Is Bush Leading Us to Nuclear War?

Is Bush Leading Us to Nuclear War?

By William D. Hartung and Frida Berrigan, In These Times. Posted May 23, 2007.

While the United States demands that other countries end their nuclear programs, the Bush administration is busy planning a new generation of nuclear weapons known as "Complex 2030."

Tools

email EMAIL

print PRINT

166 COMMENTS

052307story

Share & save this story:

Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! icon

Also in Top Stories

Justice Department Liason to White House Passes the Buck in Attorneys Firing Scandal [VIDEO]

Adam Howard, AlterNet

Funding Bush's War: Are Dems Too Scared To Take on the President?

Robert L. Borosage, TomPaine.com

The FBI May Have the Inside Scoop on You

Frances Madeson, TomPaine.com

The Insanity of the U.S. Embargo on Cuba

Nathaniel Hoffman, AlterNet

How Bad Would a President Romney Be for Blacks and Latinos?

Earl Ofari Hutchinson, New America Media

Dems Cut Trade Deal with Bush; Poised to Throw American Workers Under Bus

Lori Wallach , Todd Tucker, AlterNet

More stories by William D. Hartung Frida Berrigan

RSS icon Main AlterNet RSS Feed

Get AlterNet in

your mailbox!

Advertisement

Only days before the fifth anniversary of September 11, President George W. Bush addressed military officers in Washington to warn that nuclear-armed terrorists could "blackmail the free world and spread their ideologies of hate and raise a moral threat to America."

This alarmist vision was accompanied by the White House's release of "A National Strategy for Combating Terrorism," which painted a picture of a "troubling potential WMD terrorism nexus emanating from Tehran." The administration is building the case for war against Iran -- a job made easier by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent announcement that Iran can now enrich uranium on an industrial scale -- despite the fact that many Iran-watchers and nuclear experts consider their claims of enrichment capacity to be an overblown boast.

This is not the first time the "no-nuclear-weapons-for-you" ploy has been used to lay the groundwork for a war. On Oct. 7, 2002, while making the case for regime change in Iraq, President Bush said: "America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."

Yellow cake, aluminum tubes and histrionics about Saddam Hussein's nuclear capabilities followed ... all of which were challenged at the time, and have turned out to be completely fabricated. And, when not grinding the axe of pre-emptive war as counter-proliferation strategy, the administration periodically raises the specter of nuclear terrorism, in the form of dirty bombs and suitcase-sized warheads.

But while the United States demands that other countries end their nuclear programs, the Bush administration is busy planning a new generation of nuclear weapons. Nearly 20 years after the Berlin Wall crumbled, the United States is allocating more funding, on average, to nuclear weapons than during the Cold War.

The Bush administration is pumping this money -- more than $6 billion this year -- into renovating the nuclear weapons complex and designing new nuclear weapons. Such hypocrisy is one of the main obstacles to nuclear arms reductions because it runs the risk of shattering the 1970 Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty in which the nuclear-armed states pledged to begin the process of disarmament if the non-nuclear states opted not to pursue the deadly technology.

The centerpiece of the administration's move toward developing a new generation of nuclear weapons is "Complex 2030," a multiyear plan introduced last April by the National Nuclear Security Administration (the semi-autonomous agency within the Department of Energy that oversees the nuclear weapons program).

Complex 2030 calls for the construction of new or upgraded facilities at each of the National Nuclear Security Administration's eight nuclear weapons-related sites throughout the country. The plan also calls for building a new nuclear weapon, the Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW), inside the old warheads. The program was conceived in response to concerns that the cores of existing nuclear weapons could be wearing out and need to be replaced. But RRW development has gone much further than that.