NP Rank:
Army Corrupt: Secretly Changes Soldiers' Health Profiles to Return Them to Battle
What can one say about an army that routinely changes the medical profiles of injured soldiers, so that they can be redeployed back into battle sooner than they should?
What can one say about an army that prescribes and dispenses addictive pain-killing drugs to these soldiers, to keep them there?
"I took Percocet, and I also took Vicodin,"
Amy Staff Sgt., Jack Auble suffers with severe spinal osteoporosis; bulging discs and compression fractures. This caused him to have what the army terms as a "permanent profile," which in army lingo means - not only that he didn't meet the army's retention standards, but it was also a confirmation that his condition had plateaued and would not improve.
Then what would you say, if the army (our army - the USA., army, those we're supposed to trust,) merrily went along their way and took this man along with them - because they decided to alter his medical profile saying that he had fewer restrictions than he really had.
Oh and by the way; that wasn't even as a result of a further medical examination prior to redeployment:
He said he was not re-examined by a medical professional at Fort Drum, N.Y., before receiving a new profile.
Now "the fat lady sings:"
Auble's medical paperwork was changed. He received a new, "temporary" status, used to indicate his condition would improve, and he was redeployed.
So I do hope a soldier (of any rank) who decides to comment here, would not insult my intelligence by trying to tell me that by way of explanation.
Unsurprisingly:
Col. James Terrio, Fort Carson's deputy commander of clinical services, said he knew of no profiles that were changed at the post without a soldier seeing a medical professional.
But some say the military is stretched so thin and under pressure to meet deployment goals that it sends into war zones injured soldiers who wouldn't be there otherwise.
"We have been having issues with reaching deployable strength, and thus have been taking along some borderline soldiers who we would otherwise have left behind for continued treatment."
A Fort Carson soldier with a shoulder injury, who asked not to be identified, said his profile was rewritten days before he deployed.
He said his original profile stated he was not permitted to carry a weapon or a rucksack or wear body armor.
Fort Carson sent 79 injured soldiers with the 3rd Brigade Combat Team to the Middle East in November and December to perform light-duty jobs. Most were sent to Iraq. Six of them have since returned.
If you're pregnant and you're the kind that looks to the future - is this not something that would make you potentially fearful for your child if he/she eventually chooses the army?
Now we have army corruption that harms its own soldiers - or was I just blind to it happening beforehand?
I do welcome comments, positive or negative.
~ Swan
Sources:
Denver Post by Erin Emery
Veterans for America by Erin Emery
Image Sources
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
Swan
Hillsboro, Oregon, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (22)
at 12:33 on February 1st, 2008
Swan, I like this story. It's good stuff. It's amazing how the Army would even allow such actions against troops with disabling injuries. Hopefully a Congressional inquiry will ensue with Erin Emery's informative and shocking news report. God Bless the Troops overseas.
at 12:42 on February 1st, 2008
Hello Watermon,
Thank you for your comments and the flag. :)
I was horrified to hear that this had been done so many times. I checked the GoArmy web site, to see if they had reported on it, but naturally it didn't appear there. One can only hope that the inquiry will flush out these irresponsible doctors who send our boys back into battle on crutches and addictive pain killers.
I'm really very angry about this story and what it means for our soldiers. Thanks again Watermon.
~Swan
at 13:17 on February 1st, 2008
Swan, a well sourced and interesting story about an important matter. Thank you for posting.
at 15:41 on February 1st, 2008
Hello Ryan,
Thank your for your comment and flag. I keep wondering about what the military are going to do cover this up. They must really be sweating it now that it's leaked to the media.
If anything, I think their doctors or the ones that ordered them to do it should be charged with putting these soldiers in danger, when they were not physically capable of protecting themselves.
We don't even have statistics yet that we can refer to, to see if any of the soldiers that were sent back to the wars, died or were sent back injured worse a second time.
As I said: The army (those involved,) should be hanging their heads in abject shame.
~ Swan
at 15:10 on February 1st, 2008
Swan, back in the Vietnam era it was called a "credability gap". Thanks for reporting on it.
at 15:40 on February 1st, 2008
Hello Barbara,
Thank you for the flag and your comment. :)
I didn't exactly understand the term you mentioned. Perhaps it was because I was just a kid growing up in Australia at the time. Could you please explain a little further what you meant by a "credibility gap?"
I understand what the term means at it's root, but you mentioned the Vietnam war, so is this a term specific to the army?
~ Swan
at 16:45 on February 1st, 2008
Swan, good work
I must say though, that sadly it demonstrates that every country is just as guilty as any other of ethically and morally corrupt practices.
This places the US army right up there with the Australians and British who exposed soldiers to nuclear contamination during atom bomb testing on the 1950s, Saddam's treatment of opponents, Russia's treatment of dissadents - China, Cuba, many African nations, the list is sadly endless....
at 17:24 on February 1st, 2008
Very informative post.
When a vehicle is not prepared to move it is "deadlined". When a soldier has a profile, they are not prepared to go at 100%. The United States Army would not approve of changing paperwork to deploy a troop. If some lower official changed a profile to meet personnel needs they will be disciplined. It is important to know that some members of the Armed Forces are not following regulations.
at 19:00 on February 1st, 2008
Hello Quotato .. and welcome to Now Public, :)
Thank you for that explanation! So in essence your confirming that the boy should never have been deployed. But this is happening over and over again, surely you can't tell me that it's only perpertrated by "some lower official," and that his superiors know nothing about it.
I'm not trying to sound contentious really, I'm just in awe of that fact that you could believe that.
I agree with you absolutely, when you say:
Thanks for stopping by and commenting, ;)
~ Swan
at 12:55 on February 3rd, 2008
Swan, your research is valid and should contine without having access to every important fact available.
All large organizations are
ultimately responsible for every action (or inaction) that subordinate officials in responsible positions make. In the US, the Army is subordinate to civilian control. My belief (based on knowledge) is that it is not the "policy" of the US Army to deploy troops into a combat zone with falsified documentation.
at 16:08 on February 3rd, 2008
Hello again Quotato, and thank you for the flag, :)
I'm not sure what you mean when you say that "the Army is subordinate to civilian control."
If you could give me a better explanation, I'd be grateful. As for this being the army's policy, I'm not disagreeing with you there - but there are always illegal sales/trades and many other illegalities going on in various departments of the army that are not known by all ranks.
If you prefer to call them an "organization" - then let's say that they are not all-knowing or immune to what can secretly happen inside it's own walls.
Thank you for stopping by again, :)
~ Swan
at 23:59 on July 9th, 2008
hey my husband is on medical profile and his sgt. if making him break it and is also refusing for him to see his surgeon because he had surgery may 19 2008 and it is all messed up. isnt that against army regulation? hes knee looks like a 4 leaf clover and he has pain all over his leg.
my email is lofallinve6705@yahoo.com
please email me
at 03:15 on November 28th, 2008
i am a new soldier myself i had extended basic training and ait
i thought joining the army was something good it is corrupt
and no one listens to privates they cover everything up to make themselves look good
i am in iraq as i write this struggling with my own situations it isnt iraq for me it is the chain of command above me why because i am a god fearing good hearted person
i get locked in my room by a e5 and they say oh i forgot you were in there after the 5th time come on already
i was told i am not aloud to discuss this with anyone outside the platoon
i have had things of my destroyed and got threatened they coverd it up saying the person who said that to me ment they were going to do it to themselves but they are still aloud to carry a weapon
there is a soldier in the army who has a real bad knee had surgery twice and wasnt supposed to come to deploy well he is here
he cant lift more than 20 pounds but he is he tried to get help they threatend to throw himi in jail the sgt behind his back to every one else was stating how "they" wanted to beat that person up for not working not allowing them to even eat or go shower
this is our army and no one is doing anything about it
before i got to my first duty station i was proud to be in the army wanted to stay in for 20 years and now i just feel like i cant wait to get out already its too much to be at war alone then to have to deal with this on a daily basis and the people who hold rank over you
are the ones people listen to weather you are right or wrong it doesnt matter there is no justice
then they try to deface youand lie about you see it gets you know where but worse off not worth being in the army if you are a good person it gets you know where absolutely no where unless you go to ocs to become a captain or lt
just a private in iraq serving more than the mission
at 11:25 on December 5th, 2008
In what world do you live?
Who would a medical officer be pressured by to change a soldier's medical records? The only person would be the soldier.
You're an idiot if you think this is something that happens all the time. There are plenty of jacked up things to report about in the military, you don't need to report on something that is very rare IF a medical officer did in fact change his records. What most likely happened is he asked for the change to deploy with his unit (as they are all rather close), then he got there and decided that it was a dumb idea.
Oh and I'm sure you also delete most posts that go against you're article. Even some of your "private" and "Anonymous" posts seem like a hoax.
Look at other armies and their soldiers conditions.
kthxbye
at 15:54 on December 5th, 2008
I don't know about the "changing" of records, but my husband is going through something like this as we speak. He was injured in Iraq. He was originally diagnosed with a class 3 ACJ separation (his left shoulder) the Dr, after finding out he was soon coming home on leave, told him to take care of it here. So they just wrapped him up and put him on a profile where he could do nothing, not carry his weapon or wear his body armor. Now he is home, he's gotten re-evaluated. The new Dr has stepped it up to a class 4/possible class 5 separation, needing surgery. They've already set the surgery date, put him on a non-deployable status. All he needs is a signature from his commander allowing the surgery. It's been a week now, and we've not been able to get the signature. We've talked to everyone, the Dr has e-mailed memos about the importance of this surgery. My husband's been told that if he doesn't return to Iraq on his scheduled day, he could face disciplinary action.
Today we talked to the Division Surgeon who looked at his records and told us, that if we wait much longer on the surgery, his ligmants will be no good and will have to be replace with cadaver ligaments when they do the surgery at a later date. So he also made a phone call to try to get a signature for us. Still nothing. It makes no sense but this will not be the first time we've had issues with the Army.
The last time I wrote a letter to our local Congressman, and actually got results, but it took 2 months, this time, we don't have that much time, so ..... I'm thinking of calling the media and exposing our issue with the names of the people who are stopping my husband from getting the medical care that he needs.
at 05:44 on December 13th, 2008
Just an update, although I think no one else is reading this. Through contacts of my own, from work, I was able to get in touch with our local "Wounded Warrior" Rep, it just so happened that she is also married to a high ranking officer on the base, so she pulled some strings and a bunch of people got thier butts chewed out for dropping the ball on my husband's situation. He got his paper signed and is scheduled to have surgery next month unless they can push it up closer. He will then face about 3-6 months of physical therapy here at home and most likely will not be deploying back to Iraq before the rest of his unit is scheduled to come home.
In our experiences we find there is always a way to fix things you just have to find out who to talk to who can help you. Don't hesitate to write your congressman, it's what they got elected for. But once you do, be prepared, you have to follow through, it may take months. They have to get you to sign privacy waivers in order to investigate your case. Also be prepared for the people you are complaining about to harrass you. It happened to my husband. He was interrogated for 3 hours the last time I wrote the congressman. But in the end they are wrong for that too, you can turn around and file another complaint with IG for that. If your original complaint is legitimate you will see results, you just have to be willing to put up with the BS first. The system works if you use it right.
I don't have all the answers, I just know what we've gone through how we fixed our issues.
good luck to all!
at 06:05 on December 13th, 2008
The reason things are so difficult, whether it be with military, government or even the industries (ie reporting a problem or trying to get a refund), is because the system has to compensate for all the scammers out there in the world who try to take advantage of the very system that was put in place to help people.
I have a friend who went through many troubles to receive benefits because they are unable to work. He has had a few heart attacks, and only has 15-18% of his heart function...this is a legitimate claim.
But because of the flood of "my back hurts, my knee hurts, my neck hurts, I don't want to work any more" claims, which most fraudulent claims land in one of these categories because it is nearly impossible to dis-prove, he went through nearly 2 years of crap.
He has finally received the benefits, but not before going into financial ruin because he could not work in the meantime.
It's sad that we live in a society where so many would rather spend their time and God given talent on figuring out a way to get paid without working, instead of putting that talent to use and getting paid for all their hard work, because let's face it...there's a lot of hard work involved to scam.
at 23:34 on March 17th, 2009
Honestly, our military does not function the way it is supposed to/claims to. This is a prime example of the lies and deceit put forth by our government and its components. I ran into a situation myself where, at the usual 0630 PT formation, I was forced by my section to perform PT activities that directly violated my profile because I did not have the paper with me, despite the fact that each and every one of them knew I was on profile until the next month. If you know a soldier has a profile that is still effective, whether or not they have a copy on their person should definitely not be an issue. That can cause conditions to worsen. I have never been able to find a regulation stating this requirement. They just don't take medical needs seriously enough, especially if they're unofficially changing profiles around just to send injured soldiers overseas.
at 23:38 on March 17th, 2009
For clarification purposes: I didn't mean that my situation was a prime example, but rather the article above.
at 17:13 on March 31st, 2009
THE SAME THING IS HAPPENING AT FORT POLK TO ME AND SOME OF MY BUDDIES THERE TRYING TO DEPLOY US JUST SO SOME BODY CAN GET MORE RANK I THINK ITS ABUNCH OF HORSE**** BUT WHAT DO YOU DO.ISNT THERE AWAY WE CAN STOP THIS I GOT 2 BAD KNEES AND BACK AND THERE TELLING ME IM STILL GOING NO MATTER WHAT.MAKES ME RETHINK ABOUT THE ARMY I JOINED I FIGURED IT WAS BETTER THAN THAT BOY WAS I WRONG
at 15:14 on April 15th, 2009
I am going through the same thing currently. Had a shoulder injury and subsequent surgery. 3 days after my surgery the army physical therapist ripped out all the work they did in surgery. Been waiting around to get it looked at more in depth since february. Just found out today that the brigade surgeon (who is a physicians assistant) is writing me a new profile that makes me deployable. As per my orthopedic surgeon, I am not supposed to carry a weapon, wear body armor, carry a rucksack or prepare defensive positions. I also cannot run, do pushups or situps. We will see what kind of BS she puts on there. And I am not the only one. There are at least 10 of us in my unit that they are doing this to right now. So it happens.
at 16:13 on April 28th, 2009
I'm currently a soldier for the united states army, I have spent 8 months rehabilitating an injury and they're mentioning either a permanent profile or medical evaluation board....
I most likely will take a discharge over the profile, due to too many stories like this.
Its far too common, the army is not what they wish it was, I've lost rank for crossing the rules a little to save someones life. Its all paperwork and demands, like something out of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
AR 800000-65-6333B proclaims we can take your life and dispose of you when done, as long as we give you... The GI bill if you met the requirements....
Its rediculous.