Personality Disorders Holocaust
From larger essay "Errors In Psychology" at http://sites.google.com/site/ilyashambatwritings/psychology
With personality psychology we see even worse outcomes. What we see in effect is an effective
holocaust perpetrated against people accused of personality disorders, along with an
institution of de facto totalitarianism against everyone else. Using disorders whose definitions
are very similar to the Nazi definition of Jew, the believers in personality psychology are
waging a de facto holocaust on those accused of these disorders, as well as creating a de facto
totalitarianism for everyone else.
As people have been presented as being criminal by virtue of their personalities, what has in
fact been instituted is the Orwellian concept of crimethink: That one can be made criminal by
virtue of how one thinks. And with that has been put in place a de facto totalitarianism that
aims to control people's minds, people's personalities, and pursuant to that people's lives. Which de facto totalitarianism has then been forced on countries intended to be free, with predictably hypocritical, oppressive and disastrous results.
First the hypocrisy. Every white, part-white, Asian, Hindu or Middle Eastern person living in
United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, and Latin America, is there
because their ancestors were immigrants. Immigrants are people who left their family, their
community, their country, their tradition, and their way of life, to pursue a different way of
life in the New World. According to the believers in personality disorders, that is something
that only a sociopath or a narcissist would do. Which means that all of the aforementioned
populations are descended from people they would describe as possessing narcissistic or
For the people living now, that can affectuate in only two possible outcomes. Either they have
kept true to ways of their ancestors - meaning, to ways of supposed narcissists and sociopaths -
and are now living according to narcissistic or sociopathic adaptations - or they have broken
with the ways of their ancestors, in which case they are supposedly narcissists or sociopaths
themselves. Either way, this means that every white, part-white, Asian, Hindu or Middle Eastern
person living in United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, and Latin America, is supposedly a sociopath or a narcissist. And if the black people on the territory of these countries (except South Africa) think that they are exempt from it, they should think again.
Either they are African immigrants or descendants of African immigrants - in which case they are
supposedly sociopaths or narcissists by the same mechanism as the preceding - or they are
descended from slaves who at one point refused to be slaves any more and who are therefore
supposedly sociopathic or narcissistic as well.
According to definitions of sociopathic and narcissistic character, as same can be portrayed also
all the people to whom the contemporary world owes what it has. Who but a supposed sociopath or a narcissist would have the chutzpah and the temerity to break with the ways of the time to create such things as representative democracy, as was created by American founders at the time when monarchy was the supposedly divinely ordained order, and as has since then become the order of the First World and much of the rest of the world? Who but a supposed sociopath or a narcissist would have the gall to build railroads and skyscrapers and computers, to work to cure diseases, to conceive of any new idea or a theory or invention to which the world owes what it has? Who but a supposed sociopath or a narcissist would break with the ways of the time to do such things as create free markets, abolish slavery, start large-scale industry or charity or religious or social organization, push for women's or workers' rights, confront institutional corruption, develop the underdeveloped parts of the world, or confront such wrongs as sex trafficking and drafting of children into wars? And finally, most relevant for the people in psychology, who but a supposed sociopath or a narcissist would think up of something such as psychology as did its founders and doggedly put it forth despite the fact that it was in complete contradiction with ways and beliefs of the time and were scandalous to those ways and beliefs?
To the people whom the believers in personality psychology describe as sociopathic or
narcissistic, is owed every significant improvement in history, whether it be political,
scientific, social or economic. To such is owed the science of psychology itself and their own
place - both as psychological practicioners and as residents of the New World. And the believers in personality disorders, in pathologizing risk-taking, passion, freedom of thought, personal freedom, romantic passion, innovative thinking, and willingness to take strong stands whether or not they be the popular stances in the time and the place, are denying the benefits of the same to the countries in which they operate and condemn these countries to floundering shorn of what made them great - or even possible - in the first place.
It should not be seen as coincidental that American academia significantly lost the amount of
Nobel Prizes won by American scientists once these beliefs became widespread in academia. Nor should it be seen as coincidental that these beliefs have lead to a war against liberty and an effective totalitarianism taking place in ever greater sections of the free world. As more and more people and groups are demonized, pathologized and destroyed, the noose tightens more
around the necks of all others and makes liberty harder and harder to come by. This results in a
profound de facto totalitarianism that would not tolerate difference from itself even within the
privacy of people's minds. Not even the Communists have been able to come up with a more
insidious and more profound way to rob people of freedom, nor with a more hypocritical ideology, nor with a more complete usurpation of people's lives.
The belief in personality psychology is not only war against life and liberty; they are also a vast drain on competitiveness. Any mind that produces innovation is a mind that is original. An
original mind will be seen as pathological or even as evil by those who equate health and
goodness with the ways and beliefs of the time and the place. As the minds that are capable of
innovation and creativity are attacked, thus lessens the country's ingenuity and intellectual
quickness. This results in the nation losing competitiveness. Ingenuity will not abandon
humanity, but it might very well abandon the countries that practice such ideologies, leading to
these nations falling behind as the rest of the world, immune from such errors, surges ahead.
For an ideology such as this to exist in nations bound by their constitutional principles to
protect and affirm freedom, is an act of violation of constitutional principles and thus in
itself an act of narcissism and sociopathy. A violation not only in face of constitution, but
also of liberty and of national good. The practicioners of such beliefs must be seen as such:
sociopaths and narcissists by their own logic - and perpetrators of holocaust and de facto
totalitarianism in the free world by the logic of history. They, not the people whom they attack,
are the true threat to the well-being of the nations in which they practice their beliefs.