History Channel Description:
An Internet search for "9/11 conspiracy theories" yields nearly two
million hits. Were the attacks on 9/11 perpetrated by the Bush
Administration to advance its own interests? Could a government missile
have hit the Pentagon? As outrageous as these ideas may sound, many
people believe them. Why do these theories arise in the first place? An
interview with James Miegs, Editor-in-Chief of Popular Mechanics,
who refutes many of these theories. Watch as experts in the fields of
aeronautics, engineering and the military put these theories to the
test.
Sounds like a biased hit piece to me. Interesting to think though, if popular opinion is that nothing questionable happened, why would the history channel see the need? What do you think readers? Do you think that they will address valid points or cherry pick the weaker theories? Consider it a litmus test for the 911 conspiracies believers and skeptics alike.



Comments (0)