Silver Dental Fillings May Leak Mercury, FDA Warns

by Jarrett Martineau | June 12, 2008 at 11:36 am
2474 views | 11 Recommendations | 6 comments

Photos

The U.S. FDA is warning that silver dental fillings could release a tiny amount of "mercury vapour" caused by chewing and brushing which "may have neurotoxic effects on the nervous systems of developing children and fetuses". Those with existing silver fillings are not currently being advised to have them replaced.
Silver dental fillings contain mercury, and the government for the first time is warning that they may pose a safety concern for pregnant women and young children. The Food and Drug Administration posted the precaution on its Web site earlier this month, to settle a lawsuit - making the move a victory for anti-mercury activists.

The warning is not aimed at the general population, only at two groups already urged to limit mercury from another source - seafood - because too much can harm a developing brain.

The fillings, formally known as dental amalgams, "contain mercury, which may have neurotoxic effects on the nervous systems of developing children and fetuses," reads the FDA Web posting.

That doesn't mean it truly harms, and the FDA advises against removing existing fillings.

The agency still is studying whether the small amount of mercury vapor released by chewing and brushing is enough to cause neurologic disorders or other problems in youngsters. There have been only a handful of rigorous studies comparing children given either amalgam fillings or tooth-colored resin composite fillings that are mercury-free - and those studies haven't detected any brain problems.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
2
René

Late! Late! LATE!

0
Jarrett Martineau

This story was first reported by the Associated Press at 03:22 PM EST on June 12, 2008.

0
René

Not you, jarrett, the FDA is Late! Late! LAATE! Heavy metal toxicity, esp by these type of fillings has been known for decades. Chelation was developed to help rid the body of these toxins. And it was found that the fillings continued to contribute unless they were replaced with non-toxic material.

0
Paul_W

It's interesting, too, that the FDA only admits this after being sued over it. It tells me that the FDA is under the thumb of economic and/or political interests, not consumer interests. Anything, ANYTHING in service to the almighty dollar. Even peoples' health.


But, hey, the Feds wouldn't dream of allowing mercury to go into the water supply. They know what it would do to the fishies.

rpshen
rpshen
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 14:10 on June 12th, 2008

Jarrett Martineau, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
PEP

This has been an issue since at least the 1970's. People who raised heck back then about mercury in fillings were called kooks.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

rpshen
First Flagged at 2:10 PM, Jun 12, 2008 by rpshen
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Health

Recommendations (11)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from