by
michaelvine | February 6, 2008 at 03:43 am
567 views | 10 Recommendations |
3 comments

As I sit here dividing my post-Super Tuesday morning between writing this article, watching Cartoon Network, The Arts Channel, CNN (Yes, T.J. Holmes.), and listening to the unseasonable and incessant wailing of tornado sirens, I find that I am simultaneously encouraged and wearied by my country and its politics.
On the one hand, I am so proud that such a motley assortment of politicians would find a viable place in the running for their parties’ presidential nomination. We have a Mormon, an evangelical Christian, and a septuagenarian former prisoner of war—all purporting to be the
most conservative of Republican nominees. And on the Democratic side, we have a woman and a Black man who seem to share more similar than dissimilar ideas.
That brings me to the other hand. I am no less than disappointed and not just a li’l pissed that any of these attributes, as I have named them, would be food for consideration in electing the next Leader of the Free World. For the life of me, I cannot fathom what the Latter Day Saints, W.W.J.D., military heroics and misfortune, gender, or ill-conceived social categorizations based on not-really-specific phenotypic traits and real or perceived genetic and cultural heritage has to do with determining whether or not a person is worthy to become the President of the United States.
The inconvenient truth is that, while we entertain notions of the United States as a pluralistic society and wear those thoughts as a badge when it makes us feel more enlightened than a few non-Westerners, we have yet to elect a leader who effectively represents our purported pluralistic values. Nor, do we demand great things from our great leaders. Even now, too many of our presidential candidate nominees assert their merit by employing the same ole hackneyed cultural codes and subversive rhetoric as those who preceded them.
The reality is that—in our struggle for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness—we, the people of the United States, have long been our greatest stumbling block, a nemesis more dangerous than any terrorist threat. My prayer is that we will choose to control the prejudices, selfishness and apathy that hinder our path toward much needed reform, and, in this next election, appoint a leader that affirms to our posterity and to all creation that we
are a land of free and foward thinkers, a brave superpower willing and able to mend our flaws before an ever-skrinking world and embrace progressive social revolution from sea to shining sea.
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
at 06:17 on February 6th, 2008
When we elect a president, that person's new constituency is not us, but those who funded their campaign. Race or gender or religion is quite irrelevant in light of that.
at 08:00 on February 6th, 2008
Michael,
Great stuff here, but this really should be in Opinion or at least tagged as such. One big juicy good stuff flag will be coming your soon there after.
at 09:52 on February 6th, 2008
I think a diverse choice in candidates is a positive statement about America. We now are at place where a Black, woman, evangelical, mormon, or moderate Republican can become president. McCains wins also shows that the Big Right Talk media has losts its ability to influence the electorate. That said... this is a great oponion piece.