Every Major U.S. Bank Was Profitable Last Year

by slenderdog | January 23, 2008 at 01:03 am
318 views | 0 Recommendations | 0 comments
With all the large writedowns and losses announced for the fourth quarter, hardly any attention is being paid to just how profitable U.S. banks really are.
 
That inattention has raised unnecessary concerns that the banks may be so crippled by losses that they will cut lending to the point it might undermine the U.S. economy.
 
Some commentators have said the banks are in the worst shape since the Great Depression. That isn't close to being correct.
 
Other analysts have raised the specter of the stagnant Japanese economy of the 1990s, when banks there were crippled by huge losses when a real estate price bubble burst at the beginning of that decade. This comparison also is off base.
 
Even Citigroup Inc., by far the hardest hit of the big U.S. banks by subprime-related problems, earned $3.62 billion last year. That was with a $9.83 billion fourth-quarter net loss and more than $22 billion in writedowns and additions to loan-loss reserves.
 
For JPMorgan Chase & Co., the third-biggest U.S. bank, the focus was on the 34 percent drop in fourth-quarter profits from a year earlier. Its full-year $15.4 billion profit, a record, was largely ignored. So were the bank's record annual revenue of $71.4 billion and its record earnings per share of $4.38.

After the Federal Reserve Board cut interest rates by 75 basis points yesterday we might wonder: why the panic?  Could they not wait a week?  John Berry observes here that though the banks have written off billions, they are still earning profits.  We would observe that in this world of instantaneous news, every twitch in the markets is magnified.  Doubtless the banks have lost billions, but it's not the end of the world.  Yet.

Advertisement

Comments (0)

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from