is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
While consumers are increasing demand for pork produced without antibiotics, more of the pigs raised in such conditions carry bacteria and parasites associated with food-borne illnesses, according to a new study. A comparison of swine raised in antibiotic-free and conventional pork production settings revealed that pigs raised outdoors without antibiotics had higher rates of three food-borne pathogens than did pigs on conventional farms, which remain indoors and receive preventive doses of antimicrobial drugs.
"Animal-friendly, outdoor farms tend to have a higher occurrence of Salmonella, as well as higher rates of parasitic disease," said lead study author Wondwossen Gebreyes, associate professor of veterinary preventive medicine at Ohio State University.
More than half of the pigs on antibiotic-free farms tested positive for Salmonella, compared to 39 percent of conventionally raised pigs infected with the bacterial pathogen. The presence of the Toxoplasma gondii parasite was detected in 6.8 percent of antibiotic-free pigs, compared to 1.1 percent of conventionally raised pigs. And two naturally raised pigs of the total 616 sampled tested positive for Trichinella spiralis, a parasite considered virtually eradicated from conventional U.S. pork operations.
On conventional farms, pigs remain indoors in ventilated barns and have free movement within pens. Antibiotics are added to their feed to promote growth and protect against infections, followed by a withdrawal period before slaughter to ensure the meat doesn't contain any antibiotic residue.
On antibiotic-free farms, pigs are reared in open fields with free access to soil and water. They are given antibiotics only for treatment against active infections, and once sick pigs are treated, they are separated from the herds and no longer marketed as naturally raised pork.
The scientists tested pigs on farms in North Carolina, Ohio and Wisconsin. Of the total studied, 324 were raised in antibiotic-free systems and 292 lived on conventional farms. The researchers took blood samples to test for the presence of antibodies against bacterial and parasitic infections. The higher rates of infection on natural farms were consistent in all three geographic regions.
The researchers theorized that naturally raised pigs' exposure to moisture, vegetation and other animal species could contribute to their higher rates of pathogens. This study is part of a comprehensive examination of food safety issues related to pork production that includes testing pigs for a broader range of disease-causing organisms.
JamieShonkyCameraBiscuit
Gamston, NTT,
Moon Pappy
Lititz, Pennsylvania, United States
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
at 15:59 on June 11th, 2008
rpshen, I like this story. It's good stuff.
With summer and BBQ season, gotta make sure we cook those pork properly
at 11:47 on June 13th, 2008
OMG!!! ..."this animal- friendly, outdoor farms tends to have occurrence of Salmonella, as well as higher rates of parasetic deseases?" ...it's very interesting!!! ...thanks rpshen' for sharing...
at 12:37 on June 14th, 2008
Dr. Glen Shepard, also wrote the following "About the Dangers of Eating Pork" in the 31st May, 1952 issue of the Wanshington Post/Washington, USA. "After reading the statement of Dr. Shepard, we can presume that there is no real guarantee of safety, even when eating pork which is not affected by 'Trichina Worms'. To take pork then, is a gamble with one's health and life is at stake." Thanks' again!!!