NP Rank:
Intellect vs. Christian Right: Who actually founded America
Republican candidates are again repeating the same false claim: That America was founded on Christianity, and that Biblical beliefs created America. They are wrong.
America was not founded on Christianity. It was founded on European Enlightenment philosophy designed by such "damn snob Europeans" as John Locke, Voltaire, and Montesquieu. And it was founded not by Christians, and certainly not by followers of Pat Robertson, but rather by "damn liberal intellectuals" such as Thomas Jefferson and Ben Franklin. It was called the last best hope for humanity for a reason: That in the darkness of Christian domination of Europe, a country was born that was not founded on Biblical supremacism but rather on reason and intelligence. And it is intelligence, and not Christianity, that made possible for America to rise as high as it did.
So it is about time that the Christian argument be put to rest. It has done nothing of any good to America or to anyone else for that matter. Instead its followers have done monumental injury to America - gutting its primary education system; defunding its academia to result in vast loss of competitiveness by its science; spreading rackets and lies all around the country; and doing away with all meaningful freedom in the Land of the Free.
What good has Christian Right done for America? All it knows to do is how to con people. Make people think that scientists are fools and sinners, and they in claiming such things while benefiting daily from science as do all Americans aren't. Make people think that there is some satanic "new world order" conspiracy running the world, when the term "new world order" was first used by Republican president George Bush Sr. to describe a world run by republican values - in his words, "by rule of law rather than by law of the jungle." Make people think that these are the end times, and that the disastrous climatic events we are seeing are not result of global warming, but end of the world or God's punishment for humanity - humanity here meaning the same liberal influence that knew about global warming and was desperately trying to tell people about global warming, and not the Christian Republicans who have denied it for this long.
What else? Use lies, fraud and corruption to impose upon America the puppet Bush Jr. regime - a Christian Republican government that, with Christian Republican Congress, put America extra $6 trillion in the hole and gave it its worst economic crisis since Great Depression. Now they are claiming that - what, it is the "damn liberal government" stealing taxpayer money? When they had the government for eight years with Bush and bloated its budget from $1.8 trillion that it was at the end of Clinton administration to $2.9 trillion that it was at the end of Bush. When "tax-and-spend" policies of Johnson, Nixon and Carter ended America with $1 trillion debt and the borrow-and-spend policies of Reagan, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. ended it with $11 trillion debt. When the only president in recent memory who gave America a balanced budget was Bill Clinton, and he was also the only president to successfully overhaul federal government to make it efficient and user-friendly - an accomplishment that was destroyed by Christian Conservatives as they blew a huge hole in the budget through their irresponsible tax cuts on super-rich while vastly increasing government spending.
How long can these people continue to lie and get away with it?
The solutions to problems caused by Christian Conservatives is not more Christian Conservatism. It is a radical break away from its ruinous dogmas and toward the real intelligence on which America is actually founded, and that has the means to solve all these problems. All of the problems of today are solvable with application of human intelligence. And it is only by embracing the same that America can resist sinking into darkness and become once again the last best hope for humanity that it was intended to be.
NowPublic on Facebook
Recommendations (8)
-
Pat Garcia
La Paz, Mexico -
Karen Hatter
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
Clotee Allochuku
Sherman Oaks, CA, California, United States -
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States

Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (35)
at 04:17 on June 18th, 2010
You set the record straight, though coming from "down under" I don't think they'll listen.
at 02:45 on June 24th, 2010
Jim, I'm not "coming" from Down Under. I lived in America for 18 years and for less than four in Australia. And I moved to Australia not to get away from America but to marry my wife.
In fact, Australia has a lot of very similar things going on as does America, so the same war is taking place Down Under as well. They may be the land of antipodes, but they have a lot in common with USA.
at 05:14 on June 18th, 2010
I agree. Amazing that these pertinent word hail to us from Australia. I know other people here who share this sentiment. We all need to speak up and stick together.
at 02:50 on June 24th, 2010
Absolutely. Here's something that a friend of mine in Texas sent me:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=49789186166
"
We are NOT a Christian Nation: Against HR 397"
If you want to get involved, feel free to do so.
at 05:48 on June 18th, 2010
Ishambat: Would it be at all possible for you to post an objective story based on fact? I've read just about everything that you've posted on NP and I've yet to see you make an honest and sincere effort at posting anything other than a bunch of leftist propaganda that very few Americans subscribe to.
You appear to have no knowledge or understanding whatsoever of American political, social, and economic history, nor do you even appear to be interested in American history. Your posts don't even allow for an open and honest debate, because they're absurd, quite frankly. I find it very curious indeed that someone from Australia is obviously obsessed with posting the type of opinion pieces on America that you do . . . .
at 08:20 on June 18th, 2010
Well, Rory, you made it fair and balanced now.
at 06:18 on June 24th, 2010
Read my responses to you. There's a lot of open and honest debate there.
Also, I am not from Australia. I lived in America for 18 years and was very much involved both in economy and in politics there. I moved to Australia because I fell in love with an Australian woman and came there to marry her. That doesn't mean that I stop caring what goes on in the country I've lived in for 18 years and where most of my friends and relatives are.
at 06:20 on June 18th, 2010
Source: en.wikipedia.org
at 02:00 on July 4th, 2010
If it was first used under Woodrow Wilson, there is nothing new about it, and you are about a century late with your concerns.
Another thing to consider is that it is about at that time that America became the world's greatest country and its leader. It wasn't that in 19th century; England was the great power of 19th century. America remained the world's great power since early 20th century.
So whatever Wilson did, worked for the benefit of United States.
at 07:03 on June 18th, 2010
"History furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government",Thomas Jefferson
When 9/11 was caused to happen and in its aftermath happened some thing strange.Pat Robertson resigned as head of Christian Coalition and no one filled the vacant post.Why?Because the Christian Coalition had a rightful head(head of all evils one can think of),George W.Bush.He was a born again Christian,a man of God and now zealout Christians were entrusted with handling all policy matters ranging from school curricula to foreign policy.So a born again Christian wanted a born again Christian America flouting the Founding Fathers chersihed dreams,America of their dreams.
The rise of the religious right is a danger signal.The difference between a president and the preacher will blur if vile conservatives are allowed to manipulate democratic mechanism and come to power again.Americans have to protect the wall erected by Thomas Jefferson between the church and the state or watch its demolition as helpless spectators.
at 07:54 on June 18th, 2010
t k: You are kidding . . .right? Have you ever lived in America? There is no rise of the religious right. And the reason for that is because religion has always played a major role in America's history. The only reason way Christians are getting political nowadays is because they are witnessing an assault on their religion and beliefs. For anyone to make the claim that the founding of America and its institutions was not based on religion to a large extent is ridiculous! You can fool some of the people some of the time by re-writing history, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time. We here in America are still allowed to read history books and historical documents. The leftists and atheists still haven't been able to burn them yet. BTW: Do you think that slavery would have ended when it did were it not for the hue and cry against it on the part of Christians? Just come right out and admit! You simply don't like Christians, nor do you like white Americans and their institutions.
at 08:22 on June 18th, 2010
Being confronted and challenged by different thinking is hard to take for those entrenched in their beliefs and who do not have any desire for change, and see no need for change. I can tolerate that.
at 09:17 on June 18th, 2010
RORY CRIPS,my friend,it doesn't make any difference whether I ever lived or visited US.You believe in Jesus Christ,but I am sure you weren't born in the same CE.
Your assertion or argument that Christians are getting political now-a-days because they are witnessing an assault on their religion and beliefs doesn't hold ground.Do you want to say that Christians were apolitical before assault on their religion and beliefs began.How and when the assault began and from which quarter?Would you please enlighten an ignorant ,that is me,on this interesting interpretation of history of religious right.
How you arrived at this definite and final conclusion that I do not like Christians,White Americans,American institutions etc.If I am critical of Hillary Clinton, I have been more of Condoleeza Rice.Who is white and who is non-white has nothing to do with my views and opinions about US foreign policy.I,for one,am sure that Jesus wasn't author or formulator of US foreign policy.And criticism of US foreign policy is not tantamount to blasphemy and which hurts a right wing Christian,self-appointed custodian and guardian of Christian religion and beliefs.
at 10:05 on June 18th, 2010
t k: Your assertions don't hold ground. And please stop making stuff up simply to further your anti-Christian and anti-American propaganda. It is true that Christians had a lot to do with things such as prohibition and the anti-slavery movement. But all your assertions in the above are based on the false premise that America since its founding and inception was not heavily influenced by Christianity and the Christian belief system. Christianity was a given here in America since day one. Virtually all Americans identified themselves as Christians. Christianity was an accepted and integral part of the American culture. It was only until the past few decades that atheists, progressives, etc. started banging the drum to eliminate all vestiges of Christianity from the public eye. If that were not the case, then how do you explain all the Christian symbols and writings and quotes from the bible that are still to this day in government buildings? And how do you explain all the references to Christianity that are contained within American political documents and writings? Again: Christianity played an integral role in the formation of America. That's just a fact. And because Christianity was accepted as an integral part of the American culture for centuries and relatively very few attacked Christianity compared to what we see today, there was no need on the part of the "Christian right" to immerse itself in politics.
at 19:16 on June 18th, 2010
Rory.Sorry,you haven't answered my basic questions.The problem with you is that you don't argue;you make sweeping generalisation,preposterous accusations and resort to slander.You have all the qualifications and aptitude of a good propagandist.
at 09:04 on June 18th, 2010
Beware of false prophets and idolatry. Look what happened to "touchdown Jesus" last week.
at 15:50 on June 24th, 2010
The past, in this case, is irrelevant. The will of the majority of people in the U.S. is for secular dealings with one and other, and separation of church and state. (Unless the "majority" simply doesn't count?) It is the Christian Right who will not just play nice and quit rocking the boat. You're not the only ones, but you are a vocal group. You have got to start getting along with the rest of us, or else we're just going to start ignoring you. Turn-about is fair play, no?
at 08:20 on June 18th, 2010
Exclamation!!!
at 10:05 on June 18th, 2010
I'm sure nobody wants to hear this but... the argument is based on opposing sides of a very flawed assumption. Neither the religious or the intellectuals founded America.
The founding of America, it's earliest creation, was through land grants for the establishment of "trade".
Due to the internal religious strife in great Britain at the time. Being by the 17th century there were close to 1000 different "Christian" religions battling over who was more "Christian" during that period. Those who felt the most persecuted took advantage of the "trade" grants to leave England and establish themselves in the "American colonies".
They had to work the land and pay[Fish, timber, corn, grain, etc.] their rent to the holders of the lease. ie: Jamestown=London Virginia Company.
The Intellectuals didn't arrive until all was made safe for them and the "wilderness" conquered by those others beneath contempt.
Classism being nothing new to the English. And the "Religious" were safely tucked into now urbanized fortresses torturing the ungodly and hunting down witches and other boogeymen/women unfit to grace the portal of Heaven.
It was the hard men. The adventurer, the social outcast, who dared the wilds to establish small farms, who traded in game and fur, harvested the forest for timber and mast, discovered the minerals.
These people "founded the country" and who with out, no country would exist. Everything else is spin. And lost to the spin most notably, is the fact that Britain "shipped" ~50,000 convicts to America prior to the landing of the Mayflower and the arrival of the "separatist" Pilgrims.
And after the hard work was done most of the colonials entering the colonies were "shipped" over as indentured servants to service the farms of the so called "religious and intellectuals" who found ways to exploit the "ignorant" and separate them from their hard earned land.
As usual the religious and the intellectuals leave out their exploitation of those they consider unworthy and claim all glory for themselves for the good of mankind. Neither of who would have survived five minutes together living rough in the early days.
trans-parere
at 03:20 on June 24th, 2010
"The Intellectuals didn't arrive until all was made safe for them and the "wilderness" conquered by those others beneath contempt. "
Intellectuals gave America its founding documents and led its revolution. Without it, the others would have remained a colony of England.
"It was the hard men. The adventurer, the social outcast, who dared the wilds to establish small farms, who traded in game and fur, harvested the forest for timber and mast, discovered the minerals. "
Whose kind is now being exterminated under the claims that they possess the sociopathic personality disorder.
"And after the hard work was done most of the colonials entering the colonies were "shipped" over as indentured servants to service the farms of the so called "religious and intellectuals" who found ways to exploit the "ignorant" and separate them from their hard earned land."
After the same had found a way to kill off the people who were there previously and steal their land, claiming them to be evil savages.
"As usual the religious and the intellectuals leave out their exploitation of those they consider unworthy and claim all glory for themselves for the good of mankind. Neither of who would have survived five minutes together living rough in the early days."
Ain't life grand?
at 12:33 on June 18th, 2010
trans-parere: Did you ever hear of the Pilgrims, Plymouth Rock and all that stuff? The earliest American colonies were settled and developed by devoutly religious Christians. Most of the laws, political systems, etc. in America's early days were designed by Christian religious leaders and other devout Christians--many of which also happened to be intellectuals. These are just facts supported by much documentation. Of course it's true that there were atheists, witches, et al. in America's founding days. But America's early colonies were essentially founded by Christians who openly practiced their Christianity.
at 15:35 on June 18th, 2010
Rory Cripps
founding:To establish or set up, especially with provision for continuing existence.
Pilgrims [broad term]did not found, see definition, America. As I previously wrote. They took the opportunity to leave Britain and practice their interpretation of Christianity by accepting agreements offered by trade companies, specifically the Mayflower/Pilgrims journey to America as colonialist with permission to settle by the London Virginia Company.
The British had established colonies in North America by 1610. Before the advent of Pilgrims coming. The Virginia colony of which they were to join was already established and populated.
Of the 102 passengers who left England aboard the Mayflower that winter of 1620 only 53 survived to see the spring of 1621. Considering that not everyone aboard the Mayflower was a religionist, many were hired hands, servants, labourers and farmers recruited by the London company. It is debatable given the loss of nearly half of the souls aboard the Mayflower how many religionist actually survived. What has survived, through the usual bastardization of American history is the myth/ legend of pilgrim as founding America. Nothing could be further from the truth but, it does fulfill the American revolutionary need to be seen as masters of their destiny and further justification for separation from British rule.
What I think you are trying to assert is the predominance of Judeo-Christian values and ethics in the establishment of American civil and criminal law. This, if it is what you mean, is true. Yet hardly an American invention. They brought that with them while they were still subjects of Great Britain and before the purification of revolution. :-)
And there was many a violent argument about just how much "Christianity" would be accepted. Again specifically the constitutional caveat, 'the separation of church and state'. The religionist did not dominate and provisions put in place so they could not dominate society.
trans-parere
at 06:11 on June 24th, 2010
"But America's early colonies were essentially founded by Christians who openly practiced their Christianity. "
As opposed to the English and Spanish monarchies, which didn't.
As I said in response to trans-pere, it was "damn liberal snob" intellectuals like Jefferson that gave America its founding documents and its revolution. And without them (as well as without the "damn" French who financed American Revolution), these colonies would have remained property of the English crown. Without these people, you would be singing long live the Queen.
Because of these damn snob intellectuals, not only America but the rest of the Western world developed democratic institutions of power. Not to mention science, without which business would have nothing of what it sells and you would not have your car or your computer or your air conditioned house.
Now, science - a government-funded, vastly Democratic, endeavor - is under attack from Christian Conservatives for being, well, government-funded and vastly Democratic. As is the rest of the government that created such things as the road system on which anti-government truckers can deliver beef made by anti-government government-subsidized farmers to their customers in big liberal cities and the Internet that has become the backbone of American business and on which the anti-government people are spouting their lies.
Meanwhile the 80s and 90s prosperity is owed to these things as well as to the computer industry, based on a personal computer model designed by a hippie and located in vastly Democratic Bay Area, Washington State and Democratic-voting areas of Northern Virginia, with Democrats the bulk of its management and its rank-and-file.
Meanwhile America's greatest period of peacetime prosperity was under Democrat Bill Clinton, its greatest wartime prosperity under Democrat Franklin Roosevelt.
Meanwhile America's greatest military victories were under Democrats Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt.
And yet Republicans are continuing to claim credit for America and portraying everyone they don't like as un-American.
This is how far from sanity American political discourse has gone.
at 19:06 on June 18th, 2010
trans-parere: America was founded by Christians. The roots for the American government--both locally, state-wide, and nationally--were established by Christians. Many Governors of colonies were Christian clergymen. Maryland was established as a haven for Catholics and so on and so forth. You need to start reading more American history and be less selective in what you read and be more objective in your thought process while you read. If you subscribe to re-written history, that's your problem. But re-written history doesn't make your assertions true.
at 20:13 on June 18th, 2010
Rory.The Founding Fathers were all Christians,you are absolutely right.But the question is:whether Founding Fathers wanted to establish a theocratic state,church and state integerated or a secular state?Presidents to preach Christianity and clergy to run the government?If it is so,then American history must be re-written by Geroge W. Bush,born again historian.
at 20:43 on June 18th, 2010
Rory Cripps
The founding of America was not a "Christian" movement. Therefore it was not done in the name of Christianity so Christians did not found America. The British, French and Spanish nations did in the such of profitable enterprise.
The United States came about through revolution; the aspirations of those separatist who came from Britain and sought to exploit the opportunity of a Europe at war with itself, and used every device including terror against their own citizenry to accomplish that separation. That the majority were practitioners of one "Christian" sect or another does not make the "founding of America a "Christian" act". Nor a "Christian" ideal. Christians killed Christians during the revolutionary war!! British Christians, German Christians and French Christians died fighting in the revolutionary war.
The founding of America was not a "Christian" movement.
The British colonies in N. America were founded by the British. Not by "Christians". It is disingenuous to portray the colonies and the further separatist rebellion as "Christian". You are hijacking the events to advance your own religious bias.
You are the one attempting a rewrite history by pushing religion to the forefront as an identifier of American colonial aspiration and rebellion for a separate nation. American colonialism was not a "Christian" ideal.
The American separation movement and the rebellion was not a "Christian" ideal.
That the ruling class that developed among the colonialist were of one Christian sect or another and shared Judeo-Christian values does translate into "Christians" founding America. In the sense of religious ideal.
If that is the case of your logic then Adolf Hitler and Nazism was a "Christian" ideal, as most Germans and the Italians where Christian. That means slavery in America was a "Christian" ideal. That means the genocide of the American native population by encroaching Americans was a "Christian" Ideal. Shall I go on? Or do you see how your religious black and white bias has brought you to the abyss.
Black and white people who think in black and white do bad things to blacks and whites in the name of black and white. It is recorded in history for all to read.
at 22:04 on June 18th, 2010
"Black and white people who think in black and white do bad things to blacks and whites in the name of black and white. It is recorded in history for all to read."love it.
at 07:35 on June 19th, 2010
trans-parere: The following are just a few quotes from America's founders. If you cannot come to the conclusion (after reading the following quotes) that America was founded by devout Christians and that Christianity played an integral role in the founding of America, then you are essentially out to re-write American history.
The First Charter of Virginia (granted by King James I, on April 10, 1606)
We, greatly commending, and graciously accepting of, their Desires for the Furtherance of so noble a Work, which may, by the Providence of Almighty God, hereafter tend to the Glory of his Divine Majesty, in propagating of Christian Religion . . . .
William Bradford
wrote that they [the Pilgrims] were seeking:
“The great hope, and for the propagating and advancing the gospel of the kingdom of Christ in those remote parts of the world"
The Mayflower Compact (authored by William Bradford) 1620 | Signing of the Mayflower painting | Picture of Compact
“Having undertaken, for the glory of God, and advancement of the Christian faith . . . .
John Adams and John Hancock:
We Recognize No Sovereign but God, and no King but Jesus! [April 18, 1775]
John Adams:
“ The general principles upon which the Fathers achieved independence were the general principals of Christianity…
Samuel Adams: | Portrait of Sam Adams | Powerpoint presentation on John, John Quincy, and Sam Adams
“ He who made all men hath made the truths necessary to human happiness obvious to all… Our forefathers opened the Bible to all.” [ "American Independence," August 1, 1776. Speech delivered at the State House in Philadelphia]
John Quincy Adams:
“Why is it that, next to the birthday of the Savior of the world, your most joyous and most venerated festival returns on this day [the Fourth of July]?" “Is it not that, in the chain of human events, the birthday of the nation is indissolubly linked with the birthday of the Savior? That it forms a leading event in the progress of the Gospel dispensation? Is it not that the Declaration of Independence first organized the social compact on the foundation of the Redeemer's mission upon earth? That it laid the cornerstone of human government upon the first precepts of Christianity"?
--1837, at the age of 69, when he delivered a Fourth of July speech at Newburyport, Massachusetts.
In Benjamin Franklin's 1749 plan of education for public schools in Pennsylvania, he insisted that schools teach "the excellency of the Christian religion above all others, ancient or modern."
In 1787 when Franklin helped found Benjamin Franklin University, it was dedicated as "a nursery of religion and learning, built on Christ, the Cornerstone."
Alexander Hamilton:
• Hamilton began work with the Rev. James Bayard to form the Christian Constitutional Society to help spread over the world the two things which Hamilton said made America great:
(1) Christianity
(2) a Constitution formed under Christianity.
“The Christian Constitutional Society, its object is first: The support of the Christian religion. Second: The support of the United States.”
"For my own part, I sincerely esteem it [the Constitution] a system which without the finger of God, never could have been suggested and agreed upon by such a diversity of interests." [1787 after the Constitutional Convention]
"I have carefully examined the evidences of the Christian religion, and if I was sitting as a juror upon its authenticity I would unhesitatingly give my verdict in its favor. I can prove its truth as clearly as any proposition ever submitted to the mind of man."
Patrick Henry:
"Orator of the Revolution."
• This is all the inheritance I can give my dear family. The religion of Christ can give them one which will make them rich indeed.”
—The Last Will and Testament of Patrick Henry
“It cannot be emphasized too clearly and too often that this nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religion, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ. [May 1765 Speech to the House of Burgesses]
John Jay:
“ Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers.” Source: October 12, 1816. The Correspondence and Public Papers of John Jay, Henry P. Johnston, ed., (New York: Burt Franklin, 1970), Vol. IV, p. 393.
James Madison
“ We’ve staked our future on our ability to follow the Ten Commandments with all of our heart.”
“We have staked the whole future of American civilization, not upon the power of government, far from it. We’ve staked the future of all our political institutions upon our capacity…to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God.” [1778 to the General Assembly of the State of Virginia]
• I have sometimes thought there could not be a stronger testimony in favor of religion or against temporal enjoyments, even the most rational and manly, than for men who occupy the most honorable and gainful departments and [who] are rising in reputation and wealth, publicly to declare the unsatisfactoriness [of temportal enjoyments] by becoming fervent advocates in the cause of Christ; and I wish you may give in your evidence in this way.
Letter by Madison to William Bradford (September 25, 1773)
• In 1812, President Madison signed a federal bill which economically aided the Bible Society of Philadelphia in its goal of the mass distribution of the Bible.
“ An Act for the relief of the Bible Society of Philadelphia” Approved February 2, 1813 by Congress
“It is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity toward each other.”
• A watchful eye must be kept on ourselves lest, while we are building ideal monuments of renown and bliss here, we neglect to have our names enrolled in the Annals of Heaven. [Letter by Madison to William Bradford [urging him to make sure of his own salvation] November 9, 1772]
At the Constitutional Convention of 1787, James Madison proposed the plan to divide the central government into three branches. He discovered this model of government from the Perfect Governor, as he read Isaiah 33:22;
“For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver,
the LORD is our king;
He will save us.”
[Baron Charles Montesquieu, wrote in 1748; “Nor is there liberty if the power of judging is not separated from legislative power and from executive power. If it [the power of judging] were joined to legislative power, the power over life and liberty of the citizens would be arbitrary, for the judge would be the legislature if it were joined to the executive power, the judge could have the force of an oppressor. All would be lost if the same … body of principal men … exercised these three powers." Madison claimed Isaiah 33:22 as the source of division of power in government
See also: pp.241-242 in Teaching and Learning America’s Christian History: The Principle approach by Rosalie Slater]
James McHenry – Signer of the Constitution
Public utility pleads most forcibly for the general distribution of the Holy Scriptures. The doctrine they preach, the obligations they impose, the punishment they threaten, the rewards they promise, the stamp and image of divinity they bear, which produces a conviction of their truths, can alone secure to society, order and peace, and to our courts of justice and constitutions of government, purity, stability and usefulness. In vain, without the Bible, we increase penal laws and draw entrenchments around our institutions. Bibles are strong entrenchments. Where they abound, men cannot pursue wicked courses, and at the same time enjoy quiet conscience.
Jedediah Morse:
"To the kindly influence of Christianity we owe that degree of civil freedom, and political and social happiness which mankind now enjoys. . . . Whenever the pillars of Christianity shall be overthrown, our present republican forms of government, and all blessings which flow from them, must fall with them."
John Peter Gabriel Muhlenberg
In a sermon delivered to his Virginia congregation on Jan. 21, 1776, he preached from Ecclesiastes 3.
Arriving at verse 8, which declares that there is a time of war and a time of peace, Muhlenberg noted that this surely was not the time of peace; this was the time of war. Concluding with a prayer, and while standing in full view of the congregation, he removed his clerical robes to reveal that beneath them he was wearing the uniform of an officer in the Continental army! He marched to the back of the church; ordered the drum to beat for recruits and over three hundred men joined him, becoming the Eighth Virginia Brigade. John Peter Muhlenberg finished the Revolution as a Major-General, having been at Valley Forge and having participated in the battles of Brandywine, Germantown, Monmouth, Stonypoint, and Yorktown.
Thomas Paine:
“ It has been the error of the schools to teach astronomy, and all the other sciences, and subjects of natural philosophy, as accomplishments only; whereas they should be taught theologically, or with reference to the Being who is the author of them: for all the principles of science are of divine origin. Man cannot make, or invent, or contrive principles: he can only discover them; and he ought to look through the discovery to the Author.”
“ The evil that has resulted from the error of the schools, in teaching natural philosophy as an accomplishment only, has been that of generating in the pupils a species of atheism. Instead of looking through the works of creation to the Creator himself, they stop short, and employ the knowledge they acquire to create doubts of his existence. They labour with studied ingenuity to ascribe every thing they behold to innate properties of matter, and jump over all the rest by saying, that matter is eternal.” “The Existence of God--1810”
Benjamin Rush:
• “I lament that we waste so much time and money in punishing crimes and take so little pains to prevent them…we neglect the only means of establishing and perpetuating our republican forms of government; that is, the universal education of our youth in the principles of Christianity by means of the Bible; for this Divine Book, above all others, constitutes the soul of republicanism.” “By withholding the knowledge of [the Scriptures] from children, we deprive ourselves of the best means of awakening moral sensibility in their minds.” [Letter written (1790’s) in Defense of the Bible in all schools in America]
• “Christianity is the only true and perfect religion.”
• “If moral precepts alone could have reformed mankind, the mission of the Son of God into our world would have been unnecessary.”
"Let the children who are sent to those schools be taught to read and write and above all, let both sexes be carefully instructed in the principles and obligations of the Christian religion. This is the most essential part of education”
Letters of Benjamin Rush, "To the citizens of Philadelphia: A Plan for Free Schools", March 28, 1787
Justice Joseph Story:
“ I verily believe Christianity necessary to the support of civil society. One of the beautiful boasts of our municipal jurisprudence is that Christianity is a part of the Common Law. . . There never has been a period in which the Common Law did not recognize Christianity as lying its foundations.”
[Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States p. 593]
“ Infidels and pagans were banished from the halls of justice as unworthy of credit.” [Life and letters of Joseph Story, Vol. II 1851, pp. 8-9.]
“ At the time of the adoption of the constitution, and of the amendment to it, now under consideration [i.e., the First Amendment], the general, if not the universal sentiment in America was, that Christianity ought to receive encouragement from the state, so far as was not incompatible with the private rights of conscience, and the freedom of religious worship.”
[Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States p. 593]
Noah Webster:
“ The duties of men are summarily comprised in the Ten Commandments, consisting of two tables; one comprehending the duties which we owe immediately to God-the other, the duties we owe to our fellow men.”
“In my view, the Christian religion is the most important and one of the first things in which all children, under a free government ought to be instructed...No truth is more evident to my mind than that the Christian religion must be the basis of any government intended to secure the rights and privileges of a free people.”
[Source: 1828, in the preface to his American Dictionary of the English Language]
Let it be impressed on your mind that God commands you to choose for rulers just men who will rule in the fear of God [Exodus 18:21]. . . . If the citizens neglect their duty and place unprincipled men in office, the government will soon be corrupted . . . If our government fails to secure public prosperity and happiness, it must be because the citizens neglect the Divine commands, and elect bad men to make and administer the laws. [Noah Webster, The History of the United States (New Haven: Durrie and Peck, 1832), pp. 336-337, 49]
“All the miseries and evils which men suffer from vice, crime, ambition, injustice, oppression, slavery and war, proceed from their despising or neglecting the precepts contained in the Bible.” [Noah Webster. History. p. 339]
“The Bible was America’s basic textbook
in all fields.” [Noah Webster. Our Christian Heritage p.5]
“Education is useless without the Bible” [Noah Webster. Our Christian Heritage p.5 ]
George Washington:
Farewell Address:
“ It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and Bible.”
“What students would learn in American schools above all is the religion of Jesus Christ.” [speech to the Delaware Indian Chiefs May 12, 1779]
"To the distinguished character of patriot, it should be our highest glory to add the more distinguished character of Christian" [May 2, 1778, at Valley Forge]
at 13:08 on June 19th, 2010
Rory Cripps
The question of this opinion piece was Intellect vs. Christian Right: Who actually founded America. In keeping with this I argued that there was no Christian intent to found America. I showed that the founding was an issue of enterprise. That the colonies were initially what we would call today Company Towns.
The intention was the economic enrichment of the British Empire. Not the establishment of a Christian nation.
1/King James was the head of the Church of England. Every proclamation has some words of Christian affect. Just like with the Catholic Pope.
2/The Mayflower Compact came about after their signing into agreement with the London Virginia Company AND after the incompetence of the ships crew to make the necessary landing at Jamestown. AND after the Pilgrims saw what they thought was 'all that uninhabited land'. In effect they reneged on a contractual obligation.
Everyone else you quoted came long after the original colonies. Most of the quotes are after the Revolutionary war.
Once again you fail to address the original question while pushing your bias as truth seeking justification in the unrelated.
Founding equals original intent. And the original intent of the founding of America was economic enterprise. Whether that was British, French or the Spanish original intent.
Intellect vs. Christian Right: Who actually founded America.
None of them. The unemployed, the leavings of the British penal system and those seeking adventure in a new land under the auspices of British merchants founded America BUT, that didn't make good history for the designers of the Revolution and the establishment of the United States.
They lacked the honesty and the forthrightness of the Australians in that regard. The founding fathers of the United States were classist land holders who used indentured labourers and slaves to enrich themselves while going on about their Christian ethic.
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie - deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.
-John F. Kennedy
trans-parere
at 06:08 on June 20th, 2010
trans-parere:
Here is the first sentence contained in the above story and it sets the entire tone and thesis of the story:
Republican candidates are again repeating the same false claim: That America was founded on Christianity, and that Biblical beliefs created America. They are wrong.
No where in my comments and replies did I state that America was founded specifically for religious purposes.What I simply pointed out was that Christianity played an integral role in the founding of America. And it can be argued that Christianity was in fact the main component to America's founding. Whether or not settlers from England came over to America under the sponsorship of British Corporations or the British government is meaningless and has no bearing on America's founding. What has bearing on America's founding is what was in the hearts and minds of those that actually founded America. And there is no doubt that those who founded America were heavily influenced by their Christian beliefs and they explicitly stated those beliefs throughout America's founding political documents. There are so many references to Christianity, the bible, etc. throughout America's founding political documents that if one were to view those documents, it would not be possible for one to come away without the impression that yes--indeed--Christianity played an integral role in America's founding.
If you want to continue to believe that the founding of America was simply for economic reasons or for reasons other than religious, go right ahead. But America's founders would tell you that you're wrong.
The extensive list of explicit quotes re Christianity, the bible, etc.by America's founders which I've provided above tells you that you're wrong. The references to Christianity, the bible, Jesus, etc. that exist throughout America's founding documents and the words spoken by America's founders re Christianity tells you that you're wrong. The fact that colonies such as Pennsylvania, Maryland, etc. were founded specifically for religious purposes tells you that you're wrong.
You are the one perpetuating the myth and the one that refuses to accept historical facts. And you do this simply because you don't like the fact that Christianity played an integral role in America's founding. If you want to re-write American history simply because it doesn't conform to your view of how things should have been in America that's your problem. And to quote JFK, re truth, myths, etc. is absurd, because if you know anything about JFK, you know that he was not truthful and that there was much myth surrounding him and his presidency.
If you want quotes before the revolutionary war, there are plenty of them out there--all containing specific and explicit references to Christianity, the bible, etc. But something tells me that no matter how many quotes you're provided with, or how much historical evidence re what was in the minds of America's founders re Christianity and the role that it played in the founding of America, you wouldn't accept them, simply because it doesn't conform to your ideology and cognitive dissonance vis a vis American history. And in any event, it's just not cool, hip, and oh so trendy to admit that Christianity played an integral role in America's founding. The facts are that yes--America's founders believed that America was essentially a Christian nation, founded by Christians, for Christians and so on and so forth. Just because people can't accept that fact doesn't make it any less true.