NP Rank:
I Fear We Are Losing
Why is it that I often write about such subjects as Darwinism, liberalism, and the ACLU? It is because American society is engaged in a war between those who believe that there is no such thing as right and wrong – and those who hold more traditional views. Those who believe there is no such thing as right and wrong (whom Bill O’Reilly calls Secular-Progressives or SP’s) believe that the only thing that matters is what feels good, and that their behavior is nobody else’s business.
Although many people do not make the connection, this attitude and the behavior it promotes can be traced to Darwinian theory that we are all just accidental products of random happenings – in a straight line down to the dialectical materialism of Marx, Engels and Lenin – down to the communist and Nazi writings and exploits of Stalin, Mao and Hitler – and down to the ACLU and to modern liberalism.
This is not to say that liberals are always bad or wrong or that conservatives are always good and correct, but the obvious disintegration of American society that we see before our eyes (from a traditional standpoint) is going to continue its downward spiral unless those of us who care about such matters (mostly older people) make the connections and fight harder to reverse this trend. The freedom, the security and the prosperity of our grandchildren ultimately depend on having and enforcing standards.
We know enough of our own history that life was often brutal on the American frontier and in the factories and mill towns of an earlier America, and that lawlessness and reckless behavior was the norm. But always, in the towns and cities of this great country the educated class gained ascendancy and put in place laws and standards of conduct based on common Christian and Jewish teachings that had stood the test of time. Many evil things happened, often by those hypocrites who went to church on Sunday and cheated and stole during the rest of the week, but there was a sense of shared values that were widely recognized and accepted. This is no longer true.
Today the educated class of America consists predominately of modern liberals, who are very much in the majority in our universities, our entertainment industry, our media, and possibly in our courtrooms, and they not only teach our young people that it is cool to despise our culture and our history, and that our country is not worth defending, but also that standards based on traditional values are stupid.
Since Darwinism was the most recent beginning of pure materialism, and the ACLU is today’s dominant enforcer of “anything goes in the name of free speech”, it is these twin evils that must be attacked again and again. Let us be clear. There is nothing wrong with teaching evolution in our schools; if anything, modern science has proven Darwin correct with respect to common ancestry and minor evolutionary change, but modern science has also proven that Darwin was wrong to contend that man developed accidentally from a long series of random mutations. That has been shown to be impossible.
There are many good-hearted people who believe that the ACLU is so important in upholding the freedoms that Americans hold dear that they will overlook it and continue their support even when the ACLU takes up a cause that is unfathomable to decent people. This must change. They must begin to stand back and look at American society and what it has become. Is it right to support the right of child molesters to abuse children? Is it right to destroy the Boy Scouts? Is it right to oppose teachers and administrators who try to stop school-children from wearing t-shirts with obscenities on them? Is it right to promote rap-music filled with obscenities and urging violence against police and women? Is it right that our movies and television programs are filled with pornography, extreme violence and the constant message to young women that shacking up with a man they just met in a bar is something all good little girls do today? What are we thinking?
The other thing conservatives must rally to do is to unite and support conservative candidates for political office. Yes, I know we are disgusted by the corruption, ineffectiveness and hypocrisy some of our conservatives have given us for our trouble, but the Leahy’s, the Kennedy’s, the Durbin’s, the Pelosi’s, the Clinton’s, the Kucinich’s and other liberal Democrats are the vanguard of the secular-progressive movement, and they must be defeated with whatever weapons we have at our disposal.
I want to remind Republicans, whose chances for success in 2008 have already been completely discounted by the mainstream press, what the picture was as recently as 2004. Below is a map of the counties in the USA. The red counties were Republican majorities, while the blue counties were Democrat majorities in 2004.
Crowd Power
-
joellerose
Orlando, Florida, United States






Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 04:06 on September 9th, 2007
joellerose, good stuff
- Sign In or Join to post comments
SthPacificat 06:13 on September 9th, 2007
The notions that social darwinism is some how Anti-American in this post is but an oxymoron. American principles of economic competition are based on social darwinism, and to challenge this is to challenge the very core of American values.
The Archaic notion of some kind of Good v's Evil war going on in America, can be traced back to ancient Persia and the Zorastrian religon. Half of all Americans believe in the Deevil or Satan, and this is the root cause of America's problems. The Messianic vision that has been touted by the Neo-Liberal is not new. It is nothing but a reworking of the old Catholic inqusition and is used to justify torture, war, the crushing of civil liberties, Hatred of Jews and Muslims or any other religon than the believers own.
It's high time America kicked out the Devil and crushed it's own loony religons with all the fury of Stalin. So long as home grown religous extremism and Pentecostal Protestant fundamentalists are allowed to flourish the deeper America's problems will become.
Religon in America is nothing more than obscurantism. There has been way too many noticeable examples there, mostly on personal level: weird ideas of American exclusivity, destiny, superiority mixed in with Feng Shui, pagan worship of medicinal stones - all fermented inside superficial Christian Orthodoxy. Superficial, because during the 50 years of the Corpratist rule, study of religion has been mostly substituted with shamanic soul searching and cultural psychosis of hodge-podge obscurant beliefs
- Sign In or Join to post comments
thepeteat 13:42 on September 9th, 2007
We are losing, but not the way you think.
In reply to your paragraph 1: There IS no such thing as pure right and pure wrong--simply pro and anti whatever it is you believe. Ask a bear or an insect about good and evil or right and wrong and I bet it won't know what the hell you're talking about (for more than just the obvious reasons). The point is, it's all about how we define right and wrong. During slave times many people believed it was right to treat blacks like slaves. However, we define "right" differently now. What's to say in another ten or a hundred years we won't define "right" as something other than what we define it as now? Regarding your claim that people who are "SPs" believe that "the only thing that matters is what feels good, and that their behavior is nobody else’s business" I have to say you're letting your reactionary belief of a right and wrong effect your judgment, here.
It's easy to paint the world as black and white. But the world isn't. Bill O'Reilly would define me as an "SP" but I'm not. I believe "hate crime" shouldn't be a legal term but I also believe that what I do in my own home is none of your business. I also don't believe that "all that matters is what feels good." That would be like me saying "all conservatives care about is making their sense of righteousness stronger."
In reply to paragraph 2: Ah, I should have known better than to engage with someone who uses Bill O'Reilly as a non-satirical reference. Next time you can give me proof of God's plan I'll agree that evolution is not real. Sheesh. I'm sure I can trace a willful ignorance straight back through all of Christianity to Jesus and beyond. Now what? You've insulted my intelligence and I've insulted yours. Are we getting anywhere by this pig-headed finger-pointing?
Paragraph 3: Some would argue the disintegration of America has to do with not a lack of standards, but an abundance of blind faith in the system. Some would argue that the "American Empire" is disintegrating from extreme avarice and finally 230 years of greed (political and corporate) are proving too heavy for the system to bear. Outsourcing and over-dependence on oil has caused the US to become over-extended and our economy is showing it. See, that's the problem here. There is all this attention put on religion and anti-religion, race and anti-race, but the real issue here is money. But all you want to talk about is evolution, the ACLU and equating liberals to Nazis.
Paragraph 4: You're generally right--the guidelines for civilization put forth by the Bible, the Torrah and (let's be fair) the Koran are *generally* helpful at maintaining a civilized order in society. HOWEVER, a blind faith in any of the books or the belief systems that have sprung up around them have caused a lot of pain and suffering, too. Of course, the core problem with these books and their belief systems is that they were manufactured to control, not to guide.
You think George W. Bush believes in a heaven? Then explain his behavior, misleading the American people as he has done. He doesn't believe in a hereafter, all he wants is to get rich. He sends America to war and (hundreds of) thousands to their deaths and his pals in the military industrial complex give him stock options and consulting fees for the rest of his life. Do your research into the Carlyle Group and you'll know this is true. If Bush was really worried about doing right, he'd not have marched into Iraq at all. You think God is down with all those deaths based on lies? You think God is hunkydory with Bush? Yet, Bush claims he's tight with God. There's a disconnect here. To me it looks like the powers the be endorse the whole "God" concept because they know it's not true but don't tell us because they want us to stay suckers. Look at the Catholic church. Is God going to send child molesters to hell? If so, then won't God send people who help child molesters get away with it to hell? Yet, look what happens. It's because priests know, deep down, that there is no God, no heaven and it is THEM that believes all that matters is feeling good and that their behavior is nobody else's business.
My belief is that I want to be remembered as a good person, not a bad one. So, I spend my life doing things that I think will help the Earth be a better place. That's why I always try to do good things--I want my immortal soul (my legacy--the memory of me) to live forever in the good graces of humanity (even if it's just my immediate friends and descendants who remember me--I'm not in it for the fame is what I'm saying).
I disagree with your concept of an educated class, too. It's more like the "educated" class.
The things that make the Earth go 'round are politics and money (not in that order, either). Yet, in my public school education I don't remember taking a single class on politics or money. I had to teach myself how to balance a checkbook and I've been following politics for years now and I am always learning new things about how the government works (or not). So, it's not like we shouldn't have classes in these two subjects. Instead we have classes like history (where history stops just after slavery ends) and trigonometry (because we worry about triangle math all the time in modern society, don't we?). Why don't we teach ourselves about WWI and WWII and Korea and Vietnam (and don't forget our war with the Philippines and how we "won" Hawaii)? Why don't we learn about a corporate-sponsored attempted-coup on the United States government (read about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smedley_Butler) and how corporations were first formed and how the stock market works?
These are all things we need to hunt down and throw in a cage before we can learn about them as adults, but wouldn't we have all benefited from learning about them as children? Isn't truth and balance much more important than math and history that ends in the 1800s?
I had meant to address each paragraph in your piece, but I think I've made my point. People like you cry out that the religious majority is being threatened while people you don't like cry "hate crime" and "artistic persecution". Meanwhile people like me are pointing at the real problems which most people are completely ignorant of. The real issues at work here are not religious oppression and artistic freedom, but class and intelligence wars. The longer you think you are being oppressed because you believe in Jesus the longer you'll be distracted from the fact that our economy is imaginary--our money is not backed up by anything but the "good credit" of the United States.
People like you bag on communism. What do you call a society with no real money backed up by gold or silver? Where everyone trades in gift certificates at the country's store?
This is what I mean by getting educated!
at 08:38 on September 10th, 2007
Slavery has existed throughout history, and still exists today in parts of the world. It was Christian, Western and American culture that came to recognize its evil nature and to abolish it voluntarily. We should take pride in that.
at 08:06 on September 21st, 2007
But Joe, the United States does not seem to have any scruples using Filipinos as slaves in order to construct the new super-large American embassy in Iraq. I fail to see any morality in this. If the republican party of the U.S. which still tries to ride the coat-tails of the assassinated-by-a-conservative republican president A. Lincoln's liberation of slaves in the rebellious confederate slave-states of the South, (I know that you know the history behind this, slaves in states loyal to the Union were not set free) how does the conservative faction explain this?
Since I doubt that you would accept the veracity of Think Progress since they oppose this administration, I would think that you would accept the veracity of the quite conservative London Times:
--------------------------------------------------------------
An American civilian contractor has described scenes of panic and hysteria
last year as Filipino construction workers were told that they were on a
plane bound for Baghdad rather than Dubai.
Passengers jumped out of their seats screaming in protest until a gun-toting
air steward ordered them to sit down, claimed Rory Mayberry, an emergency
medical technician travelling on the same flight.
Mayberry said the men were “kidnapped” to build America’s luxurious new
embassy in Baghdad’s green zone. He gave his account to a congressional
committee investigating allegations of fraud at what will be America’s
largest diplomatic mission.
The £300m fortified embassy - a cluster of 21 high-rise towers occupying 104
acres on the west bank of the River Tigris - will house 3,000 staff. It is
regarded as one of the most dangerous building projects in the world.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A bit of a moral paradox for conservatives, no? Oh, by the way, the sexual slavery of Southeast Asian women and children in Saipan, an American territory is another sticky issue. Especially for disgraced Texas republican Tom Delay who effectively worked to protect such abuses by flatly denying that they occur at all despite the massive amounts of empirical evidence to the contrary. And oh, the Christian holy book approves of slavery, remember? Old Testament as well as the purely Christian text scolds slavery's dissenters. This isn't a challenge, I'm just recomending that you encompass the issue in its entirety.