NP Rank:
Philadelphia Passes Tough New Labeling Requirements for Chain Restaurant Menus, Rejects LEAN Act Leniency
Beginning January 1, 2010, chain restaurants in Philadelphia will have to disclose calorie counts on menu boards, and calories, saturated and trans fat, sodium and carbohydrates on printed menus. Chain restaurants include convenience stores, delis, bakeries, cookie counters, ice cream shops and coffee shops that have 15 or more establishments doing business under the same trade name.
Philadelphia joins New York City, Portland, Seattle, Westchester County, NY and the state of California in mandating some form of chain restaurants disclosures.
Download the resolution here [PDF].
The Philadelphia resolution is unique in efforts to include more than just fast food outlets and traditional chain restaurants, and in its applicability to delivered food. Chain restaurants making deliveries to homes and offices in Philadelphia will have to provide nutritional information as though the food was purchased in the restaurant.
With similar laws pending in Rockland County, NY, Nashville, TN and other municipalities, there is a growing national movement toward mandated menu disclosure.
Not one single municipality has adopted legislation similar to the LEAN Act, a restaurant-industry written, watered-down version of the law currently pending in Congress. The LEAN Act’s intent is to render local laws null and void, and to permit calorie disclosures in locations where restaurant patrons are unlikely to see them. The LEAN Act is bad law intended to derail consumer protection entities from putting meaningful nutritional information in front of consumers, and to deprive consumers of real and informed choice in their purchase of calorie-laden fast and/or processed foods. Its goals are restaurant profits at the expense of public health.
Sponsor of the LEAN Act, Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) received $10,000 from the National Restaurant Association PAC to assist with her 2004 Senatorial Election Campaign. According to government records, Murkowski has also received $7,000 from the International Franchise Association, and $1,000 from the National Retail Federation (a division of which is the National Council of Chain Restaurants).
The sponsor of the LEAN Act’s sister Resolution in the House, HR 7187, is Representative Jim Matheson (D-UT). Matheson received $10,000 from the National Restaurant Association PAC to assist with his 2006 House Election Campaign. According to government records, Matheson has also received $3,000 from the International Franchise Association and $2,000 from the National Retail Federation.
The other Senate sponsor of the LEAN Act, Tom Carper (D-DE) has also received money from the National Retail Federation between 2002 and 2006.



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 16:21 on March 17th, 2009
What exactly are restaurants (and the NRA) hiding from?
Nutrition analyses on menu items is inexpensive, despite what the NRA and other opponents of nutrition labeling are reporting. I read one report recently that said a menu analysis would cost as much as $5,000. Saying that is like saying that a car could cost as much as $1 million. It's very misleading. The truth is that you can get nutrition analyses for $37.49 at www.eatricious.com/restaurants.
In addition, I would argue that if restaurants had some healthy options on the menu and did a decent job of promoting them, they would attract more clients. There is a growing population of people who actually care about what they eat. (that's surprising!?)
From the chef's perspective it makes sense to have healthy options too. If you take away bad ingredients you save money. Good chefs can keep things simple, healthy and tasteful at the same time. I submit that if a chef spent an hour adapting or creating a half of a dozen recipes for the menu people would love it. I know I would AND I would refer people. It's a no brainer to me.
at 12:57 on June 22nd, 2009
It's great that Congress is taking steps toward transparent information in chain restaurants. Education through transparency is not so much to ask for, nor does it detract from someone's dining experience. I'm curious to see -- if the bill gets passed through the referral committees, that is -- how effective the MEAL act would be once put into place.
In the meantime, I suggest people check out Corporate Accountability International's campaign to improve our nation's diet and food production and consumption.