NP Rank:
The Calculus of Saying “I Love You”
by cynthia yoo | December 12, 2007 at 02:53 pm
1311 views | 7 Recommendations | 10 comments
An oldie but goody(sorry rob peters) article (from Anna Gosline) on how love's progression can be mapped out, sloped out, tangentially and otherwise...'till it slowly ever so slowly (one would hope) reaches near zero...
The writer's friend found a new beau who was a brilliant engineer. Perhaps a bit too early into their courtship, she asked her new paramour, THAT question:
The Engineer, delightful and rational fellow that he is, made it clear that he would not be saying “I love you” until he was sure. Otherwise, he might waste this very important statement by saying it too early in the relationship, when his love was still growing rapidly, thereby taking away the significance in later weeks/months when his love was much, much greater.
Judy(writer's friend), obviously disappointed by this response, pressed and asked WHEN exactly that would be.
His response: when dLove/dt = zero.
The writer and her friend, Judy, had to figure out this equation.
For those of you who have forgotten your calculus (or blocked it out, or, lucky you, never took it at all) let me explain: he will say “I love you” when the slope of the tangent to the growth curve of his love has reached zero. This indicates of a local maximum and means that the rate of growth (the velocity of love, as it were) has slowed to a stop.
The two friends came to a new level of female "over-thinking" those random doozies that men send women's way.
As Judy and I were discussing his response, we found it concerning on several levels. Firstly, if the curve of his love is akin to figure (a) then after he says I love you, he will actually begin to love her less. Which bodeth not well for their long term relationship survival. So then, let’s be generous and suggest the curve of his love is better approximated by figure (b), where the plateau of zero growth might indicate the end of honeymoon/infatuation-type love (a bit late, but not a BAD time to say I love you), which then moves on promptly on to another growth phase, the build up of life-long-partnership-love and the having of babies.
url="http://www.inklingmagazine.com/articles/the-calculus-of-saying-i-love-you/"]But
the second distressing aspect of the whole affair was that somewhere
along the line Judy had also mentioned the term “second derivative.”
And neither of us could actually remember what this was. We both
recalled HOW to take a second derivative (indeed Judy and I took
calculus together many years ago), but we couldn’t remember what it
actually meant.[/q]
Freaked out, the two friends go to even deeper depths:
Enter massive calculus textbook from our 1st year class (Judy hates throwing away text books).
After searching in the index and finding some helpful examples, we remembered that AHA! the second derivative is akin to acceleration: the rate of rate of growth. And by solving for the second derivative - d2 (love)/dt2 - we could ensure that when d(love)/dt = 0, it is a local maximum (the greatest love), not a local minimum (not the greatest love of all). For when the second derivative is negative = local maximum, as in figure (a); when positive, it’s a local minimum, as in figure (c) (Refresh your memory here). All is happy.
But, you see, I have come up with a better solution. The first few weeks or months of a relationship often result in a very rapid growth of love. Indeed you could even say love is accelerating at a break necking pace (oh har, sorry) not merely speeding along in a linear fashion. Of course this psychotic rampage in love growth can only continue apace for so long and eventually the acceleration will drop to zero, though the absolute value of love is still growing - ie the velocity or d(love)/dt is still greater than zero. An exemplary graph of said derivative can be seen in figure (d).
Luckily, the writer ends with an analogy for a liberal arts grad such as myself:
Try this math teacheresque example; it’s like Judy and the Engineer have the pedal to metal, building up speed along the on ramp to the freeway of love. But once they merge on, and find a nice lane, they can continue traveling at a constant rate, save for pit stops (fights) and the occasionally passing of trucks (make-up sex). Or better yet, let’s say that falling in love is really actually like falling, wherein the acceleration = 9.8 meters per second squared. When you finally slam into the ground (or reach terminal velocity, which ever suits your particular romantic scenario) and start acting like a normal human beings, instead of a driveling, love-crazed sociopaths, then you know its really time to start saying “I love you.”
In either case, the Engineer should in fact solve for zero in the second derivative to the love-time function and say “I love you” when love has stopped accelerating. This solves the concerning problem of having to wait until his love has stopped growing. Because zero growth in the love function is likely to make any woman, chemist, calculus enthusiast or otherwise, pretty goddamn pissed off.
Was this as good for you as it was for me?
Crowd Power
First Flagged at 4:36 PM, Dec 12, 2007 by liamssoft
These members have powered this story:-
Jeremy Brooks
Richmond, California, United States -
cynthia yoo
Vancouver, Canada -
smugglerkiss
Keene, New Hampshire, United States -
Aivija
Lithuania
















Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (10)
at 16:36 on December 12th, 2007
cynthia yoo, Good stuff.
at 18:04 on December 12th, 2007
I only say I love you when I'm factoring polynomials. It has that effect on me.
Unrelatedly, The Factored Polynomials is a great band name.
at 18:27 on December 12th, 2007
This sign was written on an old manila envelope, attached to a 1960's era light pole and hung with a screw.
at 19:08 on December 12th, 2007
doobieous, thanks for the photo...it's lovely to see how people interpret emotions into visuals...
rob peters, your polynomials has no effect on me...
at 21:43 on December 12th, 2007
at 08:35 on December 13th, 2007
at 08:59 on December 13th, 2007
The Love
at 10:33 on December 13th, 2007
... a day that my eyes were 'heart-shaped'? LOL,
M, (*_*)
FOR MORE: magdaindigo.blogspot.com/
at 15:47 on December 13th, 2007
I drew the figure after talking about parents with a friend of mine. He said that his, though perhaps not each others 'the one,' suited each other enough that they stayed together not wasting effort finding a more suitable match. That a number of standard deviations away from the norm of complete numbness towards somebody is enough. There's no need to go to the ends of the earth searching for the 'one' when given finite lifetimes a near match will do when we can spend the rest of our time enjoying one another and ironing out the kinks. I suppose you could draw parallels with the law of diminishing returns.
at 18:40 on December 13th, 2007
if you want to see more photos enter to:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/artelimado