NP Rank:
Vancouver Airport Taser death raises questions
by mpress | October 15, 2007 at 07:17 am | 2224 views | 18 comments
Tasers are being used more often and if you have a weak heart it can kill you. So when will those who use tasers realize that they must only be used as a last resort?
A provincial expert on Tasers is raising questions about RCMP methods after a man died at Vancouver International Airport early Sunday, shortly after being shocked with the weapon.Dr. John Butt said that because of the length of time between the death and the shock, it likely wasn't the 50,000 volts of electricity that killed the man, who was in his 40s.
But Butt, who co-authored a report on Tasers for B.C.'s police complaint commissioner in 2005, told The Vancouver Sun that questions need to be asked about the way police restrained the man after the shock, and whether that led to his death.
News Tools
October 15, 2007 at 07:17 am by mpress, 2224 views, 18 comments
Crowd Power
First Flagged at 7:38 AM, Oct 15, 2007 by Brian A Kennedy
These members have powered this story:






Add a comment
Comments (18)
- reply
Brian A Kennedyat 07:38 on October 15th, 2007
Good stuff, mpress.
at 10:27 on October 15th, 2007
My question would be after getting two shots with a Taser and still be fighting as if nothing happened, and still being able to fight off three officers to try and restrain him, must have scared the crap out of the officers. RCMP officers know how powerful a Taser shot is, as they too have initially undergone being shot with a Taser as part of their training and know how powerful a Taser Shot is. The guy had to be on Drugs, and strong as a bull.
at 10:51 on October 15th, 2007
What many people don't realize is that: a) people tend to be heavily armed these days and often officers don't know what they have on them until they're subdued b) the effect of drugs c) the effect of adrenaline and d) how officers really don't want to be beaten up if they can avoid it. Taser is an intermediate step.
When someone refuses to obey orders, and then is hard for even more than one officer to subdue, and indicates that he/she will keep on fighting, should officers take continued risks? If they hit back, with fists or batons, even if the suspect has hit and kicked, sometimes bitten them,then people yell "brutality." Should they just let them go if they fight? If they fight back, charges of brutality. If they taze, ditto.
One of my police friends, whose first K9 partner came from me, one night got called out with his dog. Seems that some guy was fighting being arrested. He'd battled 11 officers, had hurt a few, and had bitten off part of one officer's ear (gone forever). Yes, there are legitimate fears of AIDS, too, and other diseases--when suspects spit, bite, etc. they're adding another layer of danger. My friend and his dog rolled up, got out of the car, and my friend said "stop or I take the dog off the leash."
The guy stopped. But when they put him in the car, he kicked out the rear window, cursing and yelling and threatening. So my friend said "stop or the dog rides with you." The guy stopped.
Had the officers had Tasers then, maybe several of them wouldn't have gone to the hospital.
All too often, those who aren't there, don't know police procedure, don't know all the dangers involved (syringes in pockets, spitting, biting), or maybe just plain hate cops (until they need one) criticize if officers put someone on the ground, hit them, taze them, bring a dog in to scare them. If officers are arresting someone, especially someone they believe to be dangerous to themselves or others, they simply can't just back off and give up if someone fights or wn't obey.
Yes, officers need to exercise care in the use of batons or tazers. Because they have to file reports on what level of force they have to do, and must be able to justify force, officers on the whole aren't indiscriminate with their tools. Are there "tough cops" or cops who make mistakes? Sure thing. Any profession, any job, has different levels of competency-- doctors can be dangerous, too.
If you are an officer and there's a suspect who will not listen to your instructions, are you then obligated to let the suspect do bodily harm to you in order to pre-appease the public? No.
at 11:06 on October 15th, 2007
mpress, ooops forgot the GS flag before.
Dialogue can help understanding of the challenges faced in apprehending someone. Also: how people react (cardiac, breathing, etc.) is variable and unpredictable to even restrained.
at 11:41 on October 15th, 2007
Thanks PEP Law enforcement is a very thankless job and stressful.
- reply
gryphonat 12:47 on October 15th, 2007
mpress, good story. Here is the counterpoint: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5io9iL875oml2E9PhcF5HWURcF6qQD8S5IISG0
at 13:21 on October 15th, 2007
mpress, thank you for posting this. While I agree that law enforcement is a generally thankless job, I also think tasering is cruel and unusual punishment. Police enforced the law for hundreds of years without tasering, and as far as I can tell (in this case and a few others) the main reason for using tasers instead of batons is public relations.
This, too, is understandable since police are more closely scrutinized now--esp. since Rodney King--but I just think there has to be another way to restrain and calm a suspect. Tasering may not have been directly responsible for his death, but I'm sure tasering didn't help.
One interesting note about tasering in Canada--the CBC is reporting that of the 16 tasering deaths in Canada over the last four years, six have happened in BC. I feel this is incredibly high; too high, if you ask me.
And yes, the coroners in these cases have sometimes ruled that the deaths are not connected to the tasering, but come on...16 deaths in four years, and the people all died shortly after being tasered?
- reply
gryphonat 13:49 on October 15th, 2007
Kaitlin-
If you click thru the link I posted above, you will see that this has been studied and proven that Tasers are safe.
- reply
gryphonat 13:52 on October 15th, 2007
at 14:17 on October 15th, 2007
Tasers are most likely safer than Beanbag shot. The officers are tasked to protect public safety, and when that is comprimised with little end in sight and officers are in danger Tasering will result as a more humane way instead of bullets or batons. If officers failed to react, who knows what the public outcry would have been if this maniac killed an innocent bystander or officer. The man would not listen to reasoning, hence this tragic occurance. It's not like these officers woke up and said lets kill someone today. The man died based on the consequences of his action, better on the ground, than taking a planeload of passengers in the air with him. Not a pretty scenario, but sometimes all too real.
at 14:56 on October 15th, 2007
There are a variety of tools officers can use, and they all have pluses and minuses. Some people protest if tear gas or pepper spray is used. Or bean bags.
The U.S. has had its highest midyear levels of officer deaths in nearly three decades.
Some have referred to the new "hunter mentality" aimed at harming and killing cops.
Before the recent upsurge in attacks on police, in the U.S. one cop is killed approximately every 58 hours.
There are two bottom lines here: 1) when people resist, they will be met with resistance; and 2) a police officer shouldn't have to risk being assaulted, injured, or killed to appease critics, especially those who've never been in the field.
Every single officer on our force, who is authorized to use a Taser, has been Tasered himself or herself. As to deaths; no way an officer can know someone's health background when conflict ensues, nor can they know what drugs may be onboard that will affect them.
It's really simple: if people would do what the officer tells them to do, the tasers wouldn't come out, nor the batons, nor the beanbags, nor anything else.
Police speak in very clear sentences: put your hands on the wheel. Put your hands on your head. etc. etc. They don't want to hurt anyone; they don't want to be hurt. When people obey, arrests or traffic stops go smoothly. When they don't, or when they attack officers or flail around, they don't.
at 16:38 on October 15th, 2007
mpress, On October 3, moonwolf published an excellent piece on this topic: go to this NP PAGE
I agree with Kaitlin, it is a shocking statistic "16 tasering deaths in Canada over the last four years". What would we say if these deaths were caused by real bullets from police guns?. For some reason we all have the feeling that being tasered to death is not as bad as being shot to death (your death from a taser can now be your own fault for having a medical condition).
Yes, law enforcement is difficult and sometime dangerous, but what I have difficulty with is the inappropriate use of the Taser gun. Moonwolf's piece is a prime example and should make us all feel unsafe. Good stuff.
- reply
gryphonat 19:53 on October 15th, 2007
You may feel safer if you own a taser, Tom.
at 19:57 on October 15th, 2007
Ha Ha... No way gryphon, this is not for me. Cheers, Tom.
at 17:53 on October 15th, 2007
Thanks Tom , There is a fine line as to when to use the taser. I once saw a report that showed a sticky substance that would shoot out and imbobilize you. I wonder what happened to that. I guess it was too messy.
at 19:15 on October 15th, 2007
The sticky stuff you refer to Mpress is a Salt Water Type Taffy, messy yes, yet,delicious in the wrong hands according to a Simpsons episode, besides you need to carry a 60 pound cannon around, quite impractical. I read Moons report, quite mind changing, at least for me, another coup for Moon,.
at 20:21 on October 15th, 2007
yes I see Moon has his moments.
at 21:43 on October 15th, 2007
I always look forward to Moons stories, I may not agree with all of them, but he does good work