Hospital Employees Tripped Up By HIPAA Laws

by Christopher Byrne | September 27, 2007 at 05:03 am
7061 views | 30 Recommendations | 4 comments

Photos

Hospital Employees Tripped Up By HIPAA Laws

Hospital Employees Tripped Up By HIPAA Laws

see larger image

uploaded by Christopher Byrne

Athens, GA (Sept 27, 2007) - The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United States is designed, among other things, to protect the confidentiality of medical records. Since the signing of the law on by President Bush on August 21, 1996, there have been many examples of bizarre interpretations of the law. In the case of this reporter, a hospital in Baltimore would not say where a parent had been discharged to because it would be a HIPAA violation. There have been stories where ambulances could not be given addresses because it was felt that it would be a violation. On the humorous side, the University of Georgia Veterinary hospital applies HIPAA laws to the treatment of horses.

In a story in today's Laramie (WY) Boomerang, it has been reported that a number of employees at Ivinson Memorial Hospital (IMH) have been terminated, suspended, or reprimanded for violating the law by reading their own records:

[q
url="http://www.laramieboomerang.com/news/more.asp?StoryID=107164"]“The HIPAA regulations, our interpretation of them … is that you can’t look at your own records or any family member records unless there is a clinical need to do so,” Interim IMH CEO Nick Braccino said. “If you are doing so just because they are there and you have a private interest, you are violating HIPAA regulations and patient confidentiality.”


No one, he said, will be terminated solely for viewing their own information. However, he added, employees who view their own information and commit other violations might face severe reprimands. Hospital administration, he said, will act as consistently as possible in addressing HIPAA violations while considering them on an individual basis.[/q]

At the Athens Regional Medical Center in Athens, GA, a different approach is taken than in the case of Ivinson Memorial Hospital. According to Lori Alexander of ARMC's Health Medical Information office, employees are allowed to view their own records. But to do so, they have to make an appointment with that office, releases have to be signed, and they may not review them unsupervised. This is done so that records may not be altered. Electronic audit trails are used with electronic records to track any and all use. If an employee finds a way around these procedures to view their own records, they will be terminated.

The key to this is education and awareness. As reported in the Boomerang:

[q
url="http://www.laramieboomerang.com/news/more.asp?StoryID=107164"]At 37 training sessions throughout the year, HIPAA regulations — including those over viewing one’s own records — have been reviewed, IMH Compliance Officer Dean Jessup said. HIPAA regulations stating that employees are not allowed to view their own or others’ records have been posted at each of the hospital’s time clocks and other well-traveled locations, Jessup said. He added that disciplinary action was taken in at least two cases against people who admitted that they were aware they were committing a violation by viewing their own or others’ records.[/q]

Eleven years after the signing of the law, it is clear that medical professionals and patients are still struggling to understand what is and is not allowed under the law. In some cases, people are losing their jobs over it.

X-Ray Photograph by Jyn Meyer of Beaverton, Oregon (USA). Used with Permission.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
Brian A Kennedy
Brian A Kennedy
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 06:40 on September 27th, 2007

Man, that's Kafkaeque!

ryan
ryan
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 06:51 on September 27th, 2007

Christopher Byrne, when a law intended to protect patients ends up interfering with their well being the interpretation of said laws need to be re-examined. Great report, it's based on first hand experience yet well researched and objectively reported.

dysamoria
dysamoria
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 07:03 on October 17th, 2007

Christopher Byrne, I like this story. It's good stuff.

i've dealt with this personally. Do you know that a patient can't get their own records? There is actually enough room in the language of HIPAA that doctors who are unwilling to give their patients access to records can just deny the request (and in my cases, these were doctors who were hostile and incompetent, one of which was known to the records department as a problem person). The records department even informed me that the HIPAA law only restates things that were already law. It has done nothing positive and allowed much freedom on the part of the information holders to take illigitimate advantage of the interpretable HIPAA language to harass or generally deny requests they don't feel like processing (political, personal, you name it). One doctor told me that while i could have my records sent to her, she could not then give them to me. Consultation with the medical records office confirmed my suspicion that this is false and that this is seen often because doctors are eager to cover their behinds in paranoid fear of being slapped with a lawsuit.

As is often the case, a law/act has been put in place with much hoohaa and little thought to how wide open and complicating it is to exercise it in real practical situations.

The more light is shown on ridiculous examples of abuse of HIPAA, such as the termination of employees for looking at their OWN records, the better. It is, if i recall correctly, our civic duty to defeat bad laws and have them replaced with better ones. It is a judge's responsibility to recognize when someone uses the letter of the law to defeat the spirit of the law (something i am acutely aware of via personal experience with said abuses). Sadly, there are lots of judges who refuse to make precedents and who will default to the most politically safe choice.... for themselves.

Thanks for the sad and amusing story! 

26
Josh McKinney

That was great. I'm doing a research assignment for one of my classes and this really helps. does anybody know any more reputable sites with information and possible testimonials? Reply would be much appreciated

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from