"Maybe the people who think there's a conspiracy out there are right"

by jamaen | July 23, 2007 at 05:29 pm
690 views | 32 Recommendations | 5 comments

Videos

Defense Authorization: DeFazio on Andrews Amendment on Iran

see larger video

sourced by Brian A Kennedy

Defense Authorization: DeFazio on Andrews Amendment on Iran

Photos

censorship

censorship

see larger image

uploaded by Vemrion

Member of the Homeland Security Committee is being denied access to documents outlining plans for the continuity of government after a significant terrorist attack.

WASHINGTON -- Oregonians called Peter DeFazio's office, worried there was a conspiracy buried in the classified portion of a White House plan for operating the government after a terrorist attack.
 
As a member of the U.S. House on the Homeland Security Committee, DeFazio, D-Ore., is permitted to enter a secure "bubbleroom" in the Capitol and examine classified material. So he asked the White House to see the secret documents.
 
On Wednesday, DeFazio got his answer: DENIED.
 
"I just can't believe they're going to deny a member of Congress the right of reviewing how they plan to conduct the government of the United States after a significant terrorist attack," DeFazio says.
 
Homeland Security Committee staffers told his office that the White House initially approved his request, but it was later quashed. DeFazio doesn't know who did it or why.
 
"We're talking about the continuity of the government of the United States of America," DeFazio says. "I would think that would be relevant to any member of Congress, let alone a member of the Homeland Security Committee."
 
Bush administration spokesman Trey Bohn declined to say why DeFazio was denied access: "We do not comment through the press on the process that this access entails. It is important to keep in mind that much of the information related to the continuity of government is highly sensitive."
 
Norm Ornstein, a legal scholar who studies government continuity at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said he "cannot think of one good reason" to deny access to a member of Congress who serves on the Homeland Security Committee.
 
"I find it inexplicable and probably reflective of the usual, knee-jerk overextension of executive power that we see from this White House," Ornstein said.
 
This is the first time DeFazio has been denied access to documents. DeFazio has asked Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., to help him access the documents.
 
"Maybe the people who think there's a conspiracy out there are right," DeFazio said.


For related news see: link

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
Henri Poole
Henri Poole
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 18:58 on July 23rd, 2007

jamaen, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Brian A Kennedy
Brian A Kennedy
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 04:34 on July 24th, 2007

jamaen, thanks for posting this.

mtippett
mtippett
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 07:43 on July 24th, 2007

jamaen, that is pretty shocking.

0
phillipnyc

Thanks for posting. Every American should be concerned about these issues you so rarely see on mainstream news media.

0
everchanging

Thanks for bring this information to the public, it is an issue that (I believe) most American citizen think it is not possible, but often a fear! Little do they know or want to know about how dangerous this administration is and for those that do see what is happening, we can not do enough to bring it to the public attention, fast enough.

I have thought for a long time that we may not have elections in 2008 because of this possibility (martial law stops elections), now it is a cold reality that is even more scarier then some of our homeland security issues (like a gut feeling), considering that they will only be a tool to enforce what seems inevitable with this administration.

Like Phillipnyc stated where is the mainstream media and their ability to bring matters to the forefront of public attention. We as a public do not need candy coated news or sports when our own nations Sovereignty is at stake and dying.

WHY, when and where did the media start sticking there head in the sand? (open to answers, anyone please!)

This is like gang green and can not be ignored and will not just go away without attention and care.

Side note: I do believe I still have the right to express option of free speech or has been place in some bill without congresses awareness too.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

deleted_user_85309
First Flagged at 6:56 PM, Jul 23, 2007 by deleted_user_85309
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from