Vancouver DTES: Worst slumlords should be fined, activists insist

by Barry Artiste | January 18, 2009 at 06:45 am
181 views | 2 Recommendations | 1 comment

Photos

Slum Lodgings-Photo-01

Slum Lodgings-Photo-01

see larger image

uploaded by Barry Artiste

Barry Artiste, Op/Ed

Though I have not had dealings with these hotels or family, except the Cobalt since the suicide at the Cobalt last Summer 2008, you have to realise not all landlords are slumlords, many have just given up fixing their places when the tenants who continually destroy their hotels or fail to get evicted for Drug Dealing, Fighting etc. Landlords feel helpless when even the city will not intervene in evicting the drug dealers and criminal element from these places. So you see, a double edged sword. Though I am sure there are slumlords, there are exceptions.

Take a look at Chinatown, at one time a tourist mecca, a beautiful area to visit, merchants there pay taxes, do their best to keep their storefronts clean, yet are constantly bombarded by DTES druggies and criminals stealing to urinating on their produce to accosting tourists etc.

One would think the city would act on behalf of these hard working Merchants whose business and property taxes are through the roof. The city leaves these merchants to their own devices. 

I ask you why the hell are these Merchants paying taxes and not getting help? I'll tell ya, the city fears to tread where protestors reign.  Time to stop the Politically correct crap and start kicking Ass and rid the DTES of the criminals who prey on everyone.

The B.C. government should fine Vancouver's worst slumlords until they bring their skid-row hotels up to basic living standards, housing activists said yesterday.

Since March, the Residential Tenancy Branch of B.C. has had the power to impose fines of up to $5,000 a day on landlords who break the law by allowing their rental properties to hit rock bottom.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
eastvanray

These landlords have little to no incentive to invest in these properties.  If they do they would have to raise the rents.  Raising the rents would eliminate the ability of many of their tennants to afford to live in these suites.  As long as the majority of the tennants live on welfare (restricing their ability to pay higher rents) there will be no change in the conditions of these hotals. 

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

eastvanray
First Flagged at 1:52 PM, Jan 18, 2009 by eastvanray
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (2)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from