NP Rank:
Hatred is turning me into a Jew
I try to avoid cut and paste reporting but this letter is in my mind quite revealing. So I am sharing it with our NP readers and supporters. Rhonda has asked me to put this up as an opinion piece. In deference to her I will add the tag.
From The Jewish ChronicleNick CohenFebruary 12, 2009The more the British Left indulges antisemitism, the more kosher I feel
My name is Nick Cohen, and I think I’m turning into a Jew. Despite being called “Cohen”, I’ve never been Jewish before. It’s not simply that I am an atheist. My Jewish friends tell me that it is hard to find an educated London Jew who is not an atheist, but that I have no connection with Jewish culture.
The Jewish side of my family is my father’s (which is not a help, I gather). My great grandparents fled from the Tsarist Empire at the time of the pogroms, but their son, my grandfather, revolted. He became a Communist and married outside the faith. My father was brought up with no connection to Judaism and, inevitably, so was I.
My sole interest in Jewish concerns came from being a left-wing opponent of the far Right, and the blood-soaked antisemitic superstitions which turned Europe into a graveyard. When I was young, such attitudes seemed unproblematic. You did not have to be a Jew to oppose fascism; everyone I knew did that regardless of colour or creed.
Today the old certainties have gone because there are two far-right movements: the white neo-Nazi parties that the Left still opposes; and the clerical fascists of radical Islam which, extraordinarily, the modern Left succours and indulges. I am not only talking about Ken Livingstone, George Galloway and their gruesome accomplices in the intelligentsia. Wider liberal society is almost as complicit. It does not applaud the Islamist far Right, but it will not condemn it either. From the broadcasters, through the liberal press, the Civil Service, the Metropolitan Police, the bench of bishops and the judiciary, antisemitism is no longer an unthinkable mental deformation. As long as the conspiracy theories of the counter-enlightenment come from ideologues with dark rather than white skins, nominally liberal men and women will not speak out.
Fight back and you become a Jew, whether you are or not. Mark Lawson recently described an argument at the BBC over the corporation’s decision not to screen the charity appeal for Gaza. His furious colleague declared that the only reason Lawson supported the ban was because he was Jewish. Lawson had to tell him that he was, in fact, raised a Catholic.
A furious Labour MP was no different when he told a colleague of mine that I had gone off the rails when I married a “hard-right” Jewish woman from North London. My friend replied that this would be news to my wife, a liberal Catholic from Stoke-on-Trent.
It was kind of him to point that out, but I would no longer protest that I wasn’t Jewish, and I don’t think Lawson should either. It is cowardly to stammer that you are not a Jew because you concede the racist’s main point — that there is something suspect about being Jewish — as you do it.
In any case, my experience of left-wing antisemitism has changed the way I think and made me, if you like, more Jewish.
Although I want to see every Israeli settlement on the West Bank dismantled, it was clear to me that when Hamas fired thousands of rockets into Israel it had declared war and had to accept the consequences. I would not have thought that five years ago.
You do not need me to add that mine is a minority point of view among liberals, and that British Jews are living through a very dangerous period. They are the only ethnic minority whose slaughter official society will excuse. If a mass murderer bombed a mosque or black Pentecostal church, no respectable person would say that the “root cause” of the crime was an understandable repulsion at the deeds of al-Qaeda or a legitimate opposition to mass immigration. Rightly, they would blame the criminal for the crime.
If a synagogue is attacked, I guarantee that within minutes the airwaves will be filled with insinuating voices insisting that the “root cause” of the crime was a rational anger at the behaviour of Israel or the Jewish diaspora.
Put like this, the position of British Jewry sounds grim. Remember, however, that the first aim of radical Islam is to subjugate Muslims. When brave feminists, gays, democrats and liberals in the Muslim world and in Britain’s Muslim communities make a stand, they, too, are accused of being the tools of Zionists.
As the struggle between theocracy and liberalism intensifies, I can see some being pushed into taking the same journey I have taken and finding their views towards Judaism and Israel softening as they realise that antisemitism helps drive the fascistic ideologies of the 21st century just as it drove the Nazism of the 20th.
I will tell them that the opponents of totalitarianism must never be frightened. If their enemies say they are Jews, they should shrug and say: “All right, I am.” As long as readers of the Jewish Chronicle don’t object, of course.
Nick Cohen is a columnist for The Observer. His latest collection of essays, ‘Waiting for the Etonians: Reports from the Sickbed of Liberal England’, is published this week
Most Recommended Comment
Recommendations (14)
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Fripouille
Lyon, France -
René
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

-1.jpg)

Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (9)
at 11:42 on February 15th, 2009
Well known in the UK as being an *extremely inconsistent* journalist.
SEE his views on US foreign policy, the invasion of Iraq, Tony Blair and George Bush just to give a few examples.
He also writes for the Daily Mail, the Evening Standard, David Horowitz's FrontPage magazine and the Jewish Chronicle and is a board member at Just Journalism (an organisation set up to argue that the British media is too critical of Israel)
In other words, not quite the independent that he's presenting himself as!
at 11:52 on February 15th, 2009
Thanks for the comments. It is his personal viewpoint. All of the information you provided is well taken. It still doesn't take away from his personal feelings about how he views himself.
Again Thanks.
at 05:16 on February 19th, 2009
ctomorfo,
Where on earth do you see him presenting himself as an "independant" here? I do not believe you read this article, or, if you did, you read it with pre-conceived ideas. He is stating opinion here and he says so, using the words "mine is a minority point of view". Do you have a problem with that?
"Extremely inconsistant". You put that in inverted commas, which means someone said that. Who said that? Moreover even if you put up a link, those words remain an individual's opinion.
What is wrong with writing articles for the Jewish Chronicle" or "Just Journalism". England is a country in which freedom of expression is permitted. Journalists are permitted to write articles supporting one cause or another. Where's the problem?
You appear to me to be insinuating something. Why can't you say what it is? Don't you agree with him? fair enough. Are you against Israeli policy? Fair enough. Don't you agree with his stance on Bush etc? Fair enough. But why can't you say so? Instead, all you can do is to try to bring him down with tacky inference. Doesn't he have the right to express himself?
If you had his courage, and were able to put your real thoughts on the line, your comment would have meant so much more.
Independant? Like you? No way. You complain about his so-called lack of "independance" but you yourself are biased but can't say so, for reasons best known to yourself.
at 04:53 on February 19th, 2009
@ectomorpho - None of what you say lessens his point a single iota. In fact, despite what seems to be a quite personal and honest account is leapt upon and attacked by virtue of his "character."
Seems his point is well made, frankly.
at 05:31 on February 19th, 2009
Thanks for this opinion piece, tikun. An opinion tag would be appropriate, I think.
at 05:39 on February 19th, 2009
Hi Rhonda, but Tikun only wrote two sentences to introduce the main body, which is highlighted and sourced as being an article taken from the press, which Tikun didn't write. I mean, I may be wrong here, but I see lots of cut 'n' stick posts with many more author's words in them but they are not tagged opinion....please enlighten me here if I have it wrong, and I hope you're well!
at 18:49 on February 19th, 2009
Hi Fripouille! I am very aware that tikun did not write the highlighted article, and that the introduction is short. I think the highlight is an Opinion however and should be tagged as such. So, if anyone needs enlightening, it could be me:)! I hope you are well too! Thank you!
at 05:40 on February 20th, 2009
tikun, good morning! I was enlightened:)! It looks as if you agree with the author. If you agree with a published essay, it is helpful to add an Opinion tag to it.:) Otherwise, it is not necessary! Thanks to Fripouille for facilitating the questioning:)!
at 05:55 on February 20th, 2009
Ah yes, I see what you mean Rhonda. In that context it's very clear. But I suppose there must be some articles which are half-fact and half-opinion, and that's more difficult to decide upon. That's why I tag everything I do as 'opinion' lol!