Multiverse vs universe; fantasy vs reality

Yesterday, i watched an interesting video about multiverses and conventional physics. Mom fell asleep. She didn't benefit from the film nor my scoffs and snide remarks. i deleted the video after watching it only now regretting that because i don't have the exact title. No matter; i found one on youtube just as informative/silly, depending on your POV. It's here. Please watch all 44 minutes then read this article. John Horgan wrote that about a year ago. He has some very good points. i'll let you draw your own conclusions but i need to discuss some things.

There are serious dangers to allowing this trend to continue. First and foremost is wasteful funding. The Department of Energy was one sponsor of the film i watched. The Department of Energy. Supporting a fantastical research program. One that can never be proved. That's not science. It's philosophy and speculation at best. As mentioned several times in other articles/booklets, the Large Hadron Collider, ostensibly looking for the Higgs boson, a hypothetical particle, euphemistically called the God particle, with approximately 20 billion (US equivalent) spent on it over its lifetime, will never ever detect one. Why? Because they simply do not exist.

As John implies, misleading our youth is another important reason to avoid this expensive quagmire of delusion. How many generations of scientifically inclined youngsters will be misguided and shackled by this insanity? It's as if we're: taking all budding scientists from birth, physically blinding them with nails in their eyes, then beating their ears until they bleed and no longer function. i'm not exaggerating.

Perhaps we ourselves are the greatest losers by allowing this philosophical drivel to be passed off as science. If we lived in a so-called multiverse, there'd be no accountability and absolutely nothing unique about us. We could blow ourselves to kingdom-come and the multiverse wouldn't care less; there'd be another copy of us somewhere else to carry on. Bullshit. Patent bullshit.

They're desperate; they realize their model's totally failing with non-detection of the Higgs, with non-detection of gravitational waves, with no way to explain inflation other than this insane grasp at the final delusional straw: multiverse. The bottom line is: conventional scientists will adopt any theory that does not involve a Prime Cause / Creator.

But this desperate grasp at delusion cannot save physical science from catastrophic failure, cannot save humanity from itself, and cannot lead us down a rational and realistic path to sustainability. Only the truth can do that: that we are unequivocally unique, that each life is so precious – it's impossible to measure the value, that if any creature disappeared from birth – would irrevocably change all history, that we are so interconnected and interdependent – we don't realize we belong to a single organism, and that life is essentially God recreating Itself.

i can't prove to you the statements above are correct.. You must decide for yourself how to look at things.. ^^ All i can do is try to present the pros and cons.. Multiverse = meaninglessness; universe = Meaning.

A video version can be found here.