U.S. Supreme Court: State Medical Marijuana Laws Not Preempted by Federal Law

by mabone | December 2, 2008 at 11:49 am
819 views | 5 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

Awesome

Awesome

see larger image

uploaded by feelmystic

Dec-01-2008 22:57 U.S. Supreme Court: State Medical Marijuana Laws Not Preempted by Federal Law Salem-News.com

Medical marijuana case appealed by the City of Garden Grove was denied review today.


U.S. Supreme Court building- the end of the line for legal matters in the United States of America.
Photo courtesy: britannica.com

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) - The U.S. Supreme Court refused to review a landmark decision today in which California state courts found that its medical marijuana law was not preempted by federal law.

The state appellate court decision from November 28th 2007, ruled that "it is not the job of the local police to enforce the federal drug laws." The case, involving Felix Kha, a medical marijuana patient from Garden Grove, was the result of a wrongful seizure of medical marijuana by local police in June 2005.

Medical marijuana advocates hailed today's decision as a huge victory in clarifying law enforcement's obligation to uphold state law. Advocates assert that better adherence to state medical marijuana laws by local police will result in fewer needless arrests and seizures.

In turn, this will allow for better implementation of medical marijuana laws not only in California, but also in Oregon and Washington and other states that have adopted such laws.

"It's now settled that state law enforcement officers cannot arrest medical marijuana patients or seize their medicine simply because they prefer the contrary federal law," said Joe Elford, Chief Counsel with Americans for Safe Access (ASA), the medical marijuana advocacy organization that represented the defendant Felix Kha in a case that the City of Garden Grove appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

"Perhaps, in the future local government will think twice about expending significant time and resources to defy a law that is overwhelmingly supported by the people of our state."

A clear example of a California law enforcement agency wasting large amounts of time and money trying to bring down a lawful medical marijuana dispensary owner, is found in the story of San Luis Obispo County Sheriff Pat Hedges, who brought in federal agents to bust a man for helping sick people in a way that was approved by his fellow California voters. In fact it reads like a bad movie. (see Tim King's Salem-News.com article: Meet California's Lawless Sheriff)

California medical marijuana patient Felix Kha was pulled over by the Garden Grove Police Department and cited for possession of marijuana, despite Kha showing the officers proper documentation. The charge against Kha was subsequently dismissed, with the Superior Court of Orange County issuing an order to return Kha's wrongfully seized 8 grams of medical marijuana.

The police, backed by the City of Garden Grove, refused to return Kha's medicine and the city appealed. Before the 41-page decision was issued a year ago by California's Fourth District Court of Appeal, the California Attorney General filed a "friend of the court" brief on behalf of Kha's right to possess his medicine. The California Supreme Court then denied review in March.

"The source of local law enforcement's resistance to upholding state law is an outdated, harmful federal policy with regard to medical marijuana," said ASA spokesperson Kris Hermes.

"This should send a message to the federal government that it's time to establish a compassionate policy more consistent with the 13 states that have adopted medical marijuana laws."

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
smkn420love

The issue of state and national marijuana laws is one that promises to continue in to the future, and now with more states adopting decriminalization policies to deal with small time marijuana possession the national legalization of marijuana for medicinal use is not far off. Just as the supreme court repealed its decision to illegalize alcohol in the 1930's, it will soon realize the potential benefits of legalizing medicinal marijuana, as-well as the added bonus of taxing those users if the government seizes control of marijuana. By taking the power away from the current street purveyors of this drug and in effect taking much of the potential for street and gang violence out of the equation, marijuana will be as american as Budwieser. 

This subject is one that will be quite relevant in the future and i feel this article shines much needed light on the subject. 

Thanks NowPublic, 

Sincerely,Smkn420love

1
Dawn Newlon

Marijuana was made illegal because it is considered that it has a high potential of abuse, it could not be taxed, and there are no accepted medical uses. But studies have shown that marijuana does have a lot of medical uses. It “is an anti-nauseant for cancer chemotherapy.”( http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=4393). There have been other studies conducted that prove the use of marijuana to help with the loss of appetite, mood swings, migraines, rheumatism, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, and other medical problems. It is because of the stereotypes about those who smoke pot that give marijuana its bad name. The possibility of people abusing the drug is just as bad as alcohol. Some of the current drugs used for medical purposes could be considered even more addictive than marijuana. Such as morphine, pain killers, and anti depressants are all highly addictive medically used substances. The use of marijuana as a medical drug should be allowed to be researched further and should be legalized as a medical use in all states. If this drug can reduce pain and not cause a patient to become dependent upon its use then it should be allowed to be used for medical purposes. At least decriminalize the possession of marijuana in certain amounts because there have been so many court cases against those people who do use the drug for medical purposes. Nothing bad has ever come from the use of marijuana, less that person is allergic to it, and to prove this there should definitely be further tests done on its affects.

1
Tsk Tsk

Quoting a whole story verbatim without adding anything isn't quoting, it's copyright infringement (even if you list who you're stealing it from).

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Cypresso
First Flagged at 6:46 PM, Dec 2, 2008 by Cypresso
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Health

Recommendations (5)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from