunscreens are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration not as cosmetics, but over-the-counter drugs. Sunscreens are rated based on their SPF, or "Sun Protection Factor." The higher the SPF, the better the protection against sunburn.

The Environmental Working Group says the SPF rating on a sun product is only part of what consumers need to know, and one of the biggest problems with sunscreens is that they don't fully protect against sunlight.

"A good, effective sunscreen must prevent against a broad spectrum of rays," says Sonya Lunder, a senior researcher at the Environmental Working Group.

Sunlight is composed of two types of ultraviolet light -- UVB rays, which cause sunburns, and UVA rays, which tan. While both may increase the risk of skin cancer, sun damage and wrinkles, the FDA doesn't require sunscreens to protect against both, just UVB.

The FDA acknowledges new rules mandating UVA testing and labeling requirements are being evaluated, but the Environmental Working Group wants tougher standards now.

"The fact most sunscreens still don't don't offer UVA protection and the fact the FDA has been working for years to finalize its rules is really what provoked us to look at this issue," Lunder says.

Does that mean that we can't go out and enjoy the sun until the new regulations have been set up? Of course not. EWG recommends sunscreens that provide a physical barrier.

If you are sensitive to sunscreen, never go without. Instead, try sunscreens that provide a physical barrier, such as zinc oxide or titanium dioxide. New micronizing technology makes both appear more transparent on the skin, so you don't have to look like a lifeguard with a white nose.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
michelle.sundvick

Note to sun worshippers:  pay attention to the expiry dates on the bottles for they are not just a money-making scheme; the ingredients actually stop working and you will burn in weird patterns... sadly I know from experience.

jayp
jayp
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 11:47 on July 1st, 2008

rpshen, I like this story. It's good stuff. The Environmental Working Group  (http://www.ewg.org/)  is worth looking at for info about other cosmetics, toothpastes, etc that we also use with total confidence in their manufacturers.

Yuliya Talmazan
Yuliya Talmazan
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 12:40 on July 1st, 2008

rpshen, I like this story. It's good stuff. Another reminder that the reassurances of brand names might be deceptive. 

SOLARLIFE
SOLARLIFE
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 14:59 on July 1st, 2008

rpshen, I like this story. UVA UVB protection, saw a new version in France of suncream only SPF indicator, but no UVA/UVB protection, seems to be the worst reaction to tests.  UV levels between 8 and 10, now also 11 no sun cream protects, only solution get of the beach at 10:30 don't return before 4 pm. Especially people in the north of france get melanoms. Why ? It's cloudy not many using sun cream, but UV rays go through clouds burning the skin. Thanks for your good researched important news. You should write about sunglasses, same confusing thing, written 100% UV protection class2, for example means you get blind.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

jayp
First Flagged at 11:47 AM, Jul 1, 2008 by jayp
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Health

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from