NP Rank:
Gonzales Resigns as Attorney General
UPDATE: AP's got a great collection of initial reactions:
[q
url="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/gonzales_quotes;_ylt=AiTLFg05yqrUFLmDKO_zXtOs0NUE"]"Alberto
Gonzales was never the right man for this job. He lacked independence,
he lacked judgment, and he lacked the spine to say no to Karl Rove.
This resignation is not the end of the story. Congress must get to the
bottom of this mess and follow the facts where they lead, into the
White House." — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.
___
"I
thank Alberto Gonzales for his public service and wish him well in his
future endeavors. It is my hope that whomever President Bush selects as
the next attorney general, he or she is not subjected to the same
poisonous partisanship that we've sadly grown accustomed to over the
past eight months." — Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.
___
"It
has been a long and difficult struggle but at last, the attorney
general has done the right thing and stepped down." _Sen. Charles
Schumer, D-N.Y.
___
"The life of Alberto Gonzales has
been defined by his devotion to family and deep commitment to public
service. ... I appreciate his hard work in defense of our country and
look forward to his future contributions." — House Republican Whip Roy
Blunt.
___
"As we wish Mr. Gonzales the best in his
departure, we should also take a moment to welcome Paul Clement as his
interim replacement at the Department of Justice. As a former counsel
to Sen. John Ashcroft, Paul has proven himself over the years to be in
possession of a sophisticated and thoughtful legal mind. And as the
current solicitor general of the United States, he knows what it takes
to be an effective advocate on behalf of the people of this country. "
___
The
Justice Department under Gonzales "suffered a severe crisis of
leadership that allowed our justice system to be corrupted by political
influence." Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.
___
"It
is a sad day when the attorney general of the United States resigns
amid a cloud of suspicion that the system of justice has been
manipulated for political purposes. More than accountability, we need
answers. ....If the power of the prosecutor has been misused in the
name of partisanship, we deserve a full airing of the facts." — Rep.
John Conyers, D-Mich., House Judiciary chairman.
___
"He
has exhibited a lack of candor with Congress and the American people
and a disdain for the rule of law and our constitutional system. I
strongly urge President Bush to nominate a new attorney general who
will respect our laws and restore the integrity of the office." — Sen.
Edward Kennedy, D-Mass.
___
"Long overdue. The president
must nominate an attorney general who is a lawyer for the American
people, not a political arm of the White House." — New Mexico governor
and Democratic presidential candidate Bill Richardson.
___
"Better late than never." — Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards.
___
"It's
about time ... Gonzales now joins a long list of Republican officials
resigning under a cloud of scandal, but these resignations cannot purge
the Bush administration of its problems. The true problem rests with
the Bush White House itself, which continues to put what's best for the
Republican Party ahead of what's best for America." — Democratic
National Committee Chairman Howard Dean.[/q]
And they're dropping like flies... can't really say I'll miss this one. But why's he leaving now? Post your thoughts on this -- or anything else Gonzalian -- in the Comments section below. Invective, story updates, blog links, you name it! Consider this story opened up.
WACO, Tex., Aug. 27 — Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, whose tenure has been marred by controversy and accusations of perjury before Congress, has resigned. A senior administration official said he would announce the decision later this morning in Washington.
And the politico-bloggers are starting to ask the exact same question. From TPMCafe:
[q
url="http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2007/aug/27/fredo_open_thread"]Fredo
has finally gone fishing. The "why?" is fairly obvious. The "why
now?" is frankly baffling to me. One of my colleagues compared it to
Rumsfeld's departure, saying "after they'd completely lost credibility
and all hope of regaining it... only then does the person in question
go."[/q]
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
djbatman
Pescara, Italy -
SthPacific
Kavieng, New Ireland, Norfolk Island







Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (12)
at 04:30 on August 27th, 2007
Brian A Kennedy, thanks for getting this story out so quickly. It will now show up on the home page for four hours. If new developments justify it, I'll renew this flag for another cycle.
at 06:05 on August 27th, 2007
Brian A Kennedy, excellent job in getting this to us. I like the balance between MSM and a blog, too.
at 06:16 on August 27th, 2007
Thanks, Brian. He left because he became expendable to Bush and Co. He lied so many times and in so many different circumstances it was just a matter of time. Expect neo-cons to spin this as a decisive victory for Republican policy.
at 06:18 on August 27th, 2007
I think this is an important story and would benefit from other NowPublic contributors working on it. I've flagged it as News Wanted and invite others in relevant locations to look for more evidence.
at 06:21 on August 27th, 2007
From DailyKos, below. The National Review is prepping a roundup too, should be pretty interesting.
A replacement hasn't been named, but we'll soon find out if the rumors
about Michael Chertoff are true.
UPDATE: Can Bush make a recess
appointment? Yes. Would it break the deal he supposedly had with Harry
Reid? Probably. (Who knows whether there was "extraordinary
circumstances" escape clause?) What would it take to prevent such an
appointment? One or two Senators (or Representatives -- this can be
done in the House correction: a pro forma session of the House takes
"Congress" out of recess, but to prevent recess appointments, the
Constitution specifies the Senate must be in session, which makes
sense, since it's the Senate that handles appointments) coming in to
open a pro forma session. [Kagro X]
at 06:35 on August 27th, 2007
In March, Hillary Clinton's campaign put out a call for a petition drive demanding that Gonzales step down.
Question: will Hillary claim credit, at least in part, for his resignation?
at 06:37 on August 27th, 2007
And from Wonkette:
In one final display of hilarious ineptitude, Attorney General
Alberto Gonzales resigned on a Friday afternoon, the traditional home
of the unwelcome newsdump, and then waited until a Monday morning to
announce it. Way to go, Fredo — you will be missed!
Lord only knows who will replace Gonzo, but we’re thinking probably
the ghost of Al Capone or something. The confirmation hearings ought to
be a zoo no matter who they pick. Harriet Miers maybe?
Even until the bitter end, Gonzo was lying about every goddamn thing he could:
That’s his own spokesman he lied to. For no discernible
reason at all. The man lies about what he wants for breakfast in the
morning. He tells his dog she’s good but doesn’t mean it.
Anyway, Democrats won, hooray, and all they had to do to win the
resignation of a criminal they should’ve impeached was agree to sign
away all of our rights in a wiretapping bill that they were angry with
Fredo for illegally trying to enforce in the first place. Shit, is it
Labor Day yet?
at 06:40 on August 27th, 2007
On Saturday, Mother Jones lofted this ball into the air, quoted from Paul Bedard of U.S. News: Gonzales would resign and be replaced by Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff.
Wouldn't that be a bit like setting the fox loose to guard the henhouse? Given the problems the Bush administration is facing with protests over Homeland Security privacy concerns, putting Chertoff in as the top guy to handle America's legal issues--that would be a blatant abuse of power, IMHO.
at 06:43 on August 27th, 2007
The fix may be in: CNN is reporting administration sources who say Chertoff will get the position.
at 06:47 on August 27th, 2007
Thanks, PEP -- well, Chertoff's been Assistant Attorney General before (at least Wikipedia says so), so it makes sense in theory at least.
at 07:22 on August 27th, 2007
Alberto Gonzalez is not a victory for anyone. He is a victim of the left and right. Both sides are playing a game of who's career can we destroy next. But this time they went after a Latino who was not prepared for the scum in Washington on both sides. if he commited any crimes I say PROVE IT!! This is a sad day for politics when the right who put him in that position and the left who took it away both should feel like the pieces of shit they are. Those attorney's he fired were political appointments Clinton fired all of the Bush Attorneys when he got into office.I think it was 93. And what do you think will change at DOJ Cheney probably runs that dept. too
payback is a bitch and the Dems had better hope one of theirs isn't next.
at 13:59 on August 27th, 2007
Brian A Kennedy, I like this story. It's good stuff.
Also Breaking Brian. Laura Deserts George on APEC meeting. She says she has a sore Back
LOL Looks like its just GW and Cheney now. The last of the Neo-Liberals. Little Johnny Howard will be gone before the end of the year too :)