The Great American Autism Debate

by Emilio Lizardo | September 4, 2008 at 10:36 am
420 views | 29 Recommendations | 13 comments

Photos

The Great American Autism Debate

The Great American Autism Debate

see larger image

uploaded by Emilio Lizardo

Now Public Contributor E. Lizardo
September 4, 2008 2:25 PM EDT

OPINION:

Good news and bad news about world's autism epidemic.

First the good news.

Study: No link between measles vaccine and autism
updated 11:32 p.m. EDT, Wed September 3, 2008

(CNN) -- The Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine causes neither autism nor gastrointestinal disorders, a study reported Wednesday, disputing a theory that has persisted for a decade.

The theory was created in 1998, when British researcher Andrew Wakefield published studies that suggested the measles vaccine caused gastrointestinal problems and that those GI problems led to autism.W. Ian Lipkin of Columbia University in New York, who co-authored the most recent study, said Wakefield theorized that the virus used in the vaccine grew in the intestinal tract, leading to inflammation that made the bowel porous. That allowed material to seep from the bowel into the blood, Wakefield's theory surmised, affecting the nervous system and causing autism.

Some background on the Wakefield Autism Study

GMC Challenged On MMR Inquiry Chief's Vaccine Firm Links
London, England & Scotland/29 May 2007/JWock/   The Chairman of the General Medical Council's inquiry into MMR vaccine doctor Andrew Wakefield, Professor Dennis McDevitt, is being challenged over undisclosed personal interests.  On 11th July this year an unprecedented 14 week GMC hearing chaired by Professor McDevitt was due to commence into charges against Dr Andrew Wakefield of the Royal Free Hospital relating to the controversial vaccine.  However, previously secret government minutes reveal Professor McDevitt was himself a member of a 1988 government safety panel  which approved Pluserix MMR as safe for vaccine manufacturer Smith Kline & French Laboratories (see first .pdf attached).  Pluserix MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine was introduced in 1988 but the Government was forced to withdraw it in November 1992 after large numbers children suffered suspected adverse vaccine reactions.

This development follows the recent discovery that High Court Judge Sir Nigel Davis, who in a secret hearing rejected the MMR childrens' appeals against withdrawal of legal (see second .pdf attached), failed to disclose his brother was main board director of the MMR vaccine manufacturer's parent company GlaxoSmithKline (more below).

The GMC hearing against Dr Wakefield relates to events in 1998, seven years after legal investigations into the MMR childrens' ailments first started.  Dr Wakefield angered MMR vaccination proponents and created a furore in 1998, when he suggested offering single vaccines alongside MMR - albeit that is current official Conservative party policy.

Nearly 2000 children alleged to be suffering from autism, deafness, bowel disorders and other serious injuries caused by the vaccine filed legal claims against manufacturer Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltd.  Investigations into the claims started in 1991 when applications for legal aid were first being filed.  The vaccine was given to 85% of MMR vaccinated children between 1988 and 1992.  Labour MP Jack Ashley said at the time of the 1992 withdrawal that correspondence with Minister Virginia Bottomley MP confirmed government knew of the problems in March 1991, some 18 months earlier.

And Now the Bad News
I have been following the autism story for some time now, since autism became an issue in the life of an acquaintance. What I learned about the autism epidemic was very suprising.

And, as background to the current news article cited above, I provide the following citation from an article which ran a few years ago in the Rolling Stone® Magazine.

Deadly Immunity
Jun 20, 2005 12:00 AM

In June 2000, a group of top government scientists and health officials gathered for a meeting at the isolated Simpsonwood conference center in Norcross, Georgia. Convened by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the meeting was held at this Methodist retreat center, nestled in wooded farmland next to the Chattahoochee River, to ensure complete secrecy. The agency had issued no public announcement of the session -- only private invitations to fifty-two attendees. There were high-level officials from the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration, the top vaccine specialist from the World Health Organization in Geneva and representatives of every major vaccine manufacturer, including GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Wyeth and Aventis Pasteur. All of the scientific data under discussion, CDC officials repeatedly reminded the participants, was strictly "embargoed."

There would be no making photocopies of documents, no taking papers with them when they left.

According to transcripts obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, many at the meeting were concerned about how the damaging revelations about thimerosal would affect the vaccine industry's bottom line. "We are in a bad position from the standpoint of defending any lawsuits," said Dr. Robert Brent, a pediatrician at the Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children in Delaware. "This will be a resource to our very busy plaintiff attorneys in this country." Dr. Bob Chen, head of vaccine safety for the CDC, expressed relief that "given the sensitivity of the information, we have been able to keep it out of the hands of, let's say, less responsible hands." Dr. John Clements, vaccines advisor at the World Health Organization, declared that "perhaps this study should not have been done at all." He added that "the research results have to be handled," warning that the study "will be taken by others and will be used in other ways beyond the control of this group."

[T]he government has proved to be far more adept at handling the damage than at protecting children's health. The CDC paid the Institute of Medicine to conduct a new study to whitewash the risks of thimerosal, ordering researchers to "rule out" the chemical's link to autism. It withheld Verstraeten's findings, even though they had been slated for immediate publication, and told other scientists that his original data had been "lost" and could not be replicated. And to thwart the Freedom of Information Act, it handed its giant database of vaccine records over to a private company, declaring it off-limits to researchers.

The drug companies are also getting help from powerful lawmakers in Washington. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, who has received $873,000 in contributions from the pharmaceutical industry, has been working to immunize vaccine makers from liability in 4,200 lawsuits that have been filed by the parents of injured children. On five separate occasions, Frist has tried to seal all of the government's vaccine-related documents -- including the Simpsonwood transcripts -- and shield Eli Lilly, the developer of thimerosal, from subpoenas. In 2002, the day after Frist quietly slipped a rider known as the "Eli Lilly Protection Act" into a homeland security bill, the company contributed $10,000 to his campaign and bought 5,000 copies of his book on bioterrorism. The measure was repealed by Congress in 2003 -- but earlier this year, Frist slipped another provision into an anti-terrorism bill that would deny compensation to children suffering from vaccine-related brain disorders.In May of last year, the Institute of Medicine issued its final report. Its conclusion:

There is no proven link between autism and thimerosal in vaccines. Rather than reviewing the large body of literature describing the toxicity of thimerosal, the report relied on four disastrously flawed epidemiological studies examining European countries, where children received much smaller doses of thimerosal than American kids. It also cited a new version of the Verstraeten study, published in the journal Pediatrics, that had been reworked to reduce the link between thimerosal and autism. The new study included children too young to have been diagnosed with autism and overlooked others who showed signs of the disease. The IOM declared the case closed and -- in a startling position for a scientific body -- recommended that no further research be conducted.

Of course one sees here the same old story of corporate disregard of people in their blind pursuit of profits. A tired old story if ever there was one, certainly.

America Exports the Autism Epidemic ?
And from the website of Josef Hasslberger, an independent health issues researcher, we have some indications of the link between Chinese autism and American vaccines.

Deadly Immunity: Exporting The Autism Epidemic
June 19, 2005

When it comes to thimerosal science is now totally against the medical elite and the pharmaceutical companies as well as your local friendly doctor.  But with their money and power the pharmaceutical companies have maintained a long list of medical officials who sustain a medical horror that has neurologically damaged millions of children. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., speaking on national radio this week on the Imus show,[i] expressed this graphically, indicating those medical officials, when they speak about thimerosal in vaccines, use “high sounding language, but under questioning they fall apart because the science is so clear that thimerosal is deadly. The scientific evidence is now so overwhelming (that thimerosal is toxic) that it’s almost bizarre the way medical officials defend its safety. They have no defense and they know it. It’s an institutional bureaucratic cover-up.” On the  Scarborough Country show Kennedy went on to say, "One in every 166 children has autism. Plus one in six have other kinds of learning disorders, other kinds of neurological disorders, speech delay, language disorders, ADD, hyperactivity, that all seem to be connected to autism -- to Thimerosal.  There are literally hundreds and hundreds of studies that connect Thimerosal to these disastrous neurological disorders."

And more here, from further down the same page.

“The worst thing is we are now shipping it abroad. They are giving this to kids all over the third world. In China autism was unknown five years ago. In 1999 they started giving them American vaccines containing thimerosal. Our companies are over there administering these to the Chinese children there and now there are 1.8 million cases of autism. Autism is exploding; we are exporting this stuff all over the third world. Autism is exploding in Argentina, Nigeria, in India.”

“What is going to happen when our enemies around the world, America’s enemies, realize that the United States most heralded foreign policy, which is to vaccinate the children of the world, one of the best things we do, that we are actually using that policy to poison the brains of developing world children. This is a disaster.”

Imus, who interviewed Kennedy said, “I have had the most powerful people in the media tell me that its hopeless to go up against the pharmaceutical lobby.” The major news networks are in bed with pharmaceutical money abandoning their major responsibilities to inform and protect the public. The handwriting is on the wall for doctors and government officials around the world, who continue on with what can only be described as a brutal ignorance about the thimerosal issue. Meanwhile the mainstream press, for fear of losing advertising money, would see a generation poisoned rather than do their jobs.  

Conclusion
What began with a hopeful announcement that we have nothing to fear from measles vaccines perforating the bowels of young children and thereby causing autism has ended up as yet another indictment of corporate manhandling of its customers.

Of course, anyone familiar with my stance on the 'heartless corporate machine,' which, in my view is driven not by any regard whatever for bringing beneifit to anything but its own bottom line, it will come as no suprise to hear my opinion that news releases such as the the one today from CNN® cited above, serve only to muddy the waters by confusing the issue, adding only more and more smoke and mirrors to the already deeply obfuscated debate on autism.

And why? Why would the pharmaceutical industry go to such lengths to keep marketing vaccines to children which are almost certainly very harmful to the individual child, harmful to the child's family and community, and to the child's nation and harmful to the world at large ?

The answer is, "I have absolutely no idea! But it sure looks like that's exactly what's happening!!"

A Personal Aside
This author can relate to his gentle reader the following from his own experience - referring to the acquaintance mentioned above, someone who I have know quite a long time, and it was her young child who seemed to be developing, for lack of a better term, 'abnormally.'

This acquaintance also happens to be a special educator of handicapped children. Upon looking further into the childhood-autism-childhood-vaccination link pointed out by the citations above, this acquaintance firmly decided to immediately opt her young daughter out of all further vaccinations.

Now, about 18 months later her child is clearly doing very much better, developing quite normally in a social sense, physically very well, and has now even begun finally to talk.

I realize this is only a single case, and certainly no basis for any kind of general conclusions, but, as far as a one-out-of-one average goes, I think my acquaintance is batting a thousand ...

recommend This comment thread is now closed
Tina Kells
Tina Kells
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 12:01 on September 4th, 2008

Emilio Lizardo, I like this story. It's good stuff.

mchawk
mchawk
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:18 on September 4th, 2008

Emilio Lizardo, I like this story. It's good stuff.

It's an interesting study, but this one has pretty much fallen off the radar in the UK.  Dr. Andrew Wakefield's utterly unsubstantiated has been thoroughly repudiated. The Lancet (which published his article) retracted and disowned the article and the General Medical Council charged him with four charges of misconduct.  This Columbia U study must be the last nail-in-the-coffin for his career.

I would never want to minimise the tragedy of autism, nor would I ever side with the drug mega-corporations, but are these not two different issues, albeit closely related.

On one hand be have media hysteria over the MMR jab, on the other, we have corporations making a fortune out of misery. One's a tragedy - the other's a crime.

Great article, Emilio.

0
Emilio Lizardo

Thanks very much for the comment and link, mchawk!

It seems like the MMR vaccine, if it is 'compounded' with or 'bottled up' with or whatever they call it, with thimerosal, the mercury-based anti-fungal vaccine preservative, then this can lead to a laundry-list of neurological problems, especially in very young kids.

This thimerosal causes a 'spike' of toxic mercury to occur after the injection which many are saying causes brain damage ...

The link you provide mentions that no correlation has been found between the MMR-jabs and autism ... I am no medical expert by any stretch of the imagination, but I know a thing or two about statistics and statistical studies ... it is really shocking how easy it is to come up with whatever results your study's sponsor has indicated he'd be very pleased to see ...

And thanks for the flag!

Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:30 on September 4th, 2008

Emilio, thank you for posting this story.

0
Emilio Lizardo

Thanks for the read and the Flag, Rhonda ! Much appreciated.

lcherry
lcherry
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 14:30 on September 4th, 2008

Emilio Lizardo, thanks for putting together the different perspectives of this story. 

0
Emilio Lizardo

Thanks for flag, lcherry.

I really didn't work too hard on this, and I think this story is begging for somebody to dig up the references which actually assert the link between the first significant occurrances of autism in China and the use of American made, thimerosal-stabilized vaccines ...

0
Emilio Lizardo

After reading hawk's comment, I went back out to google and searched on these three keywords 'wakefield autism vaccines' and got 139,000 hits ...

I did not even know about the big MMR case going on in Brittain in 2003-2004, I stay up on the news here and I don't think it got much coverage in the American media at all !

Anyway, here's something, the likes of which has now become so typical in my research into these old-white-guys networks called multinational-corporations -

http://www.jabs.org.uk/.../topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=668

It is essential that anyone who was involved in the MMR litigation gives their attention to this notice

MMR JUDGE FAILED TO DISCLOSE HE WAS BROTHER OF Glaxo SmithKline DIRECTOR AND LANCET BOSS

Just three days ago I discovered while going over the records for 2004 that the judge, Mr Justice Davis (aka Sir Nigel Anthony Lamert Davis), who had dismissed the appeal over the removal of funding of the MMR litigation by the Legal Services Commission was the brother of Lancet proprietor (CEO Reed Elsevier) Crispin (Henry Lamert) Davis who at the time had also recently become a non-executive director of Glaxo SmithKline. Though this has not been reported in the media the following press announcement was issued by the judiciary yesterday afternoon:

"In 2003 Mr Justice Davis's brother was appointed as a Non-Executive Director of Glaxo SmithKline, a company which was formed as a result of a merger with Smith Kline Beecham. At the date of the hearing before Davis J, the possibility of any conflict of interest arising from his brother's position did not occur to him.

"If he was wrong, any possible remedy must be sought from the Court of Appeal."

Former litigants should complain without delay to the Office for Judicial Complaints, focussing on the GSK conflict. Clearly if the judge had said at the time that his brother was a director of GSK but he intended to hear the case anyway his decision would have been regarded with a great deal more scepticism:

http://www.judicialcomplaints.gov.uk/

They should also write without delay to their MPs, and they should contact anyone they know who was also party to the litigation, and draw their attention to this notice. It is very important that as many people do this as soon as possible.

People may like to note the sequence of events:

  1. July 2003 Lancet proprietor Crispin Davis become a non-executive director of MMR manufacturer Glaxo SmithKline
  2. February 20, 2004. The Lancet throws Andrew Wakefield to the wolves for tenuous reasons. He is dragged through the mud by the BBC and Sunday Times for four days.
  3. February 27, 2004. Mr Justice Davis dismisses the litigants appeal for restitution of funding.
  4. June 2004. Crispin Davis knighted by the Blair government.

John Stone

 

Something unrelated to the MMR issue which is made evident in the above citation is that the proprietor of Lancet, perhaps the world's premier medical journal was also a principal of a major pharmaceutical concern ... and then, in addition, there is the matter of his brother, the high court judge who derailed the MMR case ...

It's just amazing !! Do they think we're all a bunch of flaming idiots out here ? 

What are these guys smoking ????

0
bill hicks

It is the preservatives in the vaccine.  Look at www.delsite.com .  They have a new product that will be available outside the states shortly.

0
Emilio Lizardo

Yep, that's what a lot of folks feel is going on. Thimerasol is the stuff, and the pharmaceutical companies won't admit it appears to have caused a whole lot of problems not only in America, but everywhere else they've used American vaccines for childhood innoculations.

Thanks for the comment.

Paschen
Paschen
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 19:47 on September 4th, 2008

Emilio Lizardo, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Emilio Lizardo

Thanks for the flag, Paschen ... what a mess this story is !!

0
Paschen

It is in deed and somewhat surprising in a first World Nation. 

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from