Mitt Romney’s Abortion Business Made Him $50M

by karenfish | July 18, 2012 at 05:39 am
44801 views | 19 Recommendations | 156 comments

Photos

Mitt Romney’s Abortion Business Made Him $50M

Mitt Romney’s Abortion Business Made Him $50M

see larger image

uploaded by karenfish

by Karen Fish

Truth is stranger than fiction. You can’t make this stuff up because nobody would believe you. Mitt Romney’s business record is his chief qualification to be President, he says. Did you know that Mitt Romney’s business was the abortion business, from which he made $50 Million burning aborted fetuses through his company Stericycle?

 

When Mitt Romney was sworn in as Governor of Massachusetts on Jan. 2, 2003 he was Pro Choice. Mitt Romney was so pro choice that he was in the abortion business. Did Mitt Romney campaign when he ran for Governor that his chief qualification to be Governor of Massachusetts was that he was the owner of the largest aborted fetus incineration company in the United States of America? Mitt Romney’s Romneycare, the blueprint for Obamacare provided tax payer funding for abortions, which Obamacare does not. Mitt Romney introduced Romneycare to get the taxpayers to pay him personally as the owner of Stericylce to burn aborted fetuses.

 

Mitt Romney went on national television on five channels this week to publicly tell the American people that he absolutely left his company Bain Capital in Feb. 1999. When the Huffington Post reported on the Romney abortion scandal earlier this year Mitt Romney’s campaign and Bain friends said that Mitt had nothing to do with it because Mitt left Bain Capital in Feb. 1999 and they knew that Romney’s companies did not buy Stericycle until November 1999 when Mitt had severed ties with Bain Capital they said.

 

Now David Corn a brilliant hard hitting journalist for Mother Jones in the mold of Woodward and Bernstein, Redford and Hoffman who uncovered the Watergate scandal that proved that Richard Nixon was a b & e artist and chased him from the White House, David Corn has uncovered documents which show that Mitt Romney signed personally for the purchase of Stericycle in Nov. 1999, had sole  voting and dispositive power and on the Bain Capital 2002 SEC filing Mitt Romney is listed as the sole shareholder, CEO, President, and Fetus Burner.

 

Mitt Romney is only going to release his 2010 and 2011 tax returns he just told America. When in 2008 Mitt Romney auditioned to become war hero Senator John McCain’s Vice President pick Mitt provided John McCain with 23 years of his tax returns which show exactly when and how Mitt Romney made $50 Million on his investment in Stericycle. This is why Senator McCain recently said that Sarah Palin was a better choice for VP than Mitt Romney. The Republican Party, the self proclaimed Pro Life party is running Mitt Romney, the biggest owner of the fetus disposal arm of the nation’s abortion clinics.

 

Mitt Romney’s business record is his chief qualification to be President, he says. Since when did outsourcing jobs to China and disposing of fetuses put a person in a position to continue pulling the American economy out of the ditch George W. Bush drove it into by cutting Mitt Romney’s taxes and waging two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan paid for with trillions of dollars of borrowed and printed money taking us from the Clinton surplus to the Bush jobs depression?

 

In case the GOP wakes up and runs Mitt Romney out of the country on a rail Mitt will be fine because his abortion millions are stored in Bermuda, the Cayman Islands and Switzerland  safe from the arms of the tax man. To now tell the American people that he is pro life, you have to admire Mitt Romney’s chutzpah or just ask yourself if he is just a plain ordinary bully, liar and sociopath. The real question is why are we still listening to Mitt Romney let alone voting for him?

Interfaith Harmony 

 

 

 

 

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
9
Doc Vega

Oh really, so we should instead vote for another 4 years of Obama okay let's get him to release the rest of his stock transaction records ala Tony Rezko and Michelle's non existent 300,000 a year hospital job that evaporated once she left for the 08 campaign. Let's see how much higher Obama can bump up the unemployment rates to while he wrecks the country with tax increases and the radical. work of his czars! Sure, what a great choice we have in Obama.

7
Moishe Jakobi

Well, at least Obama doesn't burn fetuses, Doc Vega.  I'll stick with Obama, b/c he'll be out in four years no matter what.  If Romney the Fetus Burning Baby Killer gets in, there could be 8 years to suffer through..  He'll probably retrofit the White  House with a fetus incinerator, too, or maybe just barbecue the fetuses for his baby eating Mormon cult friends.

9
sq

Yes, Obama has, does and will incinerate many fetuses.  Obamacare will put the abortion holocaust in even further overdrive (over 53 million babies killed since Roe v. Wade).Obama/Romney-Whatever-Care for America will also burn old men and women.  Just like the British healthcare system euthanises over 100,000 people a year because they can't afford to keep them alive.It's the Ron Paul R3volution or all humanity loses.  Period.

1
karenfish

What is obvious is that people who are pro life have no candidate to vote for. However according to the National Catholic Reporter article below, President Obama is more pro life than Mitt Romney who they call the pro abortion candidate, stating that there will be far fewer abortions under President Obama than under Mitt Romney.

0
A friend of Jesus

Tom Hoefling-  American Party- Mr. Tom Hoefling is a very Godly Man and is completely Pro-life and firm on His foundation to protect lives, religous freedoms, and to restructure our economic condition in the US. He is in the Presidental race

1
karenfish

Stericycle Incinerating Fetuses Since At Least 1991: 


The Timeline: Some people are saying that Stericycle did not begin incinerating fetuses until 2007, or 2003 etc. So explain this article from the Seattle Times Aug. 15, 1991. 

Medical-Waste Firm Hit With Violations -- Company Building State Treatment Plant Is Cited In Arkansas

http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19910815&slug=1300083  

The Seattle Times 1991 article says: "Stericycle Inc., a company building Washington state's first medical-waste recycling plant in the Cascade foothills, has been slapped with 11 violations and nearly $1,600 in fines for unsafe working conditions at its Arkansas operation...- Body parts, fetuses and dead experimental animals - pathological waste the company accepts as a convenience to its clients - were stored, until incineration, in an unmarked cooler, putting employees at risk."


0
LN

Can you verify your 'facts'?

0
karenfish

Breaking News:  

Do you remember the part of the article that said: "In case the GOP wakes up and runs Mitt Romney out of the country on a rail..." Guess what? The GOP woke up. Because of the Romney Abortion profiteering there is now a GOP "Dump Romney" at the convention movement gathering steam. Look:

http://www.mmdnewswire.com/romney-hiding-bain-abortion-profits-116358.html  

It's being headed by former California GOP State Whip Steve Baldwin. The best is the quote from Dr. Gary Cass Mr. Baldwin's co sponsor of "Dump Romney": Dr. Cass says: "Dr. Gary Cass, a Presbyterian minister and Baldwin's co-spokesman in the "DUMP ROMNEY" push said, "It seems the Republican Party is on the very brink of nominating a man who's hiding a bloody record of such Biblical proportions, it would make Herod blush. We fear that Mitt Romney's secret tax returns will show that he has financed and profited, like some ancient priest of Moloch or Baal, from the burning of human babies, from child sacrifice. If that's so, could the GOP sink any lower than to nominate this man?"

These are the leaders of the GOP speaking. Imagine if Mitt the Abortion Profiteer is nominated what the Democrats will do to him with all the evidence they are holding in their pocket. 


Here are your other credible sources:

National Catholic Reporter, on Pope Benedict's twitter account @PopeBXVI which calls President Obama more pro life than Mitt Romney and Mitt Romney a Pro Abortion Abortion Profiteer.

http://ncronline.org/news/politics/which-presidential-candidate-truly-pro-life  

Mother Jones:

Romney Invested in Medical-Waste Firm That Disposed of Aborted Fetuses, Government Documents Show
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/07/romney-bain-abortion-stericycle-sec 


Check out the Pro Life "Campaign to Stop Stericycle; reproving and exposing Stericycle for its Abortion Collaboration". Mitt Romney bought, owned and later sold this company for a $50M profit.

http://www.stopstericycle.com/2012/07/25/stericycles-burning-of-aborted-babies-at-north-carolina-incineration-plant-exposed/


Today, Aug. 23, 2012 the Pro Life Group Renew America, Campaign to Stop Stericycle, today they called for Mitt the Twit to step down because of his ownership of Stericycle, expanding it into the largest fetus incinerating company in the US and making millions doing it.

http://www.stopstericycle.com/2012/08/23/css-calls-on-mitt-romney-to-withdraw-from-race-for-investing-in-company-burning-aborted-babies-and-for-remarks-supportive-of-aborting-rape-babies/ 







8
Wild Will

Ron Paul IS still a candidate and he is pro-life, as an ob/gyn that has delivered over 4000 babies.  If the media wasn't so prejudiced against him (because they're owned by the big corporations), more people would know what's going on...pro-life, pro-freedom, anti-war, US Air Force veteran (only veteran running), smaller government, CUT 1 TRILLION in spending mainly by getting OUT of all these useless and illegal wars...I really CAN'T figure out what's wrong with that platform.  100% the OPPOSITE of  'Obummer and Rmoney',  two peas in a pod...

1
karenfish

Mitt Romney is the presumptive nominee. This article and the article in the National Catholic Reporter quoting David Corn's article from Mother Jones is Mitt Romney's achilles heel that can stop him from the nomination. Why isn't Ron Paul jumping on this and taking the nomination away from Mitt Romney?

1
Scott Kuehne

As a RP supporter I hate to say it but he doesn't attack Romney because he never was in it to win it. His lousy neocon run campaign manager just came out and said as much. Really his only purpose was to suck young naive people into the Republicon party, telling them they could change Satan by joining him.

0
karenfish

The debates and the election will be a first punch knockout if President Obama says to Mitt Romney on the first question, "So, Mitt how much did you make on Stericycle. I heard $50 Million dollars, is that true?" Then President Obama can hold up the smoking gun uncovered by David Corn, the Nov. 1999 document on which Mitt Romney signed personally for the purchase of Stericycle. 



0
messianicdruid

A vote for Ron Paul is still better that voting for tweedledee or tweedledoom. He's not perfect, but he has been saying the same things for thirty plus years!

0
karenfish

He gave up.

0
Dan Vincent

Patience...

0
karenfish

is a virtue.

1
Dave Levine

Excellent piece by you, Karen! Conservatives all across the blogosphere are debating it as I write this. Actually, there are at least two pro-life third party candidates running--The Constitution Party's Virgil Goode and The A'sIP's Tom Hoefling.

0
karenfish

Thank you so much David.

0
Dave Levine

You're very welcome, Karen!

0
Teriqua Jones

Karenfish, Obama is currently in a court battle with the Catholic church.  Why? Because Obama is attempting to mandate all companies, churches and organizations to pay for birth control, including abortions.  On the other hand, Obama has paid actors to appear on commercials proclaiming their fear of Mitt Romney because he is anti-abortion.  If you watch television, you have seen these.How dare Obama use tax-payor money to fund abortions.  We are still a Christian nation and abortion is frowned on by the Christians I know. I can't find the article you referenced.  

0
lockewasright

Heck, romneycare PAYS for abortions!  

2
Dobroist

Right on!!!  Ron Paul, or noone at all!

0
Ben Midulla
1
Mike Harris

Euthanasia is illegal in the UK. You should probably give up mainlining Tea Party websites and check back into the reality based community.

0
Mary Aseltyne

sq(not verified) how wrong are you, let me count the ways...Obama is not responsible for Roe v Wade. Obamacare does not cover abortion on demand. Brits do not euthanize people. Ron Paul is a Satan worshipper. (Anyone that names their son after 'Choose Jesus or Me' Ayn Rand worships the devil) You are on the wrong side of everything.

0
Hamilton

Your comment was hilarious to read.  Thanks for the chuckle.  BTW, Ron Paul did not name Rand Paul after Ayn Rand.  The name on Rand Paul's birth certificate is Randal.  His wife gave him the nick name Rand, with no association to Ayn Rand. Check your facts.www.youtube.com/watch?v=oD-R_OeP6tU There is a difference between respecting some of the ideas that a person espoused while denouncing the ones you disagree with (as Rand Paul has done with Ayn Rand and holding onto his pro-life stance), and blindly thinking that because someone agrees with a few ideas from another person that it is a blanket endorsement for the other persons entire social, philosophical, and political outlook.  I am not a Rand Paul supporter BTW, just happen to agree with some of the things he believes, while denouncing others I don't.

1
bping

CAN YOU LEAVE RELIGION OUT OF THIS? NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT HOW YOUR JEWISH FAITH SPONSORS FOREIGN WARS AND KILLING OF INNOCENT PALESTINIANS

0
karenfish

Interfaith Harmony the Only Way

http://www.interfaithharmony.com/   

1
karenfish

The National Catholic Reporter calls Mitt Romney a Pro Abortion Abortion Profiteer

http://ncronline.org/news/politics/which-presidential-candidate-truly-pro-life 

The article is posted on Pope Benedict's Twitter Account @PopeBXVI

as in Infallible, incapable of error the Catholic Pope Benedict XVI

1
SirDom

Don't be misled... do you really think the Pope is the one updating his Twitter account all day, if he even uses it at all?  And even then, it wouldn't be infallible... there are plenty of conditions for that, you know, and the Pope rarely speaks infallibly, much less about which specific candidate Catholics must vote for in a political election. www.catholic.com/tracts/papal-infallibility  And everyone knows the NCReporter for a long time has supported the Democratic Party and all things liberal... so who are they to judge that the Republican candidate is less pro-life?  Just 3 days after he was in office, Obama overturned the "Mexico City Policy," allowing abortions overseas to be funded with American taxpayers' dollars.  And that was just the first thing he did...

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Anonymous
First Flagged at 5:40 AM, Jul 18, 2012 by Anonymous (not verified)
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (19)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from