NP Rank:
Nightmare at Reagan National Airport: A Security Story to End all Security Stories
UPDATE: TSA has posted a video in the incident on their website. You can read more about this video, the TSA incident report, and the incident itself HERE.
If you travel enough, you've seen it all -- and possibly some of the awful things that can happen while traveling will have actually happened to you. But nothing I've read about or experienced comes close to what Monica Emmerson experienced while at Reagan National Airport on June 11th while traveling with her 19-month-old toddler. This isn't one of those Catch-22 bureaucratic snafus; this isn't about rules being applied to the letter. This story is mostly about what can happen simply because the authorities in charge decide that they're going to exercise their authority because they can, regardless of whether it's legal or right or makes any sense at all.
And if this can happen to a former law enforcement officer with the United States Secret Service, it can happen to anyone.
The incident started when Monica, who left the Secret Service to raise a family, was stopped while going through airport security because there was water in her son's sippy cup. The sippy cup was seized by TSA. Monica wanted the cup back because the sippy cup was the only way her son would drink -- and it was a long flight between Washington, DC and Reno, Nevada where she was going for a family reunion. If you've ever had a toddler you understand about sippy cups.
So she was willing to spill the water out. Drink the water. Anything -- all that she wanted was to be able to have a cup that her 19-month-old toddler could drink from.
Here's what happened in Monica's words:
"I demanded to speak to a TSA [Transportation Security Administration] supervisor who asked me if the water in the sippy cup was 'nursery water or other bottled water.' I explained that the sippy cup water was filtered tap water. The sippy cup was seized as my son was pointing and crying for his cup. I asked if I could drink the water to get the cup back, and was advised that I would have to leave security and come back through with an empty cup in order to retain the cup. As I was escorted out of security by TSA and a police officer, I unscrewed the cup to drink the water, which accidentally spilled because I was so upset with the situation.
"At this point, I was detained against my will by the police officer and threatened to be arrested for endangering other passengers with the spilled 3 to 4 ounces of water. I was ordered to clean the water, so I got on my hands and knees while my son sat in his stroller with no shoes on since they were also screened and I had no time to put them back on his feet. I asked to call back my fiancé, who I could still see from afar, waiting for us to clear security, to watch my son while I was being detained, and the officer threatened to arrest me if I moved. So I yelled past security to get the attention of my fiancé.
"I was ordered to apologize for the spilled water, and again threatened with arrest. I was threatened several times with arrest while detained, and while three other police officers were called to the scene of the mother with the 19 month old. A total of four police officers and three TSA officers reported to the scene where I was being held against my will. I was also told that I should not disrespect the officer and could be arrested for this too. I apologized to the officer and she continued to detain me despite me telling her that I would miss my flight. The officer advised me that I should have thought about this before I 'intentionally spilled the water!'"
Monica said that the incident ended this way: "I missed my flight, needless to say after being detained for over 40 minutes. After the officer was done humiliating me, I was advised that I could go through the security check point in an attempt to catch my flight. The officer insisted that my son and I be rescreened despite us both being detained and under her control the entire time."
During the weeks and months after 9/11 some passengers who were caught with unidentified fluids while going through airport security were told to drink the liquid (including breast milk) to prove that it wasn't an explosive. In one incident, a fourteen year old boy was ordered to drink water that he was carrying, and it turned out that this was unclean pond water he was carrying for a science project. Monica was more than happy to drink her child's tap water --all three or four ounces of it-- and tried, in fact. But it was the trying and spilling that seems to have escalated this into a situation that required the presence of four TSA officers and three police officers.
TSA found no other security problems with Monica Emmerson. Not even a nail clipper. Just the water and the sippy cup.
TSA's rules allow passengers to take up to three ounces of liquid on board; they also allow parents to take milk or baby formula on board in larger quantities than that, if declared to TSA. But the question that she was asked by TSA --was this "nursery water" in the sippy cup?-- was an unanswerable one, since there's no such thing as nursery water in the TSA regulations, and it's not a generic term.
Monica Emmerson was detained for 45 minutes. She wasn't questioned about possible ties to terrorists. Her carry-on items weren't rigorously searched -- or even searched again. Neither the police nor TSA took any action that indicated that they throught she might be a security risk. She was just detained, harassed and threatened with arrest. All because of a sippy cup with water in it.
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
Bill Adler
Washington, District Of Columbia, United States -
paolonutuni
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Recommendations (86)

Anonymous users (15)







Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (201)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
kazvorpalat 14:43 on June 18th, 2007
The "soft" americans are the cowards who are willing to tolerate bureaucratic thugs abusing their authority at airports...or anywhere else...on the idiotic premise that it'll make them FEEL safer. Even aside from how none of these police state measures would have done ANYTHING to stop the 9-11 incident that has turned so many people into timorous little mice.
Anyone who does NOT tolerate such nitwittery is certainly more couragous, even if they're doing it out of some selfish sense that they should get special treatment for being a former bureaucrat, themselves.
We should ALL react to abuse of authority that way. If we did, the abuse would rapidly come to an end, as WE are the productive ones, and THEY are the heavily outnumbered leeches on society.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
boyhowdyat 05:46 on June 18th, 2007
Good example of the hyperventilating "I'm being oppressed" attitude. What is "essentially strip searched"? Is is like being handed paper towels to clean up your spill is "essentially waterboarded by TSA"? Perhaps the situation with your sister truly was unneccesarily over-done, but in my reading, "essentially strip searched" means she wasn't strip searched at all. Either she was stripped of her clothes or she wasn't.
I hope Monica is being interviewed by the Secret Service to find out if she does still have a badge (should have turned it in at end of employment) and if she attempted to use her (former) status for her gain. I hope her husband (if there is one) is okay now and in the future. Imagine being married to such a spiteful liar.
at 13:59 on June 13th, 2007
What is nursery water anyways? Pretty cruel stuff, especially when the little boy was crying to get his sippy cup back...
- Sign In or Join to post comments
willemat 16:59 on June 17th, 2007
Yes, the "needs" of toddlers should be placed before the regulations that all travelers have to follow. Yet another case of people with children placing their children's needs before the needs of all others. Bottom line, none of this would have happened if she had followed the rules for flying.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
kazvorpalat 14:08 on June 18th, 2007
No, the bottom line is that the rules are idiotic, would not have stopped a single actual incident that has happened, and are the result of a bunch of sociopaths running things, more concerned with their own power than with what is just or right for everyone.
One could not sanely conclude that this woman DRINKING her toddler's water could POSSIBLY pose a threat to ANYONE.
The TSA thugs involved should be prosecuted.
Realistically, ANY time government authority is abused, the bureaucrats involved should be prosecuted to the farthest extent of what their victims could possibly have been charged with.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Kp (not verified)at 04:23 on November 29th, 2008
Bottom line is none of this would have happened if the "authorities" had any sense.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
mystic tinkerbellat 09:22 on June 21st, 2007
Any SMART person with a baby or children knows what nursery or baby water is. It's special water with fluoride in it. Although nursery water is not mentioned on the permitted liquids list, it is up to the airport FSD or the checkpoint supervisor whether or not to allow the water through or not. Most of the time it is allowed simply because the gift shops or any other shops inside the secure area of the airport do not sell it. That's why she was asked if it was nursery water.
at 14:01 on June 13th, 2007
Thanks Bill...my sister has a nightmarish situation every single time she travels with my nephew...it's sad this happened.
at 14:36 on June 13th, 2007
That folks like this, with virtually no demonstrable ability to deal with the public, are in such a position of power (effectively controlling the mobility of anyone crossing their path) puts the lie to all those breathless rationales of "making [us] safer". Time-wasting and humiliating "stupid security" such as this is nothing short of a national embarassment.
at 15:36 on June 13th, 2007
Thanks for this Bill.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Jennifer Novakat 03:17 on June 14th, 2007
Bill, Wow! what a story. It makes you think there is no humanity left in the world.
at 03:36 on June 14th, 2007
What can I say? Unbelievable! Thanks for posting, Bill Adler!
at 05:02 on June 14th, 2007
Bill Adler, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 10:46 on June 14th, 2007
While I understand that we do not have any comments here to illustrate the other side of the story, let's be honest... it's a sippy cup and there's precedent for asking (ordering) people to drink the liquid they want to carry through.
It sounds to me like the initial officer was having a rough day justifying her first response, and instead of being rational and moving towards reason, she got defensive and soon everyone was out of sorts ... I didn't miss the comment about 'disrespecting the officer'...
What a web has been woven.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
xwabbitat 11:25 on June 14th, 2007
This is outrageous. Why mess with a defenseless
woman and an innocent child?! ... The funny but true thing - the officer in
question who harassed them and abused her "power" is a woman. PMS? Early
menopause? Pure evil? ... shouldn't she be inclined to feel sympathetic for
Monica and her kid?! Absolutely ridiculous.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
blufx1963at 00:36 on June 17th, 2007
Why can't she stop for a minute too, and see what's up? She keeps going and going with the sippy cup........
at 11:25 on June 14th, 2007
Bill Adler, I'm not surprised by this at all. I fly 6-12 times year and almost every time I'm going through security (especially in toronto and the states) there is someone being thuroughly searched, I frequently later see the victim rushing to their gate. It's a shame what power and fear have done to a routine security system. Good stuff.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
phlavorat 12:01 on June 14th, 2007
Even without going into how ridiculous and unnecessary the entire TSA liquid screening process is, I have to say that the abuse of power that the police showed in this situation is representative of the state of the nation. It has become a daily occurrence for me to read an instance of police stepping over the line. I've seen video of police searching cars with no warrant or probable cause when the driver implicantly told them not too. I've seen stories of people arrested for "illegal surveillance" for video taping a traffic stop. I love what our country stood for before the Bill of Rights was thrown out with the signing of the Patriot Act. But, sadly, those days are gone. Anyone remember when police used to have the motto, "To serve and protect" on the side of their cars? Well they scraped it off in the late 80's and it's not coming back.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
foobaat 12:10 on June 14th, 2007
I think it's time for another Tea Party- everyone should peacefully protest this tyrannical behavior and bring through security a bottle of plain old iced tea...
- Sign In or Join to post comments
blufx1963at 01:48 on June 17th, 2007
Oh what a nut you are!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
jimmat 11:23 on June 17th, 2007
Lousy journalism. Now who was abusing their police power? The TSA or the former Secret Service officer???
Professionalism: TSA 1, Secret Service 0
- Sign In or Join to post comments
whoo_whooat 12:23 on June 14th, 2007
Myself having to deal with TSA with an 8 year old and a 9
month year old, I sympathize with this poor lady, and it really makes my blood
boil on how stupid this whole public security apparatus is. I get screened
constantly in airports, courthouses, anywhere where official business is done
on the state and federal level -- screened for a possible "terrorist threat"
which is mostly non-existent and thrives only in the imagination of petty moronic
security bureaucrats who thrive on this kind of punitive BS. We have definitely
lost our way.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
blue Rayneat 12:29 on June 14th, 2007
This story shows how a bad idea has progressed to the point that all the TSA and the police goons associated with them are doing is forcing the submission that the TSA's security theatre was designed to bring about.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
blufx1963at 00:53 on June 17th, 2007
Your point being?????
- Sign In or Join to post comments
fatcat1111at 12:47 on June 14th, 2007
On a related note, flying back from my parent's this winter, TSA goons removed from my five-year-old daughter's backpack a snowglobe, presented to her as a Christmas gift from her grandparents, and threw it away, right in front of her, telling her (not me!) that it could be used to make a bomb. Of course she was histerical. She still talks about this, asking me why somebody would do that to her and why didn't I do something about it.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Traveler1464at 17:09 on June 16th, 2007
You could have done something about it. If you had checked list of prohibited items for carry-on you would have known that snowglobes must be in your checked luggage. That's your responsibility as a traveler. Though I agree her being told directly it could be used to make a bomb was absolutely unnecessary.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
davidcat 06:13 on June 19th, 2007
Please describe how a bomb can be constituted in air with liquids. It can't be done. It is beyond comprehenson that you would justify the actions of these government thugs.
Imagine, if they were just telling you it was necessary to take a shower with 100 other people in a closely packed room without water drains. You would willing go just as 6 million others did.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
blufx1963at 00:38 on June 17th, 2007
Ok, you have yourself to blame.... What part of "NO LIQUIDS" do you not understand? Shame!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
maxcee72at 00:54 on June 18th, 2007
I wouldn't have wanted to put it in the checked luggage either since they smash it around and steal you blind. Don't say they don't either, because I have many friends that work for the airlines who have told me that this goes on on a regular basis. When they look through your baggage, if there is anything of value in there, they will take it. That's just another reason why I don't hardly fly anywhere that I can drive anymore. It's just not worth the hassle.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
mystic tinkerbellat 21:13 on June 19th, 2007
Airline employees admitted to you that they steal stuff out of people's bags? Wow, how is it that you continue to trust these "friends" of yours? FYI, TSA only checks the bags, it's the airline rampers who load your bags onto the plane & are the ones who throw your bags around. Oh & from what I've heard, placing fragile stickers or notices all over your bag makes it even more of a target for tossing.