Law Firm Asks Homeless Man for $1,000 Retainer

by jr | August 23, 2007 at 11:31 am
542 views | 0 Recommendations | 3 comments

Lawson Lundell, a major law firm in downtown Vancouver, has asked homeless man Bill Simpson for a $1,000 retainer. Simpson received the request in an Aug. 18th e-mail from Tom Woods, who identified himself as head of the Lawson Lundell Defamation and Media Law Practice.

Simpson had been hoping for a little pro bono help from Lawson Lundell in what is believed to be a clear cut libel case against the Carnegie Center Association (and some say, the City of Vancouver). The writer apologized and admitted in writing that he had published "libellous commentary" about Simpson.


[...]

Woods told Simpson in the e-mail that after he paid the "up front" $1,000, he would be charged $400/hr. for his services as a senior lawyer. Woods would attempt, though, to recruit a junior lawyer to work under his supervision, whose time would go for $250 - $325/hr. Woods acknowledged that Simpson might find these "high numbers", so he offered to provide him with a number to call to get the names of lawyers outside the downtown core who have lower fees.

Unfortunately anything other than FREE is outside Simpson's price range. He sleeps in the park.  He has no job and doesn't get welfare.

Simpson appeared disheartened by the email from Woods. He had believed that Lawson Lundell was aware that he was homeless. When he had dropped off material at the law firm pertaining to his case, he had included a link to his website, Downtown Eastside Enquirer .ca and to a blog, both of which identify him as homeless.

Simpson says it is possible that Woods had not reviewed the websites and was not aware that he was homeless.


To read this entire original article, see Downtown Eastside Enquirer

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Vinny

Hi jr you seemed to have posted this story 3 times, could you please delete 2 of the 3 postings. Many thanks vinny1

0
jr

The computer I'm using is really slow so I pressed the Submit button three times because it didn't seem to be working.  The end result was that multiple copies of the story showed up on the screen.  I've deleted them now.

0
Vinny

Thanks for deleting the other 2 jr, I guessed it was a problem with the submit process and not intentional.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from