is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
The argument that pro-gun people like to make is that the more people have guns, the safer we all are because if everybody is packing, nobody would dare try anything.
But a new study from the Harvard School of Public Health puts a big, hollow-tipped bullet hole in that argument:
"Our findings suggest that in the United States, household firearms may be an important source of guns used to kill children, women and men, both on the street and in their homes," said Matthew Miller, assistant professor of health policy and injury prevention, who led the study.
His team used data from a U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention survey of 200,000 people in all 50 states.
After dividing the states into four groups based on how many households had guns, the researchers found the states in the highest quartile of firearm ownership had overall homicide rates 60 percent higher than states in the lowest quartile.
In states with the most guns, firearm homicide rates were 114 percent higher, the researchers reported in the February issue of Social Science and Medicine.
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 20:44 on January 11th, 2007
If you want to give up your guns, Dave, then go ahead. Just stay the hell away from mine.
at 21:37 on January 11th, 2007
Sure, nuke. And if you want to shoot yourself, go ahead. Just don't shoot other people.
at 21:41 on January 11th, 2007
Only in defense of life and property.
at 00:03 on January 12th, 2007
9-11 didn't change everything, but it certainly turned some people into frightened, paranoid little kittens. Apparently a gun makes them feel less weak and helpless against vague, shadowy phantoms and "furriners." The keyword there is "feel."
at 00:04 on January 12th, 2007
(Accidental duplicate post deleted.)