Truemors
is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
Minnesota Case With Biased Judge Submitted to Supreme Court
Share:
by Standtall | July 24, 2009 at 06:53 am
3479 views | 41 Recommendations | 8 comments
Photos
Videos
JULY 24, 2009 NEWS HEADLINEMinnesota Case With Biased Judge Submitted to Supreme Cout
Douglas M. Bourne and Paula Bourne of Rosemount, MN have filed a Petition for Review of Decision of Court of Appeals with the Minnesota Supreme Court.
Trial Judge James A. Fabian of Houston County Minnesota is accused of violating the U.S. Constitution’s Equal Protection of the Laws not even reading the petitioners’ ANSWER with surprisingly asking during the middle of trial: “Just so I am clear, is asbestos also an issue here?” “Asbestos” was mentioned ten times in petitioner Paula Bourne’s ANSWER.
The Bourne’s have submitted conclusive taped [CD] evidence to the Minnesota Supreme Court of judicial bias, judicial canon violations, along with additional evidence all suggesting respondents' Elizabeth Lubinski's, Susan J. Gallas', Rick Lubinski's and Minnesota Trial Judge James A. Fabian's total disregard for the Bourne's U.S. and Minnesota Constitutional rights addressing this leveraged, forced property sale involving hazardous lead paint & asbestos with Judge Fabian on the CD pressuring the Bournes:
“Other than the moral issue you have with selling this house to somebody that might have children which is the same as eighty percent of the other hundred year old houses in the city of Winona at this time. It’s not the only house in the city of Winona with newspaper in the wall. I went down to my mother’s house and drilled a hole in her wall and put an outlet in for a dryer and there was newspaper in the wall. She is eighty-nine years old so it obviously hasn’t affected her too much -- the lead-based paint and the newspaper in the wall. So why not just sell the house and get it over with.”
Douglas M. Bourne submitted hazardous asbestos, perjury evidence, along with a certified trial transcript copy to Houston County Attorney, Suzanne Bublitz and Trial Judge James A. Fabian clear back in April and May of 2008. The Bourne’s claim the Trial Court record was altered and twisted in the Appellate Court’s decision. Constitutional Rights violations, Judicial Canon violations and Trial Court perjury were all discarded by the Minnesota Appellate Court’s June 16, 2009 decision. To this point the Bourne's claim to have only received injustice with biased & prejudiced decisions.
The Bourne’s want justice to prevail; however, justice needs to show its face quickly at the Minnesota Supreme Court. Unfortunately, only five percent of the PFR cases are reviewed by the Minnesota Supreme Court.
Petitioner Douglas M. Bourne states he has such respect for the judiciary working as Senior Publishing Specialist and Federal KeyCite Analyst for Thomson Reuters in Eagan Minnesota. He describes this disgusting judiciary injustice as being very hard on him. Douglas is often in charge of adding United States Supreme Court history. Douglas proudly displays a United States Supreme Court coffee cup, gift, on his desk at Thomson Reuters, North American Legal, in Eagan Minnesota.
JULY 27, 2009 [UPDATE]
Respondents have elected not to respond. The Petition for Review is now fully submitted to the Minnesota Supreme Court. Supreme Court's decision will be forthcoming.
Minnesota Board on Judicial Standards are going to investigate and examine the CD and other evidence regarding Minnesota Judge James A. Fabian's conduct in this case.
Read Minnesota Appellate Court Debacle; Supreme Court Needs To Fix
Link:
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/minnesota-appellate-court-debacle-supreme-court-needs-fix
AUGUST !, 2009 UPDATE:Minnesota Supreme Court: WE DO NOT CARE, PETITION DENIED
See Below Link:
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/minnesota-supreme-court-we-do-not-care-petition-denied?v=1250177992.97
What is NowPublic?
NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.
Crowd Power
Standtall
Lakeville, Minnesota, United States
Most Recommended Stories in Health
Recommendations (41)
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States
158
St. Louis, Missouri, United States
duo
Stone Mountain, Georgia, United States
Spydermonkey
huntsville, Alabama, United States
Anonymous users (33)
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (8)
at 19:25 on July 24th, 2009
"Just so I'm clear," does this show concern for justice on the part of this judge? NOT.
Thanks for the news.
at 05:41 on July 25th, 2009
This judicial behavior has gone against everything Douglas M. Bourne stands for. He stated that it has been very hard on him.
Unfortunately, Douglas was completely taken by surprise on June 16, 2009. The Minnesota Appellate Court's decision was covering up for and protecting this judge. In reading the June 16, 2009 decision it actually states on p.9: "The record does not support a claim of judicial misconduct."
Thanks for commenting.
at 09:09 on July 30th, 2009
It will be interesting to see what the supreme court says.
at 14:10 on August 3rd, 2009
what are the 10 empty pages for?
at 16:46 on August 3rd, 2009
The top ten comments on what the public feels a judge shouldn't do.
Thanks,
Spydermonkey...Hopefully this is better...
at 09:46 on August 4th, 2009
MUCH :)
at 15:03 on September 5th, 2009
Shades of a Texas Death Penalty case: TX's highest criminal court ruled that just because the defense attorney FELL ASLEEP during the trial, the defendant was "adequately" represented.