NP Rank:
McCain: Homosexuals risk harming America's military
I suppose freedom and liberty in America only extends itself to heterosexuals. Even those willing to serve in America's blood-for-oil wars. This man should be ashamed of himself. This is not leadership.
- The Angryindian
------------------------------------
From Intelligentaindiena:
I suspect it’s difficult for supporters of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” to come up with a rationale for their position. Take John McCain, for example.
In an April 16 letter to Servicemembers Legal Defense
Network (SLDN), McCain says the law, passed in 1993, “unambiguously
maintains that open homosexuality within the military services presents
an intolerable risk to morale, cohesion and discipline.” Senator McCain
goes on to incorrectly assert that the U.S. Supreme Court “has ruled
that the military may constitutionally discharge a service member for
overt homosexual behavior.” […]“Most importantly, the national security of the United States, not
to mention the lives of our men and women in uniform, are put at grave
risk by policies detrimental to the good order and discipline which so
distinguish America’s Armed Services.”
This is breathtakingly dumb and is the latest evidence of just how far McCain has slipped into “crazy base world.”
First, McCain cites a Supreme Court ruling that doesn’t exist.
Strike one. Second, McCain calls gays an “intolerable risk” to military
morale, cohesion, and discipline. Really? According to a recent Zogby
poll of active personnel, 73% of military members say they are comfortable
around lesbians and gays. For that matter, more than one in five U.S.
troops already knows a gay person in their unit, including combat
units. So where’s the “intolerable risk”? Strike two.
Third, McCain emphasizes “national security” as a rationalization
for discrimination. In what way, exactly, does it improve our national
security for, say, Bleu Copas, a decorated sergeant and Arabic language
specialist who joined the Army after the 9/11 attacks, to be thrown out
of the military for being gay, despite his role in helping translate
intercepted messages from possible terrorists? Are we more or less safe
with Copas as a civilian? Strike three.




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
at 15:21 on May 4th, 2007
Good story Angry, As for McCain, What a load of crap, I cannot believe in this day and age someone who was respected by myself as most ex military held him in high regard now see the ugly side of him. Totally unbelievable and unacceptable.
at 03:53 on May 5th, 2007
angryindian, good stuff.
at 13:58 on May 5th, 2007
I have to respect McCain's valor and courage, as a serviceman.
Alan Turing, probably did more to end World War II, in Europe, than any other civilian, who was not a
Politician.
Some decorated Second World War Vets, have shown up at gay parades.
at 21:00 on June 3rd, 2008
what in the world are you talking about? mccain didnt mis-cite anything. 1993, dont ask dont tell policy. do some research but writing these ridiculous uninformed anti republican posts. I dont even support mccain, but this page is so academically dishonest it astounds me.
Pub.L. 103-160 >TITLE 10 > Subtitle A > PART II > CHAPTER 37 > § 654
(15) The presence in the armed forces of persons who demonstrate a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of military capability
Keep in mind, I love the uneducated emotional panderings of anti-bush pro-public opinion with little if any investigative research as much as the next guy, but before some unfortunate readers of this post go on to incorrectly assert this as evidence of his mistake maybe you should go on record saying your just looking for attention.
Or just make your next post about how OBAMA IS A MOSLEM: how no evidence makes people question the character of a good-intentioned man!
p/s If there is no policy like this that is seen as so viable to military sentiment, then why are there currently bills in the House to repeal this "dont ask dont tell" policy