NP Rank:
The Journalist of the Future Is Here
What will it take to make "citizen journalists" a viable component of the global news-creating community? Will citizen journalists figure out how to create credible, well-researched news items in a way that will complement professional journalism? One set of answers come from a CJ writing today in OhMyNews, a Korea-based user-generated news site.
Web site operators dwelt on the cultural difficulties encountered by their venture experience in their home countries. Rostislav Vylegzhanin, co-founder and editor of Realno.info, for example, recounted veiled threats to the freedom of expression his site encounters from government harassment and self-censorship in his native Russia. Michael Tippett, co-founder of the Canadian NowPublic Web site combining camera phone photographs and breaking news events, spoke of the superior advantage citizen journalists have over mainstream journalists by simply being at the scene of distant events when they happen in real time."Mainstream journalism and citizen journalism can and should collaborate and complement each other," said Tippett, who pointed out that with a citizen journalist you can have presence where mainstream media can't arrive. Citizen journalism sites can spread a broad network and with their new technologies "re-engineer the supply of news." NowPublic has 100,000 reporters in 300 cities around the world.
Competition and suspicion should not be the model of interaction -- a widespread complaint echoed by start-up sites like the year-old Israeli site Scoop.co.il, whose chief editor Yossi Saidov said that Israeli mainstream media Yediot Aharonot, Haaretz and Maariv frequently steal their items without giving due credit.
Conference participants homed in on three key issues: how can the new media gain reputable and sustainable success? Can they remain non-profitable over time? Must they equip their "stringer" or "wrangler" reporters with the appropriate equipment and pay them a reasonable remuneration for their work?
It's interesting that these three questions seem to rise to the surface...as we see some projects not just surviving, but thriving; and others (such as WikiNews, according to a recent article in the New York Times) apparently sputtering.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
the source
New York, New York, United States -
stevegarfield
Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, United States -
dlayphoto
Lakewood, Ohio, United States -
vaXzine
Houston, Texas, United States -
marcokalmann
Switzerland (Confoederatio Helvetica) -
Lisa Padilla
San Mateo, California, United States -
mark_am_kramer
Austria -
Tuijaaalto
Finland













Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (1)
at 14:46 on July 4th, 2007
Certainly one way is to raise the expectations of sites featuring user generated content.
Just because it is user generated does not mean it is user decide - it cannot run on the web 2.0 model. There needs to be editorial reviews in place, there needs to be solid templates and minimum standards.
NP had the opportunity to be something great but chose to accept banal user input without any screening and go with "let the 'community decide' and float the good stuff to the top" approach. Sadly, the poor material still swamps anything good.
It is interesting to see that "reporters on the spot with their camera phones" myth also being perpetuated by ohmynews. Sadly most CJ just re-report existing news, often without any hint of amalgamation from different sources nor original commentary.
Mainstream media will not use citizen journalists until their writing, keenness of content and timeliness improves.
And for sites such as NP, these remain big issues - republishing, no journalistic skills and a long delay till the web 2.0 'crowd discovers it' till it floats to the top will kill it every time.
Perhaps the best site for user input news is wikinews, but they don't make the mistake of calling it citizen journalism.
The final issue that needs to be addressed is remuneration...good stuff does not come for free.