NP Rank:
Pfizer Charged in Nigerian Children's Deaths
Nigerian officials have brought criminal charges against drug maker Pfizer Inc., the world's largest drug company, alleging the company's involvement in distributing an untested antibiotic, Trovan, during a meningitis outbreak in 1996. They have also filed a civil lawsuit seeking damages and restitution in the amount of 2 billion dollars.
200 children and infants were selected from a camp in the state of Kano, with half of the children given the untested antibiotic. The Nigerian government alleges the rest were given a low dose of a comparative drug made by Hoffman–La Roche.
The lawsuit states researchers did not obtain consent from the parents of the children and they were banned from the ward where the drugs were given. Nigerian officials say Pfizer's actions have resulted in unspecified deaths, with the surviving children, as a result of the drug, left deaf, paralyzed, blind or brain damaged.
Former Kano attorney general, Aliyu Umar has filed the charges with the support of federal and state authorities.
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/29/AR2007052902107.html?referrer=email
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
Lasadh
New York, New York, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (7)
at 20:54 on May 30th, 2007
Mega-corporations at their best! Good stuff!
at 03:22 on May 31st, 2007
Thank you, Nouseforadave!
at 21:20 on May 30th, 2007
Excellent story Karen, unfortunately we may experience the same from Pfizer as they are now in discussion with China to set up more drug manufacturing there, by outsourcing once again, not just our safety and health, but including our lifes. Will melamine used by Chinese companies find its way in drugs as a cheap binder, just as they used in the recent pet foods, and salmon feed for salmon farms, who knows when profit overtakes people lives. With the advent of Pfzier and their new outsourced companies in china, will this be the last we hear of future similar incidents like Nigeria involving Pfizer?
Here is the news link to update your report Karen, for more on outsourcing , you should view my two recent Now Public stories on Air Canada outsourcing our Safety and Proudly outsourcing our Birthright. These two stories are quite an eye opener, especially customers and frequent flyers who may have to rethink flying with Air Canada
http://www.drugresearcher.com/news-by-product/news.asp?id=73673&idCat=17&k=Pfizer--outsourcing-manufacturing
at 04:27 on May 31st, 2007
Thank you for the info, Barry Artiste! As you most likely know, Pfizer isn't the only drug company engaged in these types of practices. We, as citizens and consumers, must be on alert and keep our eyes open!
at 05:41 on May 31st, 2007
Your welcome Karen, I just wonder having worked in Pharmaceutical Research (Cancer) if these Drug Companies outsource to China in order to circumvent (New Drug Applications) NDA submissions and FDA approvals, if these drugs do not end up in North America, but are used as clinical trials in third world countries where as guinea pigs, the drug companies can see if their drugs are effective or not, before applying for FDA approval, as clinical trials are extremely expensive and can take up to 5-7 years before getting on the market. Of course with internet pharmacies popping up and drugs being mailed from China to the North American consumer, can North American consumers be assured if these same drugs do not end up in the North American market if they originate from China? It begs the question, North American Consumers can successfully sue for negligence, where as Third world litigants may not be as successful. In some cases, fast tracking drugs to market are used only in the case of epidemic or when the ailment is IDLH. I can pretty much assure you GLP and GMP practices in China will never even come close to Western Societies. I could go on and on about this subject having worked on NDA and FDA submissions intensively, better for Now Public readers to just internet search for additional answers.
at 06:08 on May 31st, 2007
Barry, it has always been my principle position that since the deregulation of the drug industry in the U.S., shortening the lengthy trial study of new drugs, after the initial testing in the so called Third World and developing nations, the U.S. and other developed nations become yet another tier in the actual testing process.
It is my understanding that most clinical studies done overseas, done almost anywhere actually and as you stated, last less than 10 years. If that is the case, there aren't any long term statistics for any drug when it is introduced onto the market so, the populations of the entire world seem to have become guinea pigs, in most cases unknowingly, on separate rungs of the drug testing ladder!
at 19:58 on May 31st, 2007
The FDA will accept Fast Track submissions from Pharamceutical industries, reducing clinical trials, but these fast track processes are pretty strict and used for drugs to treat or cure deadly Cancers, TB, HIVAids, etc. To get a fast track application approved by the FDA is hell on earth, you better have all your drugs and equipment validated and QA,QC and other processes scrutinised over and over again before called the FDA. When FDA come a knocking on your door, they will go over everything and interrogate you so often, that it will seem like your head will implode.
One thing I have experienced when working with the FDA is their heart is in the right place, their dedication and expertise is above reproach in most cases.