Add Your Photos and Video to This Story

Terrifying new disease linked to genetically altered crops

by René | May 1, 2008 at 07:58 pm | 856 views | 27 comments

Do you feel like bugs are crawling under your skin? Are sharp fibers emerging from open sores that won't heal?

It's not a hallucination. It's a terrifying new disease that has been linked to genetically altered food.

Over 10,000 US families have registered with Morgellons.org, the website dealing with this disease, up to 25 percent in Northern California. The disease had been labelled as a hoax or hypochondria, but many suffer without relief and some have died.

There are reports of this disease from over 50 countries. Finally, a year after promising to look into it, the Center for Disease Control has funded a $300,000 research project with Kaiser Permanente to test and interview 150 to 500 patients living in Northern California.

Ahmed Kilani, a specialist in infectious disease detection, claimed to have broken down two fiber samples and extracted their DNA. He found that they belonged to a fungus.

In an even more provocative finding, Vitaly Citovsky, Professor of Biochemistry and Cell Biology at Stony Brook University in New York, discovered that the fibers contained the substance Agrobacterium, a genus of gram-negative bacteria capable of genetically transforming not only plants, but also other eukaryotic species, including human cells. Source: NaturalNews

So far no cure has been found, though some get relief with antibiotics. Many in the health field are beginning to point to genetically modified food. So the fibers are linked to genetical alterations. Who does genetical alterations?

  • Conventionally raised soybeans and make up the largest portion of genetically modified (GM) crops. Ingredients made from these foods include high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), corn flour and meal, corn dextrin, starch, soy sauce, margarine, and tofu.
  • By definition, food that is certified organic must be free from all GM organisms, produced without artificial pesticides and fertilizers and from an animal reared without the routine use of antibiotics, growth promoters or other drugs. Additionally, grass-fed beef will not have been fed GM corn feed.
  • Look at produce stickers. The PLU code on stickers for conventionally grown fruit consists of four numbers, organically grown fruit has five numbers prefaced by the number nine, and GM fruit has five numbers prefaced by the number eight.
  • See article by Dr. Mercola.

    The gigantic biotech corporation Monsanto is threatening to destroy the agricultural biodiversity which has served mankind for thousands of years. Monsanto has merged with a pharmaceutical company to dominate world markets in crops and drugs and chemicals.

    The biggest threat to small farmers in the world, the 'seed police' as Monsanto's investigators are called by farmers and others, threaten lawsuits if farmers dare save seeds to replant, or somehow have crops that have been pollinated by Monsanto seed crops, threatening them with suits of "seed piracy."

    This is the company that brought you saccharin, dioxin, and PCBs, and Agent Orange!

    Now it has targeted milk production. Vanity Fair, May 2008

    How many of you see this label on your milk products: "From Cows Not Treated with rBGH."? Well, Monsanto would like to put an end to that! And has been attempting to do just that.

    René O'Deay

    Add a comment Comments (27)

    amyjudd
    good stuff:

    René, I like this story. It's good stuff. I have not heard of this before. Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Scary stuff.

    René

    Thanks, Amy, I heard about this disease two years ago. People were having this problem in California, and nobody took it seriously. It sounded too much like a drug reaction/hallucination.

    Karen Hatter
    good stuff:

    René, I like this story. It's good stuff. One of the most frightening things about genetically engineered crops is, due to their content, with many engineered to contain pesticides to make them immune to insects and to specific plant diseases, etc., these characteristics allow the engineered plants to overgrow 'average' plant life. Conceivably, depending on how this goes, these plants near the potential to replace many other crops.

    René

    Thanks, Karen, but they don't make them immune, no, no, they make them to go with their own 'Roundup' weed killer, adapted to withstand heavy application of Roundup. I met people back in the 90s who were travelling around the country collecting heirloom seeds to help keep the diversity going. What's really frightening is Monsanto's huge investigative team, who go around spying on growers, collecting evidence, and helping bring these lawsuits against these farmers, co-ops, and even totally innocent people. see the  Vanity Fair story. Many who are sued or are threatened with loss of all they own, cave and settle, cause they do not have the resources to go up against this huge and relentless corporation.

     

    Karen Hatter

    René, that's even scarier than I thought. I'd heard of the strong arm tactics to force farmers to use their crops. Deplorable.

    Mikasi

    Thanks for the words on this. Unless I see it wrong the people who developed these foods have at least given them a weak link that people can rely on. They make the seeds sterile, if I remember rightly. That means one generation then out. At least we have that to be thankful for.

    As a side thought, I wonder what if the people who manufacture this feed it to themselves and their own families?

    René

    Wrong, Mikasi.

    Farmers who buy Monsanto’s patented Roundup Ready seeds are required to sign an agreement promising not to save the seed produced after each harvest for re-planting, or to sell the seed to other farmers. This means that farmers must buy new seed every year. Those increased sales, coupled with ballooning sales of its Roundup weed killer, have been a bonanza for Monsanto.

    And part of the problem is that Monsanto-altered crops often cross-pollinate with neighboring native crops, and the company's investigators will take samples, test the DNA and accuse the neighbors of 'stealing' or 'seed piracy', and sue them. So even farmers who never buy Monsanto's seeds become their victims. But this is a kind of piracy also cuz that process steals the honest crops of farmers who do not wish to use Monsanto's seeds, as well as genetically altering the native seeds. This is not good.

    Some scientists fear that monocrops could eventually fall victim to something, like a bug or bacteria or even a plant virus, causing a real castastrophe: a gigantic crop failure.

    These people are playing god with our food. globally.

     

     

     

     

    Mikasi

    Thanks for the correction. Think I'll put in the movie "The Corporation" now and just wonder what the greedniks will inflict upon us next.

    matte

    Oh the panic merchants are out again, and still hiding behind popularist magazine articles...shame there has been no independant research done for this post.

    They make the seeds sterile, if I remember rightly. That means one generation then out. At least we have that to be thankful for.

    This has always been the case, even for non-gm crops .... it part of plant breeding - NON biotech plant breeding - go read up on it. (essentiall no different to breeds of cows, dogs etc - they will REVERT back given the opporuntiy in just 9 generations)

    Monsanto-altered crops often cross-pollinate with neighboring native crops,

    Only if the neighboring crop is the same species, like canola/canola.  It certainly won't cross polinate with grass, flowers cabbages or carrots - again go read up on basic plant breeding.

    Also go and read up on what GM actually is. In all this scare-mongering post I have not seen one correct use of the terminology.

    GM is merely using biotechnology to skip some steps that are part of any normal plant breeding process (if you don;t like the result of plant breeding give up all wheat, barley, oats, corn products today - they are all genetically modified from their origin stock - this modification STARTED 3,000 years ago - again, go read up on it.

    Roundup ready is one altered gene and the result is called TRANSGENIC, that is something from another species etc. And no, it cannot escape.....

    Like to be healthy and use Soy based products?? Soy milk better for you??  Do you know how much NON genetically modified soybean is grown in the world today?  Less than 20%. Almost all soybean and cornj grown in the USA has been 'doctored'.

    Start cleaning out the pantry folks, soybean and corn is in virtually EVERYTHING

    René

    Of course, Matte, they do cross-pollinate with the same type crops. I didn't mean to imply otherwise. but there is a tendency to grow only one type of corn, etc. and that does make the food supply more vulnerable if some pest develops that decimates it. Biodiversity is a preventative to total loss in that event.

    Personally I'm allergic to corn, so I eat very little of it, and tend to avoid anything with high fructose corn. I do not like soy products, especially tofu. Go ahead and eat it, Matte, if you like.

    And I am offended that you call me a fear-mongerer or a panic merchant. I guess you think it's okay to ingest all the antibiotics, hormones and other additives they add to our food. Did you know there were over 2000 food additives in products on supermarket shelves back in the 70s? How many more do you think there are now? It's no wonder people develop allergies, sensitivities and diseases as a result. And even die from it.

    Roundup ready is one altered gene and the result is called TRANSGENIC, that is something from another species etc. And no, it cannot escape.....

    Oh, yes it does. And I've been hearing these stories for years, from people who have seen it happening, not the media. I think Vanity Fair and its staff have more credentials than you.

    matte

    Vanity fair...c'mon.....

    I worked in a plant research organisation - I KNOW the science and I wrote about it. I don't rely on hearsay evidence - or some rumours repeated in some magazine.

    Your report would have been much better if supported by scientific evidence.

    I am as open to opinion as the next person, but I have done the reading, I have seen the scientific processes, I have done dozens of interviews,  I have seen the safeguards. I do not rely on emotive hyperbole.

    This post needed to have the other side of the argument given. Now it is. Personally I would prefer my food that has not had all sorts of sprays on it, by using gene discovery to identify those genes that resist insect attack and having the plant bred so that this gene was evident.

    Here is some good reading, in simple English. It it worth educating yourself on this, otherwise, yes, you will come across as a fear monger and panic merchant, just like Vanity Fair. Report from both sides.

    http://web.archive.org/web/20040418222504/http://www.dpi.qld.gov.au/biotechnology/

     and the links from this page http://web.archive.org/web/20040418224506/www.dpi.qld.gov.au/biotechnology/7513.html

     

     

    René

    Oh, what plant research organisation was that? And I did do a lot of research. And I do read labels, and clean out my pantry.

    White Noise

    Monsanto is one scary psychotic corporation for sure…

     

    PROOF OF CONCEPT

    Americans have been drinking pus filled milk for years now…

     

     

     

    YouTube - Fox News Kills Monsanto Milk Story

     

    Investigative news report regarding cancer-causing additives ...
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=axU9ngbTxKw

     

     

    Milk: America’s Health Problem

    Monsanto Co., the manufacturer of rBGH, has influenced U. S. product safety laws permitting the sale of unlabeled rBGH milk. (Monsanto would lose billions ...
    www.preventcancer.com/consumers/general/milk.htm

    Monsanto's Genetically Modified Milk Ruled Unsafe by The United Nation...

    The Codex Alimentarius Commission, the U.N. Food Safety Agency representing 101 nations worldwide, has ruled unanimously in favor of the 1993 European moratorium on Monsanto's genetically engineered hormonal milk (rBGH). This unexpected ruling, revealingly greeted by the U.S. press with deafeningsilence, is a powerful blow against U.S. global trade policies which are strongly influenced by powerful multi-national corporations, such as Monsanto.

    It is now 15 years since Monsanto embarked on a series of large scale veterinary trials on rBGH all over the U.S., and sold milk from these trials to an ...
    www.preventcancer.com/publications/pdf/PR_Monsanto_aug1899.htm

     

    Battle the Monsanto Milk Beast

    Since consumers overwhelmingly reject this adulteration, Monsanto lobbyists got our government to let this milk be marketed with no labeling of the ...

    www.alternet.org/story/18138/  

    RbGH is linked to pus and blood entering the milk of cows, ...
    http://cronespeaks.wordpress.com/2007/07/05/drink-your-pus-increase-your-cancer-risk-and-stop-complaining-so-monsanto-can-make-millions/

     

    Got Milk? Monsanto’s Milk is a Murky rBGH Mess.6 Mar 2008 ... Monsanto doesn’t want us to know what’s in the milk we’re drinking. ... The cows also suffer from birth disorders, pus in their milk, ...
    www.coloradolaw.net/blog/misc/got-milk-monsantos-milk-is-a-murky-rbgh-mess-86694/


     

    SORRY IF YOU HAVE TO READ THIS WHILE ENJOYING YOUR COFFEE :)

    René

    Thanks for stepping in, White Noise. Monsanto is now going after alfalfa and sugar beets, but this time farmers are fighting back. See the stories on EnvironmentalNews

    The lawsuit asserts that the genetically modified alfalfa will probably contaminate conventionally grown alfalfa at a fast pace, ultimately forcing farmers to pay for Monsanto's patented gene technology whether they want the technology or not.

    The group says biotech alfalfa would also hurt production of organic dairy and beef products as alfalfa is a key cattle feed. And the suit claims farmers could lose export business, valued at an estimated $480 million per year, because buyers in Japan and South Korea, major importers of U.S. alfalfa, have indicated they would avoid buying U.S. alfalfa once the genetically engineered variety is released

    Plaintiffs also said Monsanto is marketing the herbicide-tolerant crop in a way that encourages far greater applications of chemicals than alfalfa typically requires.

    moonwolf

    Remember, Hillary Clinton is on Monsanto's payroll and has been for twenty years.  Imagine if she gets into the Whitehouse!

    René

    No Way!

    moonwolf

    Yes way!

    Go to this article and then Google Hillary Clinton+Monsanto.

     

    René

    Well, Monsanto contributed more money to the Republicans than to Democrats in 2006. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto#Political_contributions

    This year it looks like they are favoring Obama over Hillary, tho they liked Rudy, Tom, Mitt, and Fred even better. http://www.politicalbase.com/groups/monsanto/13227/

    After googling as you suggested, haven't found much 'bad stuff', a lot of repeats of the same letter over and over.

    Monsanto is another huge domineering corporation and Clinton has promised to take on these corporations. I believe her. But that is my choice. There were a lot of things Bill did that Hillary didn't agree with.

     

    moonwolf
    good stuff:

     

     

    White Noise

    Artificial Foods and Corporate Crops: Can We Escape the 'Frankenstate'?:  Taking a technological approach to agriculture has put the future of the world's food supply in jeopardy.
    http://www.alternet.org/environment/83301/

    matte

    that article does not support its arguments - it treats Genetic Engineering with a broad brush and so is wrong in its statements.

    Did you know that pidgeon breeder, dog breeder, cow breeders, horse breeders all use Genetic Engineering! Selective breeding is a process of ensuring the genes with the desirable attributes are included. Biotechnology merely allows this process to be hastened through the use of techniques to identify that the genesare in place.

    In the early days in the Middle East this election process was used to develop wheat that had more than 6 grains on the head to increase productivity.

    So next time you are at the garden center, don't buy that nice rose - it has been genetically engineered by  corporation to rip you off.....

    Oh, and NEVER take antibiotics - 100% of those are engineered - so if they are in hospital dying, will anti GE people stand by their principles - I don't think so...

    René

    I guess you're the genetic engineering advocate, Matte.
    Antibiotics nearly killed me! and many others. And being in a hospital
    is no guarantee that one will get good treatment or be protected from
    anything. My grandfather died from a disease he contracted while in a
    hospital. I could go on, but what's the use with you?


    You don't seem to think there are any dangers involved with genetic
    engineering. I thought you had a better mind than that, Matte.

    René

    Since you're the genetic engineering advocate, Matte, please show proof to me and the rest of us that genetically modified crops and food animals do not cause problems nor this "Terrifying Disease".

    Don't just spout that stuff you've been spouting. It is in no way reassuring.

    matte

    I have offered good links, please refer to my earlier reply and read them.

    You are also confusing hospital visits with this issue.

    Yes some people are allergic to antibiotics - I am allergic to oranges and lemons, but that does not stop me eating food.

    Please, do not take an article in a popularist magazine like vanity fair to be correct. They write for the audience, not always facts.

    And please, please , please get you use of terms right- Genetic Engineering is NOT the same as transgenics. Let me give you an example of GE.

    Lets say you have some pumpkins in your patch that grow extra big - you take pollen from these and put it on other pumpkins you have that don't get powdery mildew.. The result is if the genes have been merged is a big pumpkin that resists powdery mildew. Do that and you have taken part in genetic engineering. The result is one of those dreaded hybrids......in fact this is EXACTLY what was done with wheat 3,000 years ago.

    No, lets introduce biotechnology into this...by using gene markers. All this is doing is identifying the gene for size and the gene for PM resistance and when the 'cross' has been done using gene technology to identify that both genes are in the result. No voodoo science there.


    By ranting and using non-scientific reference points and not using the terminology correctly, the anti GE/ GM lobby merely reinforces the perception of others they they are non-informed and misguided people who are merely following an emotive argument.

    René

    You're the one who brought up hospital visits.

    matte

    Hospitals - In relation to antibiotics, not catching diseases in hospital or the small percentage of people allergic to penicillin

    René

    Good Troll

    Sign In or Join Add a comment

    Your email is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

    May 1, 2008 at 07:58 pm by René, 856 views, 27 comments

    is reporting from

    closeSign in to NowPublic