NP Rank:
20,000lb Spy Satellite - Plummeting Uncontrolled to Earth
by Swan | January 29, 2008 at 07:54 am
1546 views | 36 Recommendations | 10 comments
I don't know about you, but I plan on keeping a watchful eye toward the heavens, and an ear on the radio over the next few weeks. Coming out of Washington today, Associated Press is reporting that yet another satellite has "died" and is now falling towards Earth.
I feel like I'm in a Bruce Willis movie and Gary Sinise is bound to appear soon.
A satellite dies when power is lost and this one is projected to fall some time in late February or early March.
(Please Note: the images to the right are not of this satellite - I
haven't been able to find any photographs of the current satellite and
it's position.)
The satellite, which no longer can be controlled, could contain hazardous materials, and it is unknown where on the planet it might come down, they said. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the information is classified as secret. It was not clear how long ago the satellite lost power, or under what circumstances.
Why is it that the government always thinks that the public will feel better knowing:
Appropriate government agencies are monitoring the situation.
The last time this happened, we were lucky - NASA had managed to control the satellite, which also fell out of orbit but broke up over the Persian Gulf - thousands of miles from where they expected it to land. The science satellite weighed 7,000 pounds.
They, and we, have no idea this time where the current satellite will fall - which is truly frightening.
Such an uncontrolled re-entry could risk exposure of U.S. secrets, said John Pike, a defense and intelligence expert.
Spy satellites typically are disposed of through a controlled re-entry into the ocean so that no one else can access the spacecraft, he said.
Pike who is the Director of the Defence Research Group for GlobalSecurity.org, also explained that they're unable even to shoot it down with a missile, since it would create debris and fall in multiple places all over the ground. Even more frightening, is that this satellite doesn't weigh the mere 7,000 pounds of the last one, but weighs 20,000 pounds and is the size of a bus.
Officials are attempting to downplay the event that they themselves attempted to keep from the public from knowing. They claim it will "most likely" fall into the ocean - though they have absolutely no way of knowing at this point.
We're hearing platitudes such as:
[“Given that 75 percent of the Earth is covered in water and much of the land is uninhabited, the likely percentage of this satellite or any debris falling into a populated area is very small,” - Johndroe
Another worrying point, is that the spacecraft might be carrying hazardous material. What do they mean by "might," - don't they know what's on their own spacecraft?
Pike went on to say that there "might" be beryllium on board, which is a light metal with a high melting point - possibly leading to chronic, incurable respiratory problems.
This metal is used in the defense and aerospace industries. I still want to know why they aren't sure whether it's on board or not.
It's speculated that the spacecraft is likely a photo reconnaissance satellite. These kinds of satellites have been invaluable to gather information from space - not just in being able to locate militant terror training camps, but also for locating nuclear sites and monitoring fires and other natural disasters.
Part of the information leaked to the press by four senior U.S., officials was that the satellite is:
... a classified National Reconnaissance Office spacecraft launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California in 2006
Why isn't NASA proudly waving their flag now? NASA - you screwed up - big time.
Sources:
AOL News
Re: 2002 The Extreme Ultraviolet Explorer
Fox News
NASA
MSNBC
Wikipedia
Global Security.org
United Press International
Image Source:
AOL News
Movie






Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (10)
at 09:21 on January 29th, 2008
at 09:42 on January 29th, 2008
Great story Swan. It's well-written, lively, and thorough as all get out. I actually posted this story yesterday, but yours is much better. Thanks!
at 09:47 on January 29th, 2008
Swan, at least we know that Chicken Little can be right some of the time. The really scary part of your story is the dishonesty of the "authorities".
at 10:00 on January 29th, 2008
Swan, If you are old enough: Anxiety was all across America worried that SkyLab would fall on them. I wonder if the same will be true. Those spys! We just can't keep control of them! Oh, Keeping your eyes on the heavens is quite Biblical!
at 10:19 on January 29th, 2008
Great informative story
at 10:24 on January 29th, 2008
Hello and thank you to all for the comments and flags,
Rob: Woops! Sorry I must have missed your report!
Barbara: I'm sure you're not surprised that NASA et al were trying to keep the story a secret. They can't really afford to be known as the fumblers that they've been called in the past. It's not the first time they've had to wear the mantle of embarrassment over something they've done - or forgot to do.
Polisite: Yes I'm old enough (thanks for making me admit that - Grrrrrrr! ;) The difference between Skylab and the current satellite, is that they at least had control and were able to adjust its attitude for optimal re-entry dynamics. Even then, large debris was found all over Western Australia and the Indian Ocean.
This time they have NO control
Just as a point of interest - the San Francisco Examiner offered $10,000 to anyone who could bring them a piece of Skylab. A 17 year old boy hopped the next plane, taking with him several pieces that had landed on his roof in Esperance, Australia. He was one happy boy!
~ Swan
at 11:48 on January 29th, 2008
Swan, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 12:21 on January 29th, 2008
Swan, I like this story. GREAT INFO!! i wish I had posted it first.
at 12:46 on January 29th, 2008
Hello Rob and Mountaineer,
Thank you for the flags and comments.
Hey Mountaineer ... ;P
~ Swan
at 12:49 on January 29th, 2008
HA!!