Pentagon Rejects 'Ray Gun'

by Karen Hatter | August 30, 2007 at 11:29 am
1137 views | 30 Recommendations | 8 comments

Photos

Armored Humvee Patrols in Iraq

Armored Humvee Patrols in Iraq

see larger image

uploaded by Wisco

The Pentagon has rejected using what they call a non lethal weapon, the Active Denial System, that reportedly causes people hit by the ray to feel a sensation like their skin is on fire. The Pentagon is reluctant to use the weapon for fear it might be viewed as a form of torture.
 
The weapon was meant to be mounted on a Humvee or flatbed truck.
 
Previously, in 2005, Neil Davison, coordinator of the non-lethal weapons research project at the University of Bradford in the UK, in an article from New Scientist, stated concern about the ability to control the radiation emitted by the weapon.
 
From the article:
 
The experimenters banned glasses and contact lenses to prevent possible eye damage to the subjects, and in the second and third tests removed any metallic objects such as coins and keys to stop hot spots being created on the skin. They also checked the volunteers' clothes for certain seams, buttons and zips which might also cause hot spots.

The ADS weapon's beam causes pain within 2 to 3 seconds and it becomes intolerable after less than 5 seconds. People's reflex responses to the pain is expected to force them to move out of the beam before their skin can be burnt.

But Neil Davison, coordinator of the non-lethal weapons research project at the University of Bradford in the UK, says controlling the amount of radiation received may not be that simple. "How do you ensure that the dose doesn't cross the threshold for permanent damage?" he asks. "What happens if someone in a crowd is unable, for whatever reason, to move away from the beam? Does the weapon cut out to prevent overexposure?"

recommend Add a comment
phrolen
phrolen
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 12:04 on August 30th, 2007

Karen Hatter, Good stuff, I saw this one on future weapons... thought it was an interesting concept. Glad they put some tought into it before just throwing it out there

0
Karen Hatter

I'm glad they thought better of using this one myself, Phrolen!

angryindian
angryindian
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:46 on August 30th, 2007

This must be a blow to the U.S. weapons industry.  NYC, LA and it was rumoured Atlanta, GA were among the states seeking to use the technology with their municipal police departments.  Jane's Defence Weekly thought it was a reasonable bet for investors.  Is the Carlye Group listening?  Good stuff.

0
Karen Hatter

Well, Angryindian, it seems this has been in the works for 12 years so, let's just hope there isn't a plan to recycle it in some way to recoup possible losses!

denseatoms
denseatoms
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 17:57 on August 30th, 2007

And what about napalm and flamethrowers and nuclear devices that really do burn skin? I guess they are "grandfathered" from consideration.

0
Karen Hatter

We can only hope those were 'grandfathered' in to be excluded from use, Denseatoms! 

jordan
jordan
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 07:55 on August 31st, 2007

I'm glad this is getting tabled... when I read about this new technology, the very first thing that sprang to mind was torture.

0
Karen Hatter

Jordan, with all of the precautions taken before volunteers were exposed to the ray, taking out contact lenses and removing eye glasses to avoid possible eye damage, concern over metals close to the body causing hot spots from the heating of the metal, I don't understand why was it ever considered for use.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from