NP Rank:
Legal Immunity Set for Swine Flu Vaccine Makers
Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sibelius has not only given immunity to the makers of Tamiflu and Relenza for injuries stemming from their use against swine flu, she has granted immunity to future swine flu vaccines and “any associated adjuvants”.
Read about what INJECTION of Squaline, an adjunct in swine flu vaccines does to your immune system here on an earlier Now Public post.
With the largest political lobby in Congress, the influence of powerful corporate drug interests is so great they have been able to manipulate numerous laws that protect them from liability.
They can now release a vaccine that has not passed FDA safety testing, and they will not be held liable for any damage caused.
The last time the government embarked on a major vaccine campaign against a new swine flu, thousands filed claims contending they suffered side effects from the shots. This time around, they will have no recourse.
The 2006 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (the PREP Act) allows the DHHS Secretary to invoke almost complete immunity from liability for manufacturers of vaccines and drugs used to combat a declared public health emergency.
The PREP Act removes the right to a trial jury unless a plaintiff can provide clear evidence of willful misconduct that resulted in death or serious physical injury -- and gets permission to sue from the DHHS Secretary.
But once the PREP Act is invoked to shield manufacturers from liability, the pharmaceutical firms have no financial incentive to make the safest product, and have a negative incentive to test it for safety. As long as they do not deliberately harm consumers of the product, they will not be liable for damages.
Meanwhile, while the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention hoping to have 120 million doses of H1N1 swine flu virus vaccine ready before flu season this fall, some are raising concerns over what they see as an effort to rush the drug through safety trials.The source of many of these concerns is the probability that the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal will be an ingredient in some of the doses of the new vaccine.
Groups opposed to current vaccination practices condemn thimerosal as a toxin responsible for the development of autism and related ailments in children. Additionally, the possibility that the swine flu vaccine could also contain an adjuvant, an ingredient that would allow more doses to be created from existing supplies of the vaccine, has also worried these groups.
Sources:
Anthrax Vaccine July 27, 2009
ABC News July 30, 2009
Prisonplanet.com July 30, 2009
[q url="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/08/20/Legal-Immunity-Set-for-Swine-Flu-Vaccine-Makers.aspx"]
As I’ve stated before, I’m not anti-vaccine, but rather pro-vaccine safety and choice. Both of the issues above – vaccine makers being inoculated against lawsuits, and the fast-tracking of vaccines that contain documented dangerous ingredients – are surefire ways to ensure that vaccine safety is largely ignored.
Add to that the potential for mandatory swine flu vaccinations and the probability for disaster skyrockets.
A Show of Political Power and Greed, at the Cost of Human Lives
Prior to October 1, 1988, if you or your child were injured by a childhood vaccine you were allowed to file a lawsuit against a vaccine manufacturer to receive compensation.
Because of such lawsuits, vaccines turned out to be a costly venture for pharmaceutical companies, who threatened to pull out of the vaccine business altogether.
This led to the creation of The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), the so-called “vaccine court.” This program has boosted vaccine sales growth immensely since its induction, largely because manufacturers now have zero liability for the products they produce.
If your child becomes seriously injured or dies after receiving a childhood vaccine, the vaccine maker is completely shielded from liability. Even if you’re actually awarded compensation through NVICP, it is the taxpayers who pay, NOT the vaccine makers.
But that was for childhood vaccines.
What we’re looking at now is the complete removal of liability for so-called pandemic vaccines, all adjuvants, and antiviral medications such as Tamiflu and Relenza.
In fact, ANY product used to fight "an epidemic" is protected under this law, and the government decides what drugs fit the bill.
It is a blatant demonstration of just how powerful the corporate drug interests have become. Indeed, with the largest political lobby in Congress, their influence is so great they have been able to manipulate numerous laws that now insulate them from any responsibility in harming or killing people in their relentless drive to earn profits, without regard to human health or well-being.
Think about it… They can now release a vaccine (or any other pandemic drug for that matter) that has not passed any kind of rigorous safety testing, and not be held liable for any damage that occurs as a result.
How can this possibly be in the best interest of the people?
Why Vaccine Makers Now Have ZERO Incentive to Ensure Safety
Drug manufacturers got a major boost in protection and were granted unprecedented powers to experiment on the population with the passing of the 2006 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (the PREP Act).
This law allows the DHHS Secretary to invoke almost complete immunity from liability for manufacturers of vaccines and drugs used to combat a declared public health emergency.
The PREP Act removes your right to a trial jury unless you can provide clear evidence of willful misconduct that resulted in death or serious physical injury. But that’s not all. First you must apply for and be granted permission to sue by the DHHS Secretary.
The most problematic aspect of the PREP Act is that it removes all financial incentive to make a safe product.
In fact, vaccine makers now have a negative incentive to test it for safety, because if they are aware of problems, then they could potentially be held liable for willful misconduct!
As long as they can prove they “didn’t know” of any problem, they will not be liable for damages. Hence it’s in their best interest to know as little as possible about the adverse reactions it might cause.
It seems unimaginable, but you and your children are now being enlisted as an unpaid human trial subjects for experimental, fast-tracked vaccines.
As GlaxoSmithKline stated earlier:
"Clinical trials will be limited, due to the need to provide the vaccine to governments as quickly as possible. Additional studies will therefore be required and conducted after the vaccine is made available." [Emphasis mine].
This means that any time you get vaccinated you essentially agree to be a human guinea pig, and if your health suffers you have virtually no legal recourse whatsoever.
Do You Know What’s in That Flu Shot?
Most seasonal flu vaccines contain dangerous levels of mercury in the form of thimerosal, a deadly preservative that is 50 times more toxic than regular mercury. Most of the swine flu vaccines will also contain thimerosal, although they will reportedly make a limited number of doses available that are thimerosal-free.
If taken in high enough doses, thimerosal can result in long-term immune, sensory, neurological, motor, and behavioral dysfunctions.
Disorders associated with mercury poisoning include:
- Autism
- Attention deficit disorder
- Multiple sclerosis
- Speech and language deficiencies
It can also predispose adults to neurological problems such as Alzheimer’s disease and dementia.
His comment continues onhis website.
NowPublic on Facebook
Recommendations (32)
-
everchanging
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Beaulieu
London, United Kingdom -
jjenet
Ilford, Essex, United Kingdom -
Babel-Fish
Negros Oriental, Philippines -
158
St. Louis, Missouri, United States


Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 19:33 on August 21st, 2009
very excellent information.
Thanks.
at 21:40 on August 21st, 2009
I'm glad you appreciate knowing about it, 158.
at 22:05 on August 21st, 2009
A whole new economic-business opportunity has been made around a weak flu pandemic, it's good for the economy and good for the deep pockets of elitist politicians. Hype has been used to sell medical products and of course certain international companies are and will do well on the international stock exchange.
Now we see the WHO change tracks
Source: guardian.co.uk
Of course WHO is now worried about UK hotline advertising serves for Tamiflu, it becoming to be seen as dangerous as people with no medical qualification are prescribing a drug that has side effects and also there has been an out break of Legionaires disease that has the same syphtoms.
Then we have GlaxoSmithKline agents advising and steering governments and of course WHO it self.
Source: my.nowpublic.com
When one looks at the hype and the stupid things most governments have said, done such as UK's hotline and the preparation plans for mass graves it looks like a very sad comedy.
One thing for sure if the world did see a real out break of a killer virus, we could not trust any of the organization concerned to contain it. Our international Pharmaceutical companies are more interested in making money out of misery and hyping the effects of cross over species flu viruses. Our politician's are looking to make personal profit and they have allowed this internation scam go beyond the boundaries of common sense its become a total comedy.
at 22:23 on August 21st, 2009
Thank you very much for posting the WHO and UK information, Babel-Fish.
Dr. Joseph Mercola, at www.mercola.com keeps adding good information to his terrific archive on swine flu, here
I have found that good hygiene and potent natural remedies are the best route to take for any viruses.
at 20:46 on September 30th, 2009
Our Pediatrician said the average US child sees a Pediatrician 1x per month with flu like symptoms. Coming up I don't think I saw the Dr but once every 3 years. This is evidence that these vaccination programs are either not working or are counter productive. I'd say they now need to go beyond the questions of efficacy and safety and address the queston of whether they are spreading the flu with their vaccines. Its straighforward logic. These companies manufacture virus, so they start out by adding to the world's supply. Its also well know that people are actually contageous by proximity for the very thing they've been injected and this occurs immediatly after they've been injected. This implies that functional virus escapes the body. They vaccinate the mother, they vaccinate the baby, they vaccinate the bovine that gets consumed, it wouldn't suprise me if this stream of virus were effluging from storm drains and wafting on the wind.