Truemors
is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
More stomach cancer patients in Kashmir
Share: 
by Suranee | March 26, 2009 at 03:01 am
470 views | 0 Recommendations | 4 comments
Bicarbonate of soda has been used to help fight cancer. A doctor in Italy by the name of Tullio Simoncini has been using it to cure cancer tumors in his patients.
Most of us are going to be surprised to find out that there is an oncologist in Rome Italy, Dr. Tullio Simoncini, destroying cancer tumors with sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) [1]. Sodium bicarbonate is safe, extremely inexpensive and unstoppably effective when it comes to cancer tissues. It's an irresistible chemical, cyanide to cancer cells for it hits the cancer cells with a shock wave of alkalinity, which allows much more oxygen into the cancer cells than they can tolerate. Cancer cells cannot survive in the presence of high levels of oxygen. Sodium bicarbonate is, for all intent and purposes, an instant killer of tumors. Full treatment takes only days, as does another cancer treatment that heats the cancer cells with laser generated heat. (At bottom see combining ph shift with heat.)
Therefore, I'm quite surprised to hear that noon chai tea which contains bicarbonate of soda is one of the factors that contributes to stomach and food pipe cancer.
"In Kashmir spices and fried food are consumed on a large scale. For the last 20 years, Kashmir has been suffering from militancy exerting mental pressure on people here. This is resulting in increase in stomach cancer patients," said Shabir Ahmad, relative of a cancer patient.
Besides traditional food habits, intake of Kashmiri tea known as noon chai that contains sodium bicarbonate, is also being attributed to the spurt in number of stomach and food pipe cancer patients.
"Stomach and food pipe cancers are widely found in Kashmir as compared to other cities of India. We are probably one of the places in the world where these cancers are found in large numbers," said Dr. Showkat Zargar, Cancer Specialist and Chairman of Cancer Society of Kashmir.
What is NowPublic?
NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
at 08:16 on March 26th, 2009
This story sounds extremely fishy to me. In fact, my mother died of lung cancer after paying a similar charleton $12,000 after all cancer treatments had failed for her.
She had tried everything else and her last desperate hope for life, was someone like this guy whom she had found advertised in some magazine. If I'd known about it before they spent the money, I'd have been able to spot this guy immediately, but as it was, she kept it to herself.
Let me ask you a question Suranee, if bicarbonate of soda was able to cure cancer, don't you think it would be all over the newspapers?
Inappropriate, misleading articles such as this, fool cancer sufferers into believing that cancer now has a cure.
This is shameful reporting - did you even do any other research on this story Suranee?
Well I did:
Know the Cause.com
IstheCauseofCanceraFungus.com
Cancer Therapy
Unsurprisingly, all the above websites belong to 'Dr. Simoncini.' He is also trying to convince the public that cancer cells are a fungus.
NOT TRUE!
Here are a few other websites worthy of reading, regarding this 'treatment'.
Be Wary of Simoncini Cancer Therapy
by Rob Koene, M.D., Ph.D., and Sophie Josephus Jitta
Source: cancertreatmentwatch.org
Cancer is Not a Fungus
Source: 123hjemmeside.dk
Debunking Baking Soda as a Cancer Cure
Source: adenoidcysticcarcinoma.blogspot.com
Again, unsurprising.
I believe that as writers for Now Public, we owe our readers the TRUTH and not some unverified article about someone who denies anything good about cell research and calls these cells - fungus.
NONE of this is true.
It's in your own interests as a reliable writer Suranee to do more research on such articles, so that desperate cancer sufferers don't rely on such hocus-pocus, hoping to be cured in ways that NO reliable research team can verify.
SHAME!
~ Swan
at 15:45 on March 26th, 2009
I'm sorry to hear about your mother Swan, my mother died of cancer too: blood cancer.
My intention was not to promote the use of bicarbonate of soda to be used as a cancer cure. I posted this story to show that one doctor had recommended it whereas in Kashmir, noon chai tea which contains baking soda has been linked to cancer.
I thank you for pointing out that my story was not properly researched but again, any comments were welcomed to add more information to the story, to which you have but in a quite angry and insulting way. I did not expect that here at NowPublic although I do remember that in another story of mine a member had made a very angry comment to my story.
I apologize to you and everyone else who thought that I was promoting the use of bicarbonate soda to cure cancer, but I was in no way trying to do so.
at 08:23 on April 26th, 2009
Swan,
The shame and mass fraud is the established medical profession killing people with unbearably expensive, and totally ineffective (and poisonous) treatment like chemo and radiation.
After the 'establishement' has finished with these poor people, they turn to alternatives in desperation.
My partner has cancer - and the sense not to be defrauded .. and killed ... with chemo or radiation. He has chosen to take sodium bicarbonate, and the results are encouraging.
Before you continue to misinform the general public, perhaps you should do some research yourself.
Ros
at 13:20 on June 20th, 2009
You should be ashamed of yourself Shawn! It looks like you begrudge that your mother spent $12,000 of her own money on an alternative cancer treatment when traditional medicine gave up on her. She was right and you are wrong.
I do not know whether sodium bicarbonate can cure certain kinds of cancer or not. But for sure it is not more dangerous than the cancer treatments offered by the medical pharma complex, and much much cheaper. When I am reading the vehement put down of this treatment I can not help but remember how the medical establishment derided and hurt the Australian doctor ~20 years ago who claimed that ulcer is caused by a bacteria, e-pylori, and he could cure that with a single regimen of plain antibiotics. The medical porfession was outraged, called him a quack, same as they are doing with Simoncini. As it turned out he was absolutely correct and got a Nobel prize later for his discovery. The reason the medical-pharmaceutical establishemnt attacked him and called him a quack is because they wanted to protect their billion dollars worth of Tagamet/Zantac profits. I am a scientist by training, but I do not believe that what is called science in the medical and pharma field today can be rightfully called scence. It is totally driven by financial interests, and has been discredited many times in the past. Not to mention that the "double blind studies" that are always called for are totally unscientific, as anyone who knows anything about statistics knows. Applying statistics to durg studies based on a sample of 50 or a 100 is a fraud or a farce, take your pick.