NP Rank:
MoveOn.org Calls Petraeus a Traitor
"Pot calling the kettle black"?
Today--as General David Petraeus provides his Iraq assessment to Congress--the antiwar group MoveOn.org is running a full-page advertisement in the New York Times under the headline: "General Petraeus or General Betray us? Cooking the books for the White House."Let's be clear: MoveOn.org is suggesting that General Petraeus has 'betrayed' his country. This is disgusting. To attack as a traitor an American general commanding forces in war because his 'on the ground' experience does not align with MoveOn.org's political objectives is utterly shameful. It shows contempt for America's military leadership, as well as for the troops who have confidence in him, as our fellow soldiers in Iraq certainly do.
General Petraeus has served this country for over 35 years with honor, distinction, and integrity. And this is not just about General Petraeus. After all, if General Petraeus is "cooking the books," then the entire military chain of command in Baghdad, and all the staff, military and civilian, who have been working with General Petraeus are complicit, since Petraeus did not write his report in isolation. They are all, apparently, 'betray[ing] us.'
MoveOn.org has been working closely with the Democratic congressional leadership --as an article in today's Sunday New York Times Magazine makes clear. And consider this comment by a Democratic senator from Friday's Politico: "'No one wants to call [Petraeus] a liar on national TV,' noted one Democratic senator, who spoke on the condition on anonymity. 'The expectation is that the outside groups will do this for us.'
So, veterans who served in Iraq ask the Democratic leaders in Congress: Does MoveOn.org speak for you? Do you agree with MoveOn.org? Or do you repudiate this despicable charge?
MoveOn.org has helped frame the core choice: Whom do we trust to run this war--MoveOn.org and its allies in Congress, or Gen. David Petraeus and his colleagues?
News Tools
September 10, 2007 at 08:05 am by gmony714, 523 views, 4 comments




Add a comment
Comments (4)
at 08:48 on September 10th, 2007
gmony714, good stuff. I find it amazing how the word "traitor" is being slung around from some venues.
at 14:40 on September 10th, 2007
Yawn! This isn't "News"
Rhetoric is a way of life for both sides! Look at how much got slung around by the Weekly Standard in this "article".
By the quality of the writing and the volume of mud-slinging I would call this publication the Weakly Sub-Standard. :D
at 15:37 on September 10th, 2007
Seems like 'cooking the books' would get one labelled an embezzler, not a traitor. I think this is sad shift of focus that moves the attention away from the actual decision makers in office in the United States to the implementors in the field. I think it is a bad move on behalf of moveon. While personally my politics have aligned with theirs on quite a few occasions, they seem to be losing direction and moving to secondary targets when their primary focus fails. The shifting position is something I don't like in the organization.
at 16:45 on September 10th, 2007
I agree, and potty mouthed name calling and character assassination as a methodology for conducting the nations business is a sad state of affairs as well.