NP Rank:
Wind energy causing health fears
We have previous articles written about the U.S. leading in the world's energy production here. At first glance, this seems like a reason to celebrate as U.S. is moving towards more of a natural way of producing energy. However, recent study shows when the turbines are built too close to housing areas, people start to have problems with sleeping, headaches, and night terrors.
"The medical thing" is new research suggesting that living close to wind turbines, as Eaton and her 60-year old husband, Mike, soon will be doing, can cause sleep disorders, difficulty with equilibrium, headaches, childhood "night terrors" and other health problems.
Dozens of wind turbines are taking shape along Oregon 74, a designated Oregon Scenic Byway, near the home the Eatons have shared for 19 years.
Dr. Nina Pierpont of Malone, N.Y., coined the phrase "wind turbine syndrome" for what she says happens to some people living near wind energy farms. She has made the phrase part of the title of a book she's written called "Wind Turbine Syndrome: A Report on the Natural Experiment." It is scheduled for publication next month by K-Selected Press
Why it causes health problems:
Pierpont's findings suggest that low-frequency noise and vibration generated by wind machines can have an effect on the inner ear, triggering headaches; difficulty sleeping; tinnitus, or ringing in the ears; learning and mood disorders; panic attacks; irritability; disruption of equilibrium, concentration and memory; and childhood behavior problems.
Concerns also are coming out of Europe about low-frequency noise from newly built wind turbines. For example, British physician Amanda Harry, in a February 2007 article titled "Wind Turbines, Noise and Health," wrote of 39 people, including residents of New Zealand and Australia, who suffered from the sounds emitted by wind turbines.
As more and more turbines are built and the demand for the usage of wind energy increases, scientists and the government needs to look into this issue. I think as long as it is built outside the proximity areas of habitants, people should be fine.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
melmerdr
Dearborn Heights, Michigan, United States -
cfimages
Taiwan -
Dominique Pipet
France -
deplaqer
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States -
Michael Foley Photography
Arlington, Virginia, United States -
We are both wrong
Lafayette, Colorado, United States -
Greenpeace Southeast Asia
Philippines -
Nicholas Lopez
Modesto, California, United States -
JeffHuang
Berkeley, California, United States -
Devin Blake
Lubbock, Texas, United States -
kimberlyfaye
Falls Church, Virginia, United States -
jimf0390
Sioux City, Iowa, United States -
Megloops
Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada -
ibelli
San Francisco, California, United States -
gnulp
Finland -
drgbailey
Abilene, Texas, United States -
goodredroad
Netherlands -
cseeman
Saline, Michigan, United States -
mnmz2 Teresa Marie
Liberty Hill, Texas, United States -
Anton Schedlbauer
München, Germany -
Peter Heilmann
Cologne, Germany -
grundi1
Austria -
jayayess1190
Glenside, Pennsylvania, United States -
shawnmlopez
Bowling Green, Ohio, United States -
foreby
Sweden -
rotciv97
Brooklyn, New York, United States -
beaumontpete
Canada -
Mr.MR.82
Italy -
JasonParlour
Reading, United Kingdom -
anna@germany
Berlin, Germany -
diewalaz
Germany -
KentV999
El Paso, Texas, United States -
Paul Henderson
Inverness, United Kingdom -
happylittlefriend
San Francisco, California, United States -
boston_denyba
Reading, Massachusetts, United States -
mzaalam
london, United Kingdom -
yoriko
Tokyo, Japan -
drexelpike
Mays Landing, New Jersey, United States -
yourstilllife
Norman, Oklahoma, United States -
francis2004
Quincy, Illinois, United States -
pencea
Romania -
Mickey and Kristen
Indio, California, United States -
gscheiterl
Austria -
JGH52
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States -
capella_7009
Houston, Texas, United States -
HatchCraft.com
Saint Albans, West Virginia, United States -
Slagoe
Newport News, Virginia, United States -
mgunter
Shawnee, Oklahoma, United States -
modernmuseum
Andrews, Texas, United States -
David E. Starr
Lombard, Illinois, United States -
fleas2016
Philippines -
Scrauso
Italy -
themactep
Russia
Recommendations (11)

Anonymous user














Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (25)
at 22:51 on August 14th, 2008
our town has done an exceptional job in the planning, introduction and phased expansion of its wind farm. Far enough outside the city limits...next to the landfill; a widely avoided piece of property...and well removed from those who may be affected by it. Hopefully no one decides to build a house next to it.
shawnmlopez has contributed a photo to this story.
at 00:24 on August 15th, 2008
Interesting story... but anyway we know that everything have side-effects. I think that wind energy is a great idea, and in Spain where i've been, wind turbines have been built outside the proximity areas of habitants, and no one have health problem. It's a simple planning problem... And wind turbines are just like any other factory.
at 01:09 on August 15th, 2008
JeffHuang, I like this story. It's good stuff.
I think we should worry more about the impact of Nuclear waste and Dioxin waste affecting Human health at to far greater extend then Wind frequency ever could.
Tackle the worst first before worrying about the least harmful!
at 01:46 on August 15th, 2008
Yes, and I bet living next to a nuclear power station makes you glow in the dark, grow an extra head and influence compasses.
I took one of the pictures fetured and it looks like the girl in blue (my daughter) is covering her ears, this is misleading as she is actually pulling her hood up because it had just started raining.
We have a local wind farm (pictured) and we love it. It's beautiful, quiet, let me say that again, it is quiet and does nothing but make a positive impact on the environment. There are no piles of dead birds underneath them, sheep happily graze around them and the locals all seem a cheerful and friendly as they have ever been. Or is it just me and they've all gone mad through sleep deprivation.
at 02:53 on August 15th, 2008
JeffHuang, I like this story. It's good stuff.
I know that, despite farmer's initial fears, livestock in the Lake District soon got used to wind-farms being in their pastures. I wonder if people will just need a similar amount of time to adjust. We don't flinch every time a plane flies overhead - It'll probably take resident's brains a while to adjust to this new 'background noise. In the meantime, this report risks playing into the hands of the people who would protest against the building of wind-farms.
I'd be intrigued to see the results of a longer-term study.
at 04:35 on August 15th, 2008
It is a good idea to remain skeptical about such findings. Especially when it says "X wrote a book" instead of "X published a research paper".
Only a controlled study is a reliable way to determine actual health effects. A sampling of 10 families in one location is not credible IMO.
It is quite easy to make some quick money based on vague fears or by providing fodder for the propaganda mills of those who are opposed to wind energy for various non health related reasons.
The family described in the article is obviously primarily concerned about the scenic view they are loosing and the loss of property value they expect. They are concerned about potential headaches, but it does not say that they are actually affected.
at 04:57 on August 15th, 2008
A windmill on a Batic sea shore in Kaliningrad region, Russia.
themactep has contributed a photo to this story.
at 05:52 on August 15th, 2008
Taken at the Rothes Windfarm, at Cairn Uish near Elgin is the first windfarm consented by Scottish Ministers under the devolved powers of section 36 of the Electricity Act. It will provide enough power to meet around 29 per cent of Moray's total demand for electricity, the equivalent to the average annual consumption of 32,000 households.
Paul Henderson has contributed a photo to this story.
at 06:13 on August 15th, 2008
This photo was taken from the top of Mt. Scott near Lawton, OK. There is a large wind turbine farm there, as you see. Although we did not go there, I am fascinated by the power of these turbines. I dont know if I agree that these are more of a health risk than electricity obtained with the power plants we use now and I really dont see how they could be worse. I live in Oklahoma and I feel that although we are a big supplier of oil and natural gas that we have the resource of the wind also and why not use it for a cleaner alternative to drilling and destroying the land. As Americans we destroy and waste so much in search of better living and saving money (or making money in some cases) that is really isnt worth the price our future generations have to endure. I think an alternative fuel source is a great idea, I just hope we make the right decisions whatever that may be.
mgunter has contributed a photo to this story.
at 06:15 on August 15th, 2008
Thank you for the opportunity to have a voice. This is out of my comfort zone really, but I am glad to contribute something. Mgunter~~Oklahoma
at 07:02 on August 15th, 2008
These wind turbines in my submitted photo are located on Route 219 near Thomas, West Virginia. There are quite a few that line the ridges around there and their shear size and magnitude is pretty stunning. There isn't much developed around them thankfully, now considering the possible health concerns. We need to keep fighting for cleaner alternate energy sources. Check out http://www.hatchcraft.com to view more of my photo work.
HatchCraft.com has contributed a photo to this story.
at 07:46 on August 15th, 2008
First of all: whenever you read a study you have to know who was the sponsor of that study!
It is also said that the periodic shadows from the rotor causes serious health troubles.
But even if all this concerns are reasonable, there should always be the possibility for remote wind farms or offshore wind parks. The higher losses of power over long distances can be more than compensated with new technology like HVDC (high voltage direct current).
Here a few examples for population densities:
Australia:7 per sq. mi.
Canada: 9 per sq. mi.
Germany: 610 per sq. mi.
U. S. A.: 83 per sq. mi. average, New Jersey 1,134, California 217, Montana 6
Figures 2000
So, serious surveys should not be used as arguments against wind power, but as arguments to use it deliberate, like we should do it with every technology.
at 08:11 on August 15th, 2008
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3272/2657703770_806b64bbb7_b.jpg
With over three hundred million people now and a projected 400 million not all that far down the road. It will become harder to set aside land to build these wind machines and at the same time protect people from their effects. (If this research proves conclusive.) Maybe the research will establish a safe minimum distance and safe zones could be set aside. These areas could be as green as possible. (Not knowing what effect these sounds have on plants and animals, yet.)
All new energy sources are going to come with some trade-offs. We will just have to figure out way to implement them with minimal risk.
at 10:40 on August 15th, 2008
The wind turbines featured in my photo are just a few of the many located on and around Indian Mesa, a mostly unpopulated region just E of Fort Stockton, in the vast deserts of West Texas.
************
Very interesting article, JeffHuang.
I've always been intrigued by the idea of wind power as an alternate energy source, but had never heard of any potential health concerns from the turbines. While I do support wind energy as a green energy resource, perhaps in the future the wind power companies should make sure they "build responsibly" i.e. away from populated areas...
capella_7009 has contributed a photo to this story.
at 12:50 on August 15th, 2008
Windfarm in western Minnesota, USA
There apparently are concerns over wind turbine noise causing headaches and sleeplessness. Even if thats true, I think those problems can be more easily dealt with than huge energy costs, poluted air, and global warming associated with fossil fuels.
Just don't put the turbines near your house.
JGH52 has contributed a photo to this story.
at 04:44 on August 16th, 2008
I took this photo in France.
yoriko has contributed a photo to this story.
at 08:28 on August 16th, 2008
Since Wind Turbine Syndrome is so new, why not bring it to attention while it's still young. Let's come up with a solution before it becomes widespread. Bringing this to light now will give the wind farm producers a chance to correct this before it becomes too extensive and expensive.
at 15:48 on August 18th, 2008
I read about an effort to reduce the noise factor of wind turbines (http://www.dailytech.com/New+Anti+Noise+Addons+Silence+Noisy+Wind+Turbines/article12641.htm)
I do hope this includes the low-frequency noise mentioned in your report.
fleas2016 has contributed a photo to this story.
at 16:12 on August 18th, 2008
Photo of a windmill farm in western Kansas.
yourstilllife has contributed a photo to this story.
at 08:21 on August 19th, 2008
It was intense. I pulled off the road and there was this white monster, towering over me and threatening the foundations of the heavens, no less! It peered down at me down his long, cold nose and was like, "What." Then I was like "I'm gonna take your photo, vile beast!" And he was like, "No, you're not." Then I was like, "You can't stop me, you can't even move! Except for your head and you can only rotate." Then he was like, "You have beaten me, ill devil! I shall battle you in the afterlife of yore!" Then I ran home and posted this photo on the internets.
modernmuseum has contributed a photo to this story.
at 05:57 on August 23rd, 2008
Palm Springs - Wind Turbine Generators
anna@germany has contributed a photo to this story.
at 12:25 on August 27th, 2008
Hull Wind 1.
The Town of Hull, Massachusetts, has won the Department of Energy's Wind Power Pioneer Award. The distinction recognizes the Town of Hull for its outstanding leadership in advancing the use of wind power in a coastal community. Hull has been "a model for engaging the entire community to understand and move forward together on its wind power project, from school teachers, utility engineers and local leaders to state government, academia and industry."
boston_denyba has contributed a photo to this story.
at 12:35 on August 27th, 2008
Remind me again, please. I seem to have forgotten. What are the health consequences of coal fired power plants? Everything in life involves risk. Unless someone can point to an article in a peer reviewed journal that elaborates on this or posits a theory about this, I'll have to reserve judgement. Until then, we should proceed with caution but proceed nonetheless.
at 18:36 on September 2nd, 2008
Why is it better to site industrial wind turbines on rural mountain tops with minimal population. Are these peoples lives less important? In fact, the noise from these monsters are intensified in the rural areas especially at night. People live in these areas to escape the noise of the cities, to raise families in the quiet of the mountains, to enjoy life at its simplest. Another devastating effect is the vast deforestation, when in fact, this actually encourages global warming. You may not realize that in 20 years or less, there will be NO natural forests or mountain tops left if this destruction continues. The very ecosystems that guard against global warming will be destroyed forever.The whole issue is proper siting. Brown fields are ideal. Or better yet, since it seems that the "city" folk are the ones that are so "thrilled" by these industrial giants, they should be installed in the mall parking lots where the noise will not be noticed, and the city folks will not have to travel to the mountains to gawk and marvel at the machines that are making the lives of the rural residents so miserable. I am not against wind energy, as I do believe it has its place in the energy problem, but it by no means is the sole answer. It simply is not a reliable and consistent source of energy. Don't forget, it takes electricity to turn the tubines in the first place. In a power outage, these are useless. Also the electricity generated from these are far more expensive. Wind energy needs to be thought out carefully and sited properly. And NOT at the expense of anyone's right to peaceful and healthy living.
at 14:17 on September 19th, 2008
Many of you forget and may I remind you, us "farmers" feed you! The Wind companies come into an area "telling" us they are installing up 55 turbines, in a small area. The turbines will be installed no closer than 1000 ft from your buildings (or home) and 800 ft apart from each other. They tell us they will not take "no" for an answer, they want us to sign our wind rights and land rights over to them for 20 years! We don't get clear answers on the effects the noice, shadowing or ice (yes, the roters shoot ice chunks several feet and is deadly when it hits the ground) will cause on wildlife, livestock or people. They don't care, they see $$ and that is all.
This is a disruption to our lives, or rights and our homes! We are left with little choice then to sell and leave. But anyone who is a farmer, knows they cannot sell and start over with the cost of farming today! Farm land is becoming very scarce! Farmers care the land like a father does a child. Many of us are several generations of farmers. The turbines belong in areas that are non-populated and on non farmable land.
Maybe the city folk should look at using less electricity and we may not be in this situation! At least I can see stars every night were I live because I don't have all the damn lights on!