Palin Favors Free-Market Healthcare

by foneman30 | August 30, 2008 at 08:05 am
528 views | 13 Recommendations | 17 comments

Videos

Sarah Palin: An Introduction

see larger video

sourced by Milieunet

Sarah Palin: An Introduction

Photos

NEA Reacts to McCain’s Running Mate Choice

NEA Reacts to McCain’s Running Mate Choice

see larger image

uploaded by BMCWrites

In the fall of 2007, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, now Republican candidate for Vice-President of the United States, formed a committee of health care professionals to seek solutions to the controversial Alaskan state Certificate of Need (CON) program.  This program limits competition for health care, in order to protect the availability of emergency room and other critical services currently provided by hospitals.  Two years ago, when running for governor, Palin criticized CON regulations as being an unwarranted interference with business. 

The purpose of the governor’s committee was to reach a consensus on CON reforms.  The committee included top executives of Alaska’s major hospitals, one state official, and leading private physicians from across the state.  The 21-member committee met last fall and released their report in December.  The report concluded the Certificate of Need program should not be repealed; rather, it should be revised.  Ninety percent of the committee members opposed elimination of Certificate of Need.

Ignoring the advice of her committee, the forty-four year old governor announced that she wanted to eliminate CON.  Palin said, “Market mechanisms…” are the best way to ensure that “proper business decision-making guides the development of health care services.”

In January, 2008, on the premise that health care must be market and business driven, Governor Palin introduced the Alaska Health Care Transparency Act, which would repeal CON and ensure the Alaskan health care system is responsive to market conditions.

Members of the committee and legislators said they were surprised at Palin’s decision to dismiss her committee’s advice and introduce a bill to repeal Certificate of Need.

Opponents to the repeal argued that the state should continue to regulate competition with hospitals in small markets.  Hospitals, and other providers around the state, feared the repeal of CON would allow their most profitable services to be lost to new competition.  That loss of revenue could jeopardize emergency room and other critical services.

Palin's legislative allies were unable to get floor votes in either the Alaska House or Senate, this year; and, the governor’s efforts to deregulate health care failed.

"We're very pleased that repeal of CON didn't make it through," said Shawn Morrow, CEO of Bartlett Regional Hospital in Juneau.  "The effect would have been to really weaken the community hospital we have here," he said.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Sputnic

Good stuff . Glad she failed. Hope she loses her money and gets ill

dunkelberg
dunkelberg
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 08:59 on August 30th, 2008

So, if a small community could not support a doctor under the free market scheme, what would have happened to its medical care?

From what I understand, it is not always that easy to go to the next largest town in Alaska  for medical care.

0
foneman30

You hit the nail right on the head, dunkelberg.

Resonant Earth
Resonant Earth
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 09:34 on August 30th, 2008

foneman30, I like this story. It's good stuff. This woman thinks only what MEN TELL HER TO THINK she has NO OPINIONS OF HER OWN, and she seems to shift FREQUENTLY on what she CLAIMS to believe, one minute she supports an idea the next minute she forgets what she thought ten minutes earlier, typical beauty queen or {runner up}

GIVE ME A BREAK!!!!!!

0
foneman30

You'll have to give this much toher, Resonant, she IS a HOTTIE!

0
dunkelberg

I am sure here looks had nothing to do with the decision of adulterer John McCain. 

0
foneman30

I'm not going to throw THAT rock!  Easy-on-the-eyes is an asset in many human endeavours.  The question is, however, does one vote for a candidate based on issues and idealogies, or on sex appeal.  The answer might surprise you.

0
René

That is very close to slander, dunk, if not actually libel.

0
Resonant Earth

Yes she is a HOTTIE, I'll giver her that, and I hope her LOOKS are enough to run the COUNTRY AFTER MACAIN KEELS OVER{sorry but he is not in the best health} AND SHE IS SUDDENLY {LEGALLY BLONDE} here we will have a procession of IDIOTS to have graced the white house, Dan Quayle, George Bush and now a Beauty QUEEN? is the world ending?

0
foneman30

Political campaigns become more shallow with each pasing year.

0
René

Do you need glasses? Legally Blonde?!?

0
bill hicks

One of Obama's wifes duties is to steer uninsured patients away from their emergency room.

0
René

Touché

Milieunet
Milieunet
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 23:39 on August 30th, 2008

foneman30, I like this story. It's good stuff.

phoenixesrose
phoenixesrose
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 01:52 on August 31st, 2008

foneman30, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Just another thing that causes me to worry about 4 more years of Republicans in Power.

0
foneman30

For me, character is more the issue than political party affiliation.

lgal3824
lgal3824
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 15:29 on September 1st, 2008

foneman30, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Just another reason why I will be voting for my Dad as a write in....

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from