High Efficiency Driving

by unityblue | May 25, 2007 at 10:47 pm | 1489 views | 7 comments

Free Ways to Save Fuel and Money While Limiting Pollution and Road Rage

The first few times I turned my car off in traffic, it felt a little weird. Scary even. As I grew accustomed to it, it became more natural, and it felt like the people who were not turning off their cars at stop lights were the oddballs. After all, they were the ones with their engines running, spewing out harmful exhaust for no reason. Their cars just sat there motionless, wasting fuel.

While turning off a vehicle instead of idling will save a small amount of fuel, there are easier ways to save more! The vast majority of fuel consumption can be attributed to accelerating a vehicle up to speed. The less often people stomp on the accelerator or break, the more a person can save. What I suggest is a shift in driving style, in which a person coasts a considerable amount of time, and slowly brakes far in advance. In an average vehicle, every bit of speed and energy is simply discarded when braking, along with that sizable proportion of fuel cost. Even in modern Hybrids (HEVs) which have regenerative breaking, it is simply not possible to recover all of the energy lost to braking.

While accelerating, slowing down, and suddenly stopping cannot be completely avoided, they can be reduced dramatically. Incorporate this with smart non-idling techniques, and it is simple to dramatically lower fuel cost and pollution by 15-30%. Additionally, more conservative driving lowers blood pressure while making driving safer and more enjoyable!

Specific Techniques to Try:

Plan adequate time to reach your destination – many people who rush to reach their destinations do not make it there significantly earlier, but use more fuel, create more pollution, and create unsafe situations in the meantime.

Looking ahead – become more aware of traffic conditions, surrounding vehicles, crosswalks, intersections, and lights. During rush hour traffic, the most aggressive and the most sedate driver will arrive at their destination only a few car lengths apart – why not relax, take it easy, save some fuel, money, and pollution?

Leaving extra space – As extra space is given to the to the vehicle ahead, it becomes easier to follow the techniques below. Driving becomes a game of “how efficiently can I get there?” rather than “that car better not cut me off!”

Gradual acceleration to speed – When a vehicle is gradually accelerated up to speed, fuel is saved, and less pollution is created. Gradual acceleration and speed = less energy & fuel. Fast acceleration and speed = more energy & fuel. It is just that simple.

Watch extra traffic signals – On a block-by-block basis, look ahead to the next traffic lights and cross walk signals. Flashing “Do Not Walk” or “red hand” signals typically indicate less than 10-15 seconds before the light will change.

Braking in advance & coasting – Once familiar with watching extra traffic signals (above), it is possible to slow down when further away, before the light even turns yellow. This in turn gives a better chance of keeping the vehicle slowly moving when the light turns green again. Just think, “If I keep my wheels turning, I save money. If my wheels stop, I lose.”

Non-idling – When a person is parked at the side of the road, or knows that a particular intersection takes a while before turning to a green light, it is possible to save by turning off the engine (while in neutral and breaking). This requires extra attention to the lights (or opposing lights) and vehicles ahead to know when to start the vehicle. If idling for more than 10 seconds, it is more efficient to turn a vehicle off and start it again. Some cities are now issuing fines for vehicles idling while parked. Please check to ensure compliance with local laws, and safe vehicle operating procedures.


Of course all of this assumes that there is a true need to be driving in the first place. There are plenty of options which can reduce costs, pollution, and increase quality of life, including: telecommuting, walking, biking, public transit, carpooling, or even moving to a more central location. For instance, in 2006 I moved to a new neighbourhood – desiring a nicer and more central place. Little did I realize how seldom I would have to use my car. Grocery shopping, pharmacies, restaurants, parks, and transit are all within a few blocks walk. I can get to the vast majority of places I need or desire to go within a 15 minute walk, ride, or bus. Two years ago I would not have fathomed giving up my car – now it has been off the road for more than 6 months!


About the author:
Jay Armstrong
is the president and lead consultant of unityblue energy insight, an independent consulting firm based in Vancouver, BC, Canada. unityblue energy insight teams up with strategy & planning consultancies and non-profits to discover, launch, & implement energy and emission reduction opportunities for all levels of government and large businesses. He is involved in technology business consulting, advising, research, education, project management, and is an active Director with the BC Sustainable Energy Association.

This story is the personal opinion of Jay Armstrong, and does not reflect the views of unityblue or their clients, or any organization of which he is a member. No warrantees are expressed or implied.

 

Add a comment Comments (7)

purple

that's so informative...thanks for the infos..i'll send this copy to a family friend who i knew will be appreciated a lot..lol, i haven't notice that non idling on traffic can save fuels.. i do a lot of maintenance sinc it's necessary to be able to prevent my car from troubles..improving saturn performance parts requires having inspection with all the parts of the car.. i just hate damages on my car..quite expensive..

 

liamssoft
good stuff:

unityblue, Good stuff. Very useful info. Thanks

eastvanray

NOT GOOD STUFF

This is a perfect example of what happens when someone takes a concept with a benefit at an individual level and wrongly extrapolates it without considering the effects of scale.

Sounds great but you have to ask yourself what the impact would be if the majority of drivers practiced these techniques.  Gridlock!  That's what.  Imagine for one second what all this "slow accelerating, leaving more space and slowing down sooner" would do to traffic flow.  I want to reduce gas consumption and burn less fossil fuels but the result of these well-meaning suggestions is traffic chaos.  The same number of cars, each taking up more road space, travelling less miles per hour will take more hours.  Does that even make it a net benefit?  I suggest the added time spent driving may well cost more fuel in the long run.  Remember automobile engines have efficiency curves.  They are NOT more efficient at lower RPM.  Most maximize MPG at around 35 MPH (50 KMH) which is the maximum speed limit in most cities and suburbs.  So do not be fooled into thinking that the slower you drive the better gas mileage you get.  It just aint true.

 

 

unityblue

Interesting assumption eastvanray - I do encourage you to try some of the techniques continuously for a few months and log any improvement/decline in performance.

Although I do not suggest driving slower in itself, I suggest bringing vehicles up to speed efficently, and then "conserving" that speed energy if you can keep your tires moving.  Just follow the laws of physics - and see benefits in the real world.

eastvanray

I have tried these techniques.  For my vehicle they result in lower MPG.  My vehicle seems to get better gas mileage when I drive it a little harder.  It relates to the torque curve.  An internal combustion engine is at it's most efficient when it is being operated at the peak of it's torque curve.  For most car engines that is above 2000 RPM.  For some it is above 2500 RPM.  These PRM ranges are associated with faster acceleration but not lower fuel economy.  I have tested it with my digital MPG onboard computer.  I know it is not intuitive but it is a fact. 

But really my main criticism was relating to leaving more space in front of you while you drive.  That will result in gridlock and lower average speeds.  Fewer cars will get through each light as people leave more space between themselves, accelerate more slowly and leave more space from the car in front when leaving a light.  That will lead to more backups at each light. 

Having said that if people want to accelerate slowly and begin slowing down sooner that is fine as long as they are not holding up drivers behind them.  That means that they would have to have no cars behind them and that doesn't happen very often when I am driving in Vancouver.  Hence my issue.  I hate being stuck in traffic by slow drivers and drivers who are only converned about themselves.

 

unityblue

I hear your pain Ray, believe me, I feel it.  Whether in a car, bus, or on a bike, stop and go traffic sucks.  Herein lays a possible difference between what we are discussing.  When I used to drive in Metro Vancouver, I would see traffic piled up blocks ahead and coast up to it, hopefully with enough momentum to keep rolling.  Regardless, I knew that I was basically using less fuel than anyone around me.   It added up.  It took weeks, even months for me to train myself to do all this on a consistent basis.  It is not ideal for anyone to be stuck at a dead stop, but that is part of today's reality.  I found it almost amusing to see a car rocket ahead of me and weave in and out of traffic, only to catch up to the same car one or two lights down the road.  One of us was stressed out and using a heck of a lot more fuel, and it sure was not me.

My expression of "giving extra space" is very speed dependant - ie. while a single car-length spacing at 20kph may be fine, at 50 or 90kph it is not adequate.  While this somewhat inversely translates into a roads capacity (higher speed = more spacing ~= less road capacity), all I was getting at is that if adequate space is given, you don't need to jam on the breaks every time the car ahead lets off the gas.  In other words: Folks need to Stop Tailgating!

As for torque curves - that is the whole purpose of a transmission, to optimize the engine to the road.  As many cars today are optimized (including gear ratios) for performance and not efficiency, this may be a bit of a challenge.  It is true that there are optimal and non-optimal ranges for every gear - this is why you see CVT (Continuous Variable Transmission - eg every "gear" is optimal) in hybrid vehicles such as the Prius. An added trick for those with a manual transmission or tachometer would be to attempt to keep the tach at the optimal RPM as much as possible - it may be that folks actually need to stay in first gear longer than they realize.

At some level, this does come down to a bit of a debate between "muscle/power/play/enjoyment" of driving vs efficiency.  Again, I must attest to it being pretty thrilling to rocket up to speed.  That said, in this article I am talking only about energy efficiency, fuel savings, and perhaps stress savings.  To that end, I have certainly succeeded for myself, and some aspects are applicable to be scaled up.

eastvanray

Good points.  I have a manual automatic and can shift manually if I want.  I does help MPG a tiny bit by keeping the RPM's higher than the auto setting.  Often luxury cars and SUVs are geared for quietness and smoothness at the expense of MPG.  But don't get me started on CVTs.  I have driven one (a rental) and absolutely hated it.  No torque at all. 

I try all I can to get the best milage especially when in the city.  I drive a 4x4 and celebrate whenever the computer tells me I am getting more than 10 MPG in town.  With premium at close to $1.40 I am thinking of taking my truck to a faith healer! 

Sign In or Join Add a comment

Your email is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

May 25, 2007 at 10:47 pm by unityblue, 1489 views, 7 comments

is reporting from

closeSign in to NowPublic