House OKs Specialized Patent Judges

by Jordan Yerman | February 13, 2007 at 09:42 am
255 views | 0 Recommendations | 0 comments

On the face of it, the ability to hand-ball patent cases to judges better versed in that particular facet of law is a good thing. In theory, it keeps often-technical decisions out of the hands of those who, for example, see the Internet as a series of tubes*.


The U.S. House of Representatives has approved a bill that would allow certain federal judges to defer patent cases to colleagues considered better-versed in the complex area.

The proposal, first introduced last year by Reps. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), passed unanimously on Monday as part of a series of noncontroversial bills (including, for instance, the naming of U.S. post offices). It was not immediately clear when the U.S. Senate would consider the measure.

The bill proposes setting up a process that would work something like this: In the federal district courts that hear the most patent cases, chief judges would designate judges who have requested to hear such suits. All cases would continue to be randomly assigned. But if a judge who hadn't signed up as a patent specialist received a patent-related case, he or she could opt to have it reassigned to a judge who had requested to hear that breed of dispute.

The bill would also create a "pilot program" aimed at schooling federal judges in the intricacies of patent law. The measure proposes setting aside at least $5 million in federal funds each year for "educational and professional development" of those judges and for compensation of clerks to assist them.



* Alaskan Senator Ted Stevens, Chair of the Senate Committee on Science, Commerce and Transportation

Comments (0)

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from