Sex ed in high school lowers pregnancies: study

by Rob Peters | April 1, 2008 at 10:07 am
887 views | 5 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

contraceptive pills

contraceptive pills

see larger image

uploaded by Anqa

The US government widely promotes the abstinence-only approach, but new evidence shows that might not be the wisest plan.

NEW YORK - Comprehensive sex education that includes discussion of birth control may help reduce teen pregnancies, while abstinence-only programs seem to fall short, the results of a U.S. survey suggest.

Using data from a 2002 national survey, researchers found that among more than 1,700 unmarried, heterosexual teens between 15 and 19 years old, those who'd received comprehensive sex ed in school were 60 percent less likely to have been pregnant or gotten someone pregnant than teens who'd had no formal sex education.

Meanwhile, there was no clear benefit from abstinence-only education in preventing pregnancy or delaying sexual intercourse, the researchers report in the Journal of Adolescent Health.

"The bottom line is that there is strong evidence that comprehensive sex education is more effective than abstinence-only education at preventing teen pregnancies," said lead researcher Pamela K. Kohler, of the Center for AIDS and STD at the University of Washington in Seattle.

She told Reuters Health the study "also solidly debunks the myth that teens who learn about birth control are more likely to have sex."

Currently, the federal government champions the abstinence-only approach, giving around $170 million each year to states and community groups to teach kids to say no to sex. This funding precludes mention of birth control and condoms, unless it is to emphasize their failure rates.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 10:50 on April 1st, 2008

Hi Rob - Thanks for bringing this story to us!

Not only is the Abstinence-only approach failing to reduce teen pregnancies, according to the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS), Abstinence-only is now a proven failure.  Abstinence-only programs "... delivers misinformation and biased messages, violates basic rights, discriminate against gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals, are based on fear and and shame, and are in fact harmful to young people." 

SIECUS is working to advance policies that: "...require medical accuracy in sexual health education programs, support comprehensive approach to sexuality education, protect every woman's right to choose, and support equal legal status for same-sex couples as for different-sex married couples." (cf. siecus.org).

This alone said, it is further apparent that progressive sex education is needed in our schools. 

Thanks again for bringing this story to us!

 

 

 

0
documax

Youngsters are more sophisticated than ever. Moreover, the contradiction that affects adults confuses young people. On the one hand, adults promulgate the idea of restraint in sexuality and expression; while on the other the Government publishes the Starr report on the Internet. Also, the public service announcement approach, whether it be towards drugs or to sex - ONLY ever discusses the dark dangers, while leaving out anything about the pleasurable aspects of drugs and physical relations. Young people, who are already perplexed by such duplicity, and who are in stages of identity formation and rebellion (as a function of their development) - feel as if they are being taken for a ride (please excuse the pun). At the very least, they're left without all the information needed in order to make the type of mature and measured responses that their parents and society asks of them. And indeed wants for them, in service of a well-meaning, nurturing, and caring attitude. We all need to wake up and smell the coffee, and let novel approaches satisfy what has been the abject failure of accepted orthodxy. In fact, that has been implicitly set to protect our sensibilities, and not to protect our children.

documax has contributed a photo to this story.

0
prochoiceprofaith

Photo courtesy of Emily Goodstein, Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice

prochoiceprofaith has contributed a photo to this story.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Rhonda J Mangus
First Flagged at 10:50 AM, Apr 1, 2008 by Rhonda J Mangus
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Health

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from