Obama Wants Your Health Care Reform Ideas

by Terri Potratz | December 8, 2008 at 12:39 pm
267 views | 0 Recommendations | 4 comments

Barack Obama is encouraging Americans to participate in community health care discussions between December 15-31 so that he can incorporate the requests of the people into reformed health care legislation.

"In order for us to reform our health care system, we must first begin reforming how government communicates with the American people," Obama said in a statement yesterday. "These Health Care Community Discussions are a great way for the American people to have a direct say in our health reform efforts."

By applying the high-tech tools and grass-roots activism that helped him win the White House, Obama hopes to circumvent many of the traditionally powerful special interests that have quashed previous health-care reform efforts.


Thomas Daschle, Obama's secretary of health and human services, will personally attend at least one session, and incorporate popular suggestions, requests and concerns into a report and video which will be presented to the president.  These brainstorming sessions will encourage dialogue at a community level, and get Americans talking about what health care changes will have a meaningful and realistic impact on their day to day lives. 

Noting that Obama made health-care reform a top priority during the campaign, Daschle said the early activity was proof that had not changed: "He did it in the campaign, and I am here to tell you that his commitment to changing the health-care system remains strong and focused."

Americans can also get involved through Obama's transition website, which is collecting and tracking online input on health-care reform.  

Community health care discussions can take place anywhere (home, community centre, bake-off, etc) and be informal gatherings or town-hall events, but you need to register your event through the transition website.  Hosts will receive a moderator kit to guide the discussion.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
Tom Leas

I think the U.S. should take an approach to healthcare reform that lies somewhere between the current free market system and that of a nationalized plan, such as British healthcare.  Take the strong points from each program and create a hybrid version.  Allow all Americans to be covered under a nationalized plan for basic and preventative healthcare needs.  Do not penalize those on the nationalized plan that are fortunate enough to carry private insurance.  Allow that insurance to compliment nationalized healthcare, utilizing it to expedite certain services or cover drugs and procedures that may not yet be approved under the nationalized plan.  The British plan fails to accomplish this, often forcing consumers to choose between receiving nationalized coverage or declining that coverage in order to receive “cutting edge” life-saving treatments for certain cancers and critical care procedures.  As a result, these individuals “caught in the middle” have to mortgage their homes and lose any hope of a financially secure future just to receive necessary treatments which the bureaucratic nationalized system has yet to approve.  Bureaucracy kills in cases such as this.  Although many are citing the inability of the government to fund such a program, the overall savings and decline in healthcare costs will come, as all Americans would now be able to take preventative measures when addressing health, as opposed to waiting for a medical crisis to arise.  What about the economic boost to the U.S. economy when healthcare becomes accessible to everyone?  Although margins may be smaller, the sheer volume of services rendered would allow organizations to not only survive, but thrive in this environment.  A balance would exist, as private insurance would be alive and well, and serve as a compliment to a fixed profit national healthcare system.  The free market portion of the plan will provide the funding necessary for continued research and development, while the nationalized portion will provide the profits necessary for continued operations.

0
Tom Leas

I think the U.S. should take an approach to healthcare reform that lies somewhere between the current free market system and that of a nationalized plan, such as British healthcare.  Take the strong points from each program and create a hybrid version.  Allow all Americans to be covered under a nationalized plan for basic and preventative healthcare needs.  Do not penalize those on the nationalized plan that are fortunate enough to carry private insurance.  Allow that insurance to compliment nationalized healthcare, utilizing it to expedite certain services or cover drugs and procedures that may not yet be approved under the nationalized plan.  The British plan fails to accomplish this, often forcing consumers to choose between receiving nationalized coverage or declining that coverage in order to receive “cutting edge” life-saving treatments for certain cancers and critical care procedures.  As a result, these individuals “caught in the middle” have to mortgage their homes and lose any hope of a financially secure future just to receive necessary treatments which the bureaucratic nationalized system has yet to approve.  Bureaucracy kills in cases such as this.  Although many are citing the inability of the government to fund such a program, the overall savings and decline in healthcare costs will come, as all Americans would now be able to take preventative measures when addressing health, as opposed to waiting for a medical crisis to arise.  What about the economic boost to the U.S. economy when healthcare becomes accessible to everyone?  Although margins may be smaller, the sheer volume of services rendered would allow organizations to not only survive, but thrive in this environment.  A balance would exist, as private insurance would be alive and well, and serve as a compliment to a fixed profit national healthcare system.  The free market portion of the plan will provide the funding necessary for continued research and development, while the nationalized portion will provide the profits necessary for continued operations.

0
Jack Scott

 In our endeavor to overhaul our nations Health Care systems, we should consider gett.ing rid of the "NO BID CONTRACTS' in our Medicare Prescription Drug programs, and have one similar to the Veterans Administrations, the Military and Government Employees. This alone would save millions of dollars for our treasury, and help alleviate cost of drugs for our Seniors who use Medicare part "D" prescription  Drugs.

0
Jeffrey R Winter

Health care savings could be realized by not allowing the direct consumer advertising for  Pharma. The only developed countries were DTC advertising  is allowed  is the U.S. & New Zealand. The more that big pharma developes the drug market thru advertising the more stress on our health care system.  Consider the  increased amount of goverment dollars spent on pharmacutcals since DTC advertising began. The loss of Pharma advertisng revenue will be replaced by businesses that do not cost the goverment. This in turn will stimulate bussinesses that need an opportunity to advertise at a competitive rate.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from