is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
What they have come up with has already been dubbed "the mourning after pill." Propranalol, if taken immediately following a traumatic event, can subdue a victim's stress response and so soften his or her perception of the memory. That does not mean the memory has been erased, but proponents claim that the drug can render it emotionally toothless.
I cannot convince myself that what is really being promoted isn't a form of moral lobotomy.
Will citizens be enlightened about what we are condoning in our ignorance, dispassion or indifference? Or will these two solutions simply bring us closer to realizing the bullet-proof mind, devoid of the inconvenient vulnerability of decent human beings to atrocity and horror? And finally, these are all questions about the morality of proposals that are trying to prevent injuries without changing the social circumstances that bring them about, which sidestep the most fundamental moral dilemma: that of sending people to war in the first place.
A related piece on military suicides from NowPublic contributor phrolen can be found here.
The Yellow Kid
New York, New York, United States
Kuwait
Kuwait city, Kuwait
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 11:56 on January 11th, 2008
I think that the military has an obligation to do whatever it can to keep its soldiers out of harm's way whenever possible, and to make sure their transition to peacetime is as smooth as can be... however, I don't think that turning them into robots is the answer here. Something tells me that emotional repression will lead to some rather serious knock-on effects later on. In the short term, things like body armor and a clear/achievable purpose will be more helpful than some sort of war pharmacy.
at 22:06 on January 12th, 2008
Rob Peters, I like this story. It's good stuff.