Pregnant Women, Kids Now Urged to Eat Mercury-Laced Seafood

by Terri Potratz | December 16, 2008 at 11:09 am
642 views | 19 Recommendations | 9 comments

Photos

did the tuna survive?

did the tuna survive?

see larger image

uploaded by Shockingly Tasty

The FDA has released a draft report outlining their position on the safety of mercury-laced seafood for pregnant women and children, saying that the benefits of seafood far outweigh any health risks and that people should eat more fish. 

The pros and cons of eating seafood have been debated over the past couple of years but this report, which is still being mulled over internally by the FDA before they will comment on it publicly, may spur the US government to change their recommendation levels for children and pregnant women.

If approved by the White House, the FDA's position would reverse the government's current policy that certain groups -- women of childbearing years, pregnant women, nursing mothers, infants and children -- can be harmed by the mercury in fish and should limit their consumption.

The FDA's recommendations have alarmed scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency, who in internal memos criticized them as "scientifically flawed and inadequate" and said they fell short of the "scientific rigor routinely demonstrated by EPA."

The FDA sent its draft report, a copy of which was obtained by The Washington Post, to the White House Office of Management and Budget as part of the FDA's effort to update the existing health advisory. The report argued that nutrients in fish, including omega-3 fatty acids, selenium and other minerals could boost a child's IQ by three points.


Videos

Mercury in Fish Solution - Safe Harbor - KING 5_wmv

see larger video

sourced by Barbara McPherson

Mercury in Fish Solution - Safe Harbor - KING 5_wmv

Pregnant women are currently advised to consume no more than 12 ounces of fish a week, but the FDA is now stating that this is the minimum amount of fish needed per week in order to reap optimal health benefits.  The FDA and EPA both have major roles in public health and safety when it comes to mercury -

In 2004, the two agencies issued their first joint advisory, suggesting that women of childbearing age, pregnant women, nursing mothers, infants and children stop eating four species of fish considered especially high in mercury: swordfish, shark, tilefish and king mackerel. At the same time, the government advised limiting consumption of other mercury-contaminated fish.


The US government has advised against pregnant women and children eating seafood since 2001, but scientists and private groups have been advocating a reversal for the last few years.  In 2007 a coalition hoped to change the government's standpoint on the issue:

The new advisory comes from the National Healthy Mothers, Healthy Babies Coalition, a nonprofit group with nearly 150 members, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the March of Dimes, the National Institute on Child Health and Human Development and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Concerns over the impact of fish on the brain development of fetuses and infants, the most vulnerable groups, have been one of the more vexing nutritional dilemmas of recent years, causing widespread consumer confusion and fueling much scientific debate.


Health Canada has been a bit more lax in recent years, noting that most fish are safe to eat but that pregnant women and children should try to avoid aggressive consumption of some kinds of fish:

Most fish contain some of the long chain omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Recent evidence has suggested that fish consumption and the associated intake of EPA and DHA from fish can help maintain healthy heart function. Consumption of fish has also been associated with reduced risk of sudden cardiac death in healthy people and there is evidence that regular consumption of fish by pregnant women and women who may become pregnant plays a role in normal fetal brain and eye development.

Some types of fish have higher levels of these beneficial fatty acids than others. Fish and shellfish that contain higher levels of these fatty acids and are also low in mercury include: anchovy, capelin, char, hake, herring, Atlantic mackerel, mullet, pollock ( Boston bluefish), salmon, smelt, rainbow trout, lake whitefish, blue crab, shrimp, clam, mussel and oyster.

All fish are also a significant source of vitamin D and contribute valuable mineral nutrients to the diet such as selenium, iodine, magnesium, iron and copper.

Types of fish that should be eaten less often

Health Canada has identified certain fish as being of more concern when it comes to mercury in fish. Fish can accumulate mercury in their muscles through absorption from the surrounding water but mostly from the prey that they eat. This mercury can also concentrate up the food chain. Therefore, predatory fish that eat lots of other fish for food tend to contain higher levels of mercury.

These include fresh/frozen tuna, shark, swordfish, marlin, orange roughy and escolar.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Paschen

This is no longer under control. The Roman died due to lead poisoning some 2000 years ago and we will due Mercury, how wonderful it is to be civilized.

0
Barbara McPherson

We should also look to where the fish were feeding.  If their range is at the mouth of a very polluted river, you should be much more cautious about consumption.  There is no such thing as a good dose of mercury.

0
patgarcia

It's hard to think what our diet should be based on. I try to eat fresh fish more than twice a week

0
lefty_liberated

What a bunch of jerks they are. You know additionally we've apparently fished 90% of the ocean. So in a way people should stop eating fish all together. I personally have been a vegetarian for like 15 years now. 

Nice diversity of sources in your article and very important public safety announcment. This article encourages people to think critically of the information they're being presented. 

0
Art_By_Alida

I called the FDA to see how true this is.

They told me this, "The FDA has not changed their recommendation of fish consumption. Someone from the EPA probably leaked something and that is what's causing the news. The FDA is NOT going to change their recommendation of fish consumption as it stands."

I went to the FDA website and no new recommendations are there.

This is getting out of control.

To begin with, even if there was a "draft" for a new recommendation, the White House would have to approve it.

Stop the misinformation before  it takes on a life of it's own.

0
Art_By_Alida

And also...I asked a friend from India one time, "Why don't people who are hungry in India eat fish?"

His reponse to me was this, "If Hindus ate fish, the oceans would have been fished out long ago."

You don't HAVE to eat fish, period.

It's all marketing by fishing lobbies...and also probably who is trying to get the government to say people should eat more fish.


1
Art_By_Alida

If you read the Washington Post article, from which this is taken you will know the FDA has NOT done this.

Something from the EPA was leaked to the Post....

For the FDA to change their recommendation, it would first have to be approved by the White House...and the Post DID say that...

This headline is inaccurate.

Hey, right now I am very upset with the FDA on many issues, but this is just inaccurate.....

0
Terri Potratz

Art_By_Alida, thanks for your comments.  The headline is not misleading - many other groups urge pregnant women to eat seafood, and the headline represents an overall shift in opinion rather than the FDA's stance in particular.

As noted by the FDA themselves, they will not comment publicly to draft reports so I am not surprised they wouldn't divulge any information to you regarding this particular report when you rang them up. 

The EPA did 'obtain' a copy somehow, and it would have to be approved by the White House before anything became official - you're right.  Both points were also outlined in the above article.

1
Art_By_Alida

Hi.

Here is the group who leaked the info. This is their email to me below..no one is recommending that women and children eat more fish...

The FDA has not issued a change....some at the agency may have been pressured by the fish industry lobbyists, but no recommendations were given out. The White House has to approve any changes...and maybe Bush was planning on doing that before he left office, but it failed.

EWG exposes FDA plan to push mercury-laced seafoodcanned_tuna_mercury

On Friday, December 12, the Environmental Working Group made public internal government documents disclosing the Food and Drug Administration's secret plans to reverse federal warnings that pregnant women and children limit their fish intake to avoid mercury, a neurotoxin especially dangerous to the fetus and infants. EWG obtained both the FDA plan, stamped "CLOSE HOLD," and memos by senior Environmental Protection Agency scientists attacking FDA's rationale. The Washington Post broke the story, and other national stories followed. 

Reaction from Capitol Hill was swift and sharp. Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-VT., denounced the FDA: "Now, in the administration's 11th hour, they are quietly trying to water down advisories for women and children about the dangers of mercury in fish, disregarding sound science on this issue. Mercury is a potent neurotoxin capable of impairing childhood development at very low levels." 


This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Blue Crush
First Flagged at 1:16 PM, Dec 16, 2008 by Blue Crush
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (19)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from