Sex goes way beyond male or female

by Sioen | September 11, 2009 at 03:52 am
1802 views | 37 Recommendations | 6 comments

Photos

Male and female don't cover all the options

Male and female don't cover all the options

see larger image

uploaded by Sioen

Many folks think humans come in two sexual flavors -- male and female -- and that's about the end of the story. Pull down their pants and you can know what sex they are.

The truth, as with almost everything about humans, is a lot more complex. We've seen this recently, as 18-year-old South African runner Castor Semenya was required to take a set of gender tests in August after her rapid rise in world standings.

Human sexual traits aren't one-or-the-other, though. They're more like a spectrum. Many people have well-developed genitals (penis or clitoris, vagina and breasts) and matching well-developed reproductive organs (testes or ovaries and uterus). Even within this group, as we know, some people's genitals are bigger or smaller, some more or less sensitive, and there are other variations.

But some people have less-developed genitals, and some don't have matching reproductive organs. This is why it's a spectrum. Some folks might have well-developed genitals but less-developed reproductive organs. Or the genitals might be the opposite sex of the reproductive organs. People with a vagina and breasts might not have ovaries -- or they might have testes inside, instead.

A whole host of different medical variations are the cause. Some people's bodies don't use testosterone or estrogen the same way as other people, leading to this diversity of sexual traits. Some of these medical variations can have serious effects, and medical intervention is suggested in some cases.

More often, though, people are told the options -- in many cases, the parents are told right after birth -- and allowed to decide. When genitals are significantly less-developed or formed quite differently, doctors often recommend parents have surgery to make them more "normal." These surgeries have become more controversial in recent years, as a growing number of people think of their sex at birth as natural, even if it's a minority. Some activists say we ought to broaden our understanding of human sexuality, rather than be trapped by the false "either-or" standard. Other people worry about a social stigma, and look to surgery as an answer.

So what are the numbers? How "normal" or not is sexual ambiguity? According to the Intersex Society of North America, 1-in-100 live births have some sexual ambiguity. Some of these are very mild and might not gain the attention of doctors until later in life. The number of live births where sexual ambiguity is so severe that doctors call in a sex-differentiation specialist is often said to be 1-in-1,500.

Either way, many people all around you are not just "either-or." They might be complicated, but all humans are.

For the International Association of Athletics Federation, the governing body that asked Semenya to take the gender tests, the question becomes, "What is a woman?" The IAAF's own rules don't mention requirements to compete as one sex or the other, and its policy document on gender verification says there is no test required to compete, and contains no definition of what a "female" competitor is. Instead, if someone's sex is questioned, the IAAF rules focus on whether the different sexual traits would give an athlete an advantage over other female athletes.

Early media reports (as reported here on NowPublic) have said Semenya has no ovaries or uterus and has internal testes. One report mentioned that the IAAF will recommend medical treatment to her because she is at risk. I assume she has female genitalia, or it seems unlikely that her family and doctors would keep insisting she's a woman. All of these factors might suggest she has androgen insensitivity syndrome or gonadal dysgenesis.

Both of these medical variations often occur when a person has XY chromosomes -- usually considered a "male" -- but both are allowed under the IAAF policy as "conditions that accord no advantage over other females." The BBC has reported that it is not expected Semenya will be stripped of the gold medal she won in August.

It will be interesting to see what the IAAF decides at its November meeting. Despite the early press reports, the IAAF released the following statement on Semenya on Sep. 11:

Monte-Carlo - The IAAF has noted statements in recent media articles regarding the athlete Caster Semenya of South Africa.

We would like to emphasise that these should not be considered as official statements by the IAAF.

We can officially confirm that gender verification test results will be examined by a group of medical experts. NO decision on the case will be communicated until the IAAF has had the opportunity to complete this examination. We do not expect to make a final decision on this case before the next meeting of the IAAF Council which takes place in Monaco on November 20-21.

Please note that there will be no further comments from the IAAF on Caster Semenya until that time.

No matter how the Semenya case turns out, there will always be lots of people who don't fit neatly into either the "male" or "female" category. The more information we have, the better we will be able to deal with this sexual variation all around us. And more information is crucial for people with sexual ambiguities, so they can make the health care decisions that help them to become happy individuals.

For further reading, visit:
Organisation Internationale des Intersexues (advocacy group)
Accord Alliance (health care support)
Intersex Society of North America (archive site)
Intersex, breaking the taboo (Channel 4)
Intersexuality (Wikipedia)

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Sioen

I tend to agree with you; depending on the body's ability to use the hormones, excessive levels of testosterone would seem to "accord an advantage over other female athletes," to quote the IAAF's rules.

The IAAF rules read to me as rather capricious, though. I think it might be smarter to actually have a specific definition of something -- anything -- that DOES exclude you from the women's category. The policy as written specifically allows conditions -- like AIS or congenital adrenal hyperplasia -- that can result in higher levels of testosterone.

I wonder if the rules they have now might not stop them from disallowing her even if perhaps they should.


0
Bram

I see two seperate issues here:

  1. The gender issue
  2. How the gender issue plays in to competition sports with arbitrary rules

The gender issue really is a non-issue. In just about any case other than reproduction, gender is ultimately irrelevant. Your (lack of certain) sex organs do not decrease or increase your value as a human being. The whole legal thing about genders should just disappear. Anyone who still thinks that men can't be good nurses and women don't belong in management is quite simply a moron. There are various reasons why a certain man would make a lousy nurse, or why a certain woman would mangle management, but attributing these qualities solely to testes and ovaries is obviously short-sighted.So please, remove genders from IDs, birth-certificates, CVs, job applications, toilets and anywhere else. Let's look beyond genders and at people.The competition sports issue, is a bit more of a conundrum. It is impossible to define "fair" rules, when every human being is so different. Some have high levels of hormones, other have too much or too few red blood cells, some are tall, have longer legs, webbed toes, small breasts and a myriad of other (dis)advantages. The ones who reach the top, are by definition the ones with the "unfair" advantage over the rest vast majority of the population. Organising fair competitions for these superhuman beings is nigh impossible. When the difference between individual athletes' best times (or heights, or whatever) is as small as it is today, then it's all too easy to get lost staring at details that were irrelevant just decades ago. But face it, there can be no "fair". The top will always be dominated by the strongest and fasted and those with the bodies best equiped for their sport. There's nothing wrong with the fact that the majority of these will always have a penis and testes. After all, all of these sports are exactly what the male body has evolved for! Hundreds of thousands of years of evolution have made it possible for Bolt to be this fast. If you want "fair" competitions in which women can dominate, then you should come up with some sort of entertaining sport that caters to women's strong points. It's a shame that so many people are so hung up on sports. Bread and circuses, I guess...

0
Sioen

Good point; I quite agree.

Unless sports authorities establish a baseline of what's "normal" for their female competitors, how  is anyone to judge when a certain athlete is "unfairly" better than normal?

What about women whose legs are significantly longer and more muscled than "normal"? Isn't that ALL female runners? And plenty of women who have all the usual female parts have higher levels of testosterone than other women -- is that "unfair"?

It seems strange to ask women to be have a body that's physically exceptional and then worry that some athletes are too exceptional.

1
Lelo

It he is a transvestite than I can understand not letting him run in a girls event but if it is a girl with also male organs than they should let her run in the event with no questions asked.

0
Steve-007

makes sense to me.. strange to even have this conversation really!

0
Michael james

I think IAAF were not sleeping when she was presented on the list among the runners. After she might have won the medal,the begin to go for gender test,i think this is racism.  

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Rhonda J Mangus
First Flagged at 4:49 AM, Sep 11, 2009 by Rhonda J Mangus
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (37)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from