Johnson & Johnson told to remove Chemicals from Baby Shampoo

by Suranee | May 26, 2009 at 07:53 pm
5518 views | 17 Recommendations | 6 comments

Photos

Johnson & Johnson Baby Products

Johnson & Johnson Baby Products

see larger image

uploaded by Suranee

Over 40 groups from various health, environmental and consumer groups are asking Johnson and Johnson to remove the two chemicals 1,4-dioxane and Quaternium-15, a preservative that releases formaldehyde from their baby shampoos by the end of the year.

Johnson & Johnson's Baby Shampoo and other children's products were found to contain formaldehyde and 1,4-dioxane.


The chemical removal is being pushed by more than 40 parent, health care and environmental groups, including the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, American Nurses Association, Physicians for Social Responsibility, MomsRising, the Environmental Working Group and Friends of the Earth.

The groups want to see Johnson & Johnson remove 1,4-dioxane and Quaternium-15, a preservative that releases formaldehyde, by the end of the year.

The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics reported in March that it found Johnson & Johnson's Baby Shampoo and other children's products contained formaldehyde and 1,4-dioxane, both of which have been found to cause cancer in animals and listed by the Environmental Protection Agency as probable human carcinogens.


The spokesman for Johnson and Johnson Bill Price said many regulatory agencies around the world consider the trace levels of the two chemicals to be safe and J&J has no immediate plans to remove the two ingredients.


Johnson & Johnson spokesman Bill Price said, "The trace levels of certain compounds that were noted by the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics can result from processes that make our products gentle for babies and safe from bacteria growth. Many regulatory agencies around the world consider these trace levels safe."

Price said the New Brunswick, N.J.-based company takes concerns about its products "very seriously" and would consider meeting with the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics. He said J&J has no immediate plans to remove the two ingredients.


Laboratory tests done on Johnson's baby shampoo revealed that it contained 210 parts per million of formaldehyde.

Tests done on about two dozen other products out of 48 tested had similar or higher levels.

Johnson's baby shampoo also had a low level of 1,4-dioxane, a chemical banned by the European Union that was also found in three Aveeno baby wash products made by J&J, Johnson's moisture care and oatmeal baby washes, and about 25 baby and personal care products made by other companies.


Tests by an independent laboratory commissioned by the campaign, Analytical Sciences of Petaluma, Calif., found Johnson's baby shampoo had 210 parts per million of formaldehyde, and about two dozen other products out of 48 tested had similar or higher levels.

Johnson's baby shampoo also had a low level of 1,4-dioxane, a chemical banned by the European Union that was also found in three Aveeno baby wash products made by J&J, Johnson's moisture care and oatmeal baby washes, and about 25 baby and personal care products made by other companies.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
2
Alida Antonia Cornelius

I wish the United States was as good as the E.U. at protecting their citizens from unsafe chemicals. Big corporations have to much influence here and their Washington lobbies are too powerful.


0
Suranee

It does seem that way Art_By_Alida.

1
kate

Thanks for putting the chemicals in there in the first place. Aw, that's really great.

2
judy o

If you do any research about this, you will know that these chemicals are naturally occurring and are everywhere.  There is more formaldehyde in an apple than in J&J's baby shampoo. 

These chemicals are dangerous in high, highly concentrated quantities.  Formaldehyde was found to be a carcinogen after it was used in a highly concentrated form and in enormous quantity to preserve lab animals with.  The traces of these chemicals in products like shampoo are insignificant. 

Alcohol kills in high quantities, but one glass of wine a day has been found to be healthy.  It's a similar situation with these chemicals.

0
Amy C

judy o, thanks for your comments.  I personally feel that people are WAY too paranoid about this.  You are absolutely correct.  These chemicals are naturally-occurring and are in such small amounts in products such as J&J's baby shampoo that they could not possibly be harmful.  In fact, they're used as a bacteria killer in these products.  They're beneficial.

1
jakey12

How are any chemicals natural and safe? This country is so money and corporation based it is sickening. Why do we need chemicals in everything? for shelf life? I'd rather buy fresh anything than be concerned about how long a product will last.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Amy Judd
First Flagged at 8:01 PM, May 26, 2009 by Amy Judd
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Health

Recommendations (17)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from