Real reasons for domestic violence

by ishambat | January 10, 2011 at 03:47 am
529 views | 0 Recommendations | 3 comments

To effectively fight domestic violence one must know the causes of domestic violence. And the first step toward knowing that is knowing what they are not.

It is not love, beauty, romance or sexuality. The sexless Puritans are highly violent toward their wives; the unattractive women are just as subject to violence as the attractive ones; and in cultures, such as India and Middle East, that have forbidden romantic love and where marriages are arranged, the violence is worse.

It is not low self-esteem. There are plenty of self-confident football types who are brutal toward their wives and plenty of shy guys who aren't.

It is not personality disorders. Not only are there many cultures in the world where violence against wives is the social norm, but there are in fact cultures in the world that think there's something wrong with the man if he is not violent toward his wife.

It is not thinking oneself a victim. There are plenty of take-charge business and military types who are severely violent toward their wives.

So what are the causes of domestic violence? The best way to ascertain that is to look at cultures in which it is the norm and compare them to cultures in which it isn't. And again and again, the answer is this: The beliefs that encourage domestic violence.

Beliefs such as:

That women are evil; 
That man must be head of the family; 
That masculinity means controlling the woman; 
That women are "sluts," "bitches" or "whores"; 
That women are exploiters of men; 
That women are responsible for the world's suffering; 
That women should be second-class citizens and put up and shut up.

Unlike what many in psychology believe, the way one treats the other person is based, not on what one thinks about oneself, but of what one thinks about the other person. So if one has good self-esteem and thinks well about oneself but thinks badly about the other person, then one would not be good to the other person, and no amount of raising one's own self-esteem will alter that. Men's treatment of women is a result, not of what they believe about themselves, but of what they believe about women - either about women in general, or about the particular woman with which they share their lives.

Furthermore, unlike what many in psychology believe, it is people's conscious convictions that determine a vast chunk of their decisions. Looking historically we see the vast extent to which people's conscious convictions charted the course of history. And now, as ugly misogynistic beliefs have become more and more prevalent, surprise surprise - we are seeing a vast rise in violence against women, even though we have not seen noticeable changes in men's self-esteem or in the number of people with personality disorders.

And it is only by addressing and changing these ugly beliefs that actually do cause domestic violence, instead of wasting everyone's time on things that don't, that it will finally become possible to do something effective about domestic violence.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
matt stefanovich

I read superfically your article. well this is such complex psychological, social and of course political question, that 3 days of conference with many lectures would not solve it. Domestic violence will always exist, as long as there is violence in general terms. Lets take the foundations of modern West- Cromwell, Robespierre, George Washington- they all used violence against their foes. I did not mention Russia, its another story. USA originated as a society which was established with a few exceptions by educated freemasons. This has formed the soul of the society. Its antiaristocratic, against class privileges and agression against ancien regime. The right to bear arms {or firearms :)|  is very important for ordinary Americans. Congresswoman Gabie Gifford as I heard, fought for right to bear arms. Yet violence and agression atacked her. The lunatic who was shooter is unimportant. But back to domestic violence- sometimes its hard to remain calm, sometimes it is normal to raise voice or to even say a threat.  Ilia, what is important are the stereotypes. Some women, even in central Europe, they want a man who talks down to them. it is strange, but it is so. :)

0
matt stefanovich

errata= I meant- it beared aggression against ancien regime meaning british rule.

0
ishambat

Matt, I know that it takes a lot to solve domestic violence. One possible solution for men is to control themselves and not tolerate violence by other men against women. 

There are women who expect and even want men to talk down to them. That exists even in America. They tend to wind up with men who do just that, and for demand of which there is no shortage of supply.

Regarding guns, it's all about who gets the gun. Guns are not allowed in DC, but there are plenty of people who have them, and most of them are gangsters. So there are things to be said for guns being legal (meaning, that guns don't go only to gangsters but also to law-abiding people who can use them to defend themselves from gangsters). However among the gun movement in US most are ridiculous. They really believe that guns will protect them from American government, which has at its disposal the most powerful military in the world. For this reason idiots are over-represented in this constituency, and that's not for anyone's benefit.

There are definitely men who know how to fight and don't practice domestic violence. Workable solutions would be less about doing away with violence - doing which puts one at a disadvantage against more violent cultures - and more about controlling it and knowing when and where not to use it.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from